The bias towards hiring offensive coordinators as HC says everything about the NFL

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,338
Reppin
FL
Defense is just as important.

Problem is, many look at defense through the lenses of the past. Coaching defenses to bend but don't break is an intentional part of football now.

defense varies much more year to year than offense does. With the cap, solidifying the offense(QB) gives you a better longterm outlook...just look at the playoff teams.
 

K-Apps

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,761
Reputation
1,339
Daps
25,241
Reppin
Brick City/Happy Valley
It's a shame Jim Schwartz isn't getting another look as a Head Coach, he proved with the Bills he knows how to coach a sound defense and can adapt to his personnel unlike some coaches. He did a solid re-building the Lions after that 0-16 season they had, if he had better assistants and Stafford had improved, he might have been more successful in Detroit.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
69,973
Reputation
11,084
Daps
236,373
defense varies much more year to year than offense does. With the cap, solidifying the offense(QB) gives you a better longterm outlook...just look at the playoff teams.
They're mostly led by former DCs. There's a reason why formers OCs tire of play calling duties.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
20,144
Reputation
3,427
Daps
54,879
Reppin
NULL
With the hard salary cap in place there's a bigger emphasis on offense because of how much a good QB can sway things. Look at the teams who consistently win and are in the playoffs...all have elite level QB's in place.

Great...so like 3 or 4 teams. What about the squads that don't have Brady or Rodgers? The Bengals are consistently in the playoffs and it ain't because of their QB play. Ravens were before them and it wasn't because of their QB. Broncos have basically been winning in spite of their QB all year. Houston, KC, Minny, were all keyed by their defense. 11 of the top 12 teams in PPG against were in the playoffs this year. Teddy Bridgewater, Alex Smith, whoever Houston was starting, Cousins, were all in the playoffs while Brees, Stafford, Ryan, Tannehill, Kaep were all at home.
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,338
Reppin
FL
Great...so like 3 or 4 teams. What about the squads that don't have Brady or Rodgers? The Bengals are consistently in the playoffs and it ain't because of their QB play. Ravens were before them and it wasn't because of their QB. Broncos have basically been winning in spite of their QB all year. Houston, KC, Minny, were all keyed by their defense. 11 of the top 12 teams in PPG against were in the playoffs this year. Teddy Bridgewater, Alex Smith, whoever Houston was starting, Cousins, were all in the playoffs while Brees, Stafford, Ryan, Tannehill, Kaep were all at home.

I would say the Seahawks and Bengals are the gold standards for great drafting. Seattle getting the upper hand because Russell is special. But no other teams in the league have found that type of success via the draft.

Im talking sustainable success...making the playoffs pretty much every season.

Whoever can solve the riddle of not having an elite QB and making the playoffs every season(think what Cleveland I guess is doing) will change the league
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,498
Reputation
9,050
Daps
102,631
Blame Goodell. Rules are skewed towards offensive skill players, particularly the QB.

So who you think is gonna get the HC jobs?

close thread.

Doesn't matter if you have a defensive minded coach,the day of shut down defenses is over. And if you did manage to have one,it would be short lived. At the same time I think the days of a franchise quarterback are over too,give me a game manager:blessed:
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,338
Reppin
FL
They're mostly led by former DCs. There's a reason why formers OCs tire of play calling duties.

True I wouldnt say there's much correlation to hiring an offensive coach to more success overall...I dont think it matters.
 

satam55

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
45,497
Reputation
5,122
Daps
89,662
Reppin
DFW Metroplex
There is simply a huge bias towards hiring offensive coordinators or so called innovators to become NFL head coaches. Every other position coach likely has to toil in the ranks as an DC for years before being given a chance. Mike Zimmer comes to mind as a guy who should have gotten a head coaching job years ago. Just look at how easy Chip Kelly fond another job simply because he's viewed as an innovative offensive coach.

It's wack. Some of the leagues great coaches were former DC's.

This is starting to get sickening.
It's even worse in CFB.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
69,973
Reputation
11,084
Daps
236,373
close thread.

Doesn't matter if you have a defensive minded coach,the day of shut down defenses is over. And if you did manage to have one,it would be short lived. At the same time I think the days of a franchise quarterback are over too,give me a game manager:blessed:
That isn't closing The thread. Like I said...you just proved that folks like you are viewing the game through old lenses. Great defensive minds now coach by quadrants on the field. Meanwhile,you're still looking for the 85 Bears and believe it's not worth finding a DC to lead a team because they fall short of that old way of coaching
 

plushcarpet

Superstar
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
3,536
Reputation
450
Daps
13,029
I get your point but there is still no way that a losing team is gonna outdraw a winning team with all things being equal.
no doubt
i just think the NFL wants offensive minded coaches because big offensive plays is what draws people in nowadays

like that OBJ one-hand catch, the media took that and ran with it for months
 
Top