Beverley missed too many games this year for me to consider the the sample reflective of his true value...but at the end of the day he is a much better option then Prigioni defensively and he shoots the three ball at the same percentage
1. I'm not arguing as to whether or not he's a better defensive option. He clearly is. I'm saying he's not that good of a defender top make a much of a difference.
2. He played the same amount of games as the year before when he was second team all defense which he deserved. So if that amount is enough to say someone is a great defensive player why is it not enough to say someone was/is an average defender?
3. This is defense not shooting percentage. You want to argue that someone is a better shooter than their sample size indicates then I can completely understand. But injury aside judging defense is different.
It seems like we'll agree to disagree on this one. At the end of the day you seem to be higher on a Rocket's ability than i am and i can't be mad at that.
![yeshrug :yeshrug: :yeshrug:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/yeshrug.png)