There is a point. To entertain me.You obviously already have your mind made up about this movie before even seeing it. No point in going back and forth with you on it

There is a point. To entertain me.You obviously already have your mind made up about this movie before even seeing it. No point in going back and forth with you on it
There is a point. To entertain me.![]()
It is well documented that nolan refuses to CGI such things as explosions (ie the hospital/rachel dawes's death in TDK) but that scene in TDKR was clearly an exception and not real breh come on that was obviously digitally enhancedi did not say no CG was used... was stating that they DID blow the field! nolan ALWAYS been notorious of actually blowing shyt up rather than using CG...they actually did have explosives scattered all over the field timed to explode. the CG was added later for effect.. but MOST of that scene wasn't CG.
It is well documented that nolan refuses to CGI such things as explosions (ie the hospital/rachel dawes's death in TDK) but that scene in TDKR was clearly an exception and not real breh come on that was obviously digitally enhanced
6 of the bad reviews are from Top Critics on RT. You seriously think a writer for the Associated Press or The NY Observer gives a fukk about trolling for web hits?
The level of delusion on display in this thread is amazing. Not only did Marvel pay off critics, other critics are trolling for website hits. You guys should've wrote for "The X-Files" back in the day.
Fred.
Moments are stretched. Every recollection must be illustrated by a flashback. Character motivations shift on a dime, and if you understand even half of what's going on -- not generally, but specifically -- you'll be doing better than most.