Maybe cause what i wanted to happen didnt happen... I mean yeah it was bloody and gory as hell but it adding the newer elements made it very & kinda campy in a bad way.Well I will be the one putting up the bat signal for 4 then. It was topical, it was bloody as fukk and vicious, had a nice little twist, and got back to what made the first two good. There's no way it's worse than 3 because 3 feels like a PG movie. It feels safe and sedated and just very bland.
Maybe cause what i wanted to happen didnt happen... I mean yeah it was bloody and gory as hell but it adding the newer elements made it very & kinda campy in a bad way.
Then you need to refresh your memory and chime in breh. This will be great cause it ties in with @kp404 thread on the top 10 horror movie thread.Damn bruhs Ive seen each scream but I don't remember anything about em other than Raylan Givens was in one of em
Am I the only one who still trips thatis in a Scream movie
designed to throw us off like they did in part 1, I remember sittin there like "There goes Jada"Jada died in the opening scene in part 2
I HATED them fukkers... from Hayden Panettiere to Emma Roberts & even Keiran Culkin (i think that was him or maybe the other one) got on my nerves. They tried too hard to take it back to the basics that they over did it. Enough is enough.You didn't like the newer kids?
I HATED them fukkers... from Hayden Panettiere to Emma Roberts & even Keiran Culkin (i think that was him or maybe the other one) got on my nerves. They tried too hard to take it back to the basics that they over did it. Enough is enough.