King Harlem
Superstar
Is if Donald Trump wins the Popular vote and losses the Electoral College. We would immediately move to having Presidential elections determined by Popular vote going forward.
No we wouldn’t
People complain about the electoral college but if it didn’t exist and you live in a certain state your vote would be irrelevant
Not really.Stop with this bullshyt. Your vote counts as one vote using the popular vote. Making them all equal.
Yes really. One person one vote. If more people like you then you win. It's simple just like your brain.Not really.
No disrespect but you are thinking small. Actions like gerrymandering does have an impact. Also, there is a sick and poetic practice in todays politics. Big money funds candidates to help bring about their agenda. Meanwhile, big money rely on votes from everyday people to take it happen. You are kidding yourself if you don't see what's going on but I'm not discouraging people to vote.Yes really. One person one vote. If more people like you then you win. It's simple just like your brain.
No we wouldn’t
People complain about the electoral college but if it didn’t exist and you live in a certain state your vote would be irrelevant
You clearly don't know what the electoral college is or why it's in place. Then had the nerve to call somebody simple-mindedYes really. One person one vote. If more people like you then you win. It's simple just like your brain.
Thats not true. It makes sure the smaller states' votes actually count for something...it also stops potentially tyranny from jumping off
YOU GOT THIS BACKWARDS
A LARGE MASS OF VOTES
ARE IRRELEVANT DUE TO
THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
No everyone's vote is equal if you eliminate the Electoral College because it's not about each state voting anymore. With the Electoral College many voters votes don't mean anything for the presidential election.No we wouldn’t
People complain about the electoral college but if it didn’t exist and you live in a certain state your vote would be irrelevant
Thats not true. It makes sure the smaller states' votes actually count for something...
Breh, ok. The electoral college is there to put everybody at a disadvantage then...
AND IF YOU LIVE
IN AN OVERWHELMINGLY RED OR BLUE STATE
YOUR VOTE DOESNT MEAN shyt.
ELECTIONS ARE LITERALLY
DECIDED BY A HANDFUL OF SWING STATES
EVERY FOUR YEARS
In a true popular vote a state doesn't vote it's just the people. What we really need is rank-based voting .. allow citizens to rank opponents 1-5 or whatever and tally them up that wayThats not true. It makes sure the smaller states' votes actually count for something...it also stops potentially tyranny from jumping off
Breh, ok. The electoral college is there to put everybody at a disadvantage then...
All of this is happening with the Electoral College. What the hell are you talking about? The only difference is everyone's vote would count equally without it.No disrespect but you are thinking small. Actions like gerrymandering does have an impact. Also, there is a sick and poetic practice in todays politics. Big money funds candidates to help bring about their agenda. Meanwhile, big money rely on votes from everyday people to take it happen. You are kidding yourself if you don't see what's going on but I'm not discouraging people to vote.