THE ASTROLOGY OF CORONAVIRUS: ANALYSIS AND FUTURE PREDICTIONS

Did astrology accurately call the progression of the coronavirus?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 41.7%
  • No

    Votes: 21 58.3%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .

HarlemHottie

Uptown Thoroughbred
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
17,754
Reputation
10,761
Daps
74,262
Reppin
#ADOS
Nope we out and about all day. Everyone just got masks on. All facilities got hand washing. Got sanitizers. You end up washing your hands so many times a day. Curfew at 7 pm.
:ld: If y'all also doing the 6 ft thing, that's basically social distancing (minus the curfew which, really, is an attempt at enforcing social distancing).
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
can't get any more irrational than astrology imo.

never understood how people could be comfortable with judging someone based on the MONTH that they were born.

that's just as bad if not worse than judging someone for their ethnicity, gender or age.

but i guess things don't necessarily always have to make sense, live and let live.

The funniest part is that they use the wrong dates. The Earth's path is constantly changing, so people born in those months aren't even born under those signs anymore. But the whole thing is a grift, not science, so astrologers just ignore that all the signs have shifted by several weeks and carry on with the same grift.

Astrology: Why Your Zodiac Sign and Horoscope Are Wrong | Live Science
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
Let's be clear that a ton of the info given is straight false.

The seed of Coronavirus was planted by the most awaited Saturn-Pluto conjunction in Capricorn on January 12 with incredible symbolism. From what scientists have found, the virus came from a bat that was eaten by a snake—both animals ruled by Pluto—with the bat representing death and the snake being an ancient symbol of rebirth and transformation. Timely speaking, it makes sense that this virus was born in November-December before the peak of the aspect (in astrology, aspects are stronger before they perfect).
No, that's nonsense - scientists don't think the virus came from "a bat that was eaten by a snake." The idea that a snake had anything to do with coronavirus at all was a short-lived idea that was debunked months ago.

Also note that they can't say coronavirus started on January 12, so they randomly say, "but months before that date is better". Note how you can shift anything you want to fit the theory - whether it happened in January, or months before, or months after, you can juelz it right in there.



Just to get an idea of how important Saturn-Pluto conjunctions are for humanity, let’s go back in time: World War One and World War Two, as well as the Great Depression and the AIDS epidemic, all happened during a Saturn-Pluto conjunction
That's a straight lie. There were no Saturn-Pluto conjunctions during the Great Depression or World War II, and the AIDS epidemic was decades long so claiming there was a conjuction during the AIDS epidemic is meaningless.

If you look at the Saturn-Pluto conjuctions in recent history, you'll see they occurred in 1914-15, 1947, and 1982. Those dates have no connection to each other at all, and astrologers are constantly trying to make up different things they much signify.



Neptune, also a generational planet, rules Pisces in modern astrology, making its current placement in this sign incredibly strong. By the way, every year, the flu season hits during the time the sun is in Pisces
Again, a total lie. The flu season hits at a different time every year and different places in different countries. Pisces is supposedly late Feb to late March, the flu season is often OVER by the time Pisces hits.



this is how it first started manifesting, exactly during a pretty gnarly Pisces season that included a Mercury (the ruler of the lungs in medical astrology) retrograde in this same sign.
Except that coronavirus didn't start during Pisces, it started way earlier and peaked in many countries way after.

I looked it up and Mercury is supposedly "the chief ruler of the nerve forces and mental faculties of the mankind. Mercury rules over the zodiac sign Gemini and Virgo. The organs of the human body governed by the Mercury are abdomen, tongue, lungs, bowels, nerve centres, bile and muscular tissues." So talking like there's some special connection between Mercury and the lungs is bs - damn near every organ of the body is listed lol.



As this article gets published, warrior Mars sits right next to Pluto as it approaches its last degrees in Capricorn to, later on, form a conjunction with Saturn in Aquarius. Things have been very intense in the last few days with a good amount of Martian law being enforced front and center, and as we already know, they will have to get worse before they get better
There's no such thing as "Martian law". :mjlol:



While Saturn rules restrictions and boundaries, Pluto rules viruses and death, and Jupiter rules abundance as well as magnitude
Let's just think about this for a second. Pluto is an inert rock 5 billion miles away. How da fukk would it "rule" anything? And viruses weren't even discovered until the late 1800s, so someone claiming that astrology declares that Pluto "rules viruses" is probably talking out their ass.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
The funniest part to me is that they try to talk like each planet has a special connection to coronavirus. "This one rules viruses.....this one rules bats....this one rules lungs." But over the course of the article they name damn near every planet! Saturn, Jupiter, Pluto, Mars, Neptune, the sun, and the moon are all mentioned. If you are allowed to connect any planet to coronavirus, and then shift any date in any direction you want, you can make the stars say anything. Every single month there is "something" happening in the planets, so it's easy to claim that that event is just connected to whatever coronavirus event is in that month. And if that doesn't work, you just shift it before or after a little and claim that close counts.

I mean, look at that great confluence that happened on January 12. What big coronavirus moment happened on January 12? ........nothing. But they just shift it to "months earlier is stronger" so they don't even have to get the random date correct.



Edit: what's interesting to me is that these dates align with what the doctors and experts are saying. How could the stars know?
If someone used astrology to predict the progression of coronavirus in 2019, that would have been impressive. But they didn't. They made those predictions AFTER the scientists did, just trying to match what the scientists said by aligning it with random events.

Of course scientists don't make perfect predictions. So we'll see many of those predictions be off. Will the astrologists admit that? No, they'll just shift to match months before or months later or ignore the wrong prediction altogether, as they often do.
 

Mac Brown

Superstar
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
11,278
Reputation
6,543
Daps
38,095
Reppin
H-town
Who’s the girl in the avi

Dap + rep pending

cindy Kimberly



0_Cindy-Kimberly.jpg


5cc0139a0e142.jpeg
 

Save $ not Hoes

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
4,149
Reputation
986
Daps
18,757
I haven't read the thread yet but I'm voting yes. I seen two dudes back in 2019 say shyt was coming. Specifically death.

shyt still blows my mind
 
Last edited:

HarlemHottie

Uptown Thoroughbred
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
17,754
Reputation
10,761
Daps
74,262
Reppin
#ADOS
Let's be clear that a ton of the info given is straight false.


1. No, that's nonsense - scientists don't think the virus came from "a bat that was eaten by a snake." The idea that a snake had anything to do with coronavirus at all was a short-lived idea that was debunked months ago.

2. Also note that they can't say coronavirus started on January 12, so they randomly say, "but months before that date is better". Note how you can shift anything you want to fit the theory - whether it happened in January, or months before, or months after, you can juelz it right in there.

3. That's a straight lie. There were no Saturn-Pluto conjunctions during the Great Depression or World War II, and the AIDS epidemic was decades long so claiming there was a conjuction during the AIDS epidemic is meaningless.

4. If you look at the Saturn-Pluto conjuctions in recent history, you'll see they occurred in 1914-15, 1947, and 1982. Those dates have no connection to each other at all, and astrologers are constantly trying to make up different things they much signify.

5. Again, a total lie. The flu season hits at a different time every year and different places in different countries. Pisces is supposedly late Feb to late March, the flu season is often OVER by the time Pisces hits.

6. Except that coronavirus didn't start during Pisces, it started way earlier and peaked in many countries way after.

I looked it up and Mercury is supposedly "the chief ruler of the nerve forces and mental faculties of the mankind. Mercury rules over the zodiac sign Gemini and Virgo. The organs of the human body governed by the Mercury are abdomen, tongue, lungs, bowels, nerve centres, bile and muscular tissues." So talking like there's some special connection between Mercury and the lungs is bs - damn near every organ of the body is listed lol.


7. There's no such thing as "Martian law". :mjlol:

8. Let's just think about this for a second. Pluto is an inert rock 5 billion miles away. How da fukk would it "rule" anything? And viruses weren't even discovered until the late 1800s, so someone claiming that astrology declares that Pluto "rules viruses" is probably talking out their ass.
:beli: Son, its my birthday. Im not doing all that with you rn. (I'd happily do it later tho, steel sharpens steel). Also, there's a tone of hostility that goes against the experimental spirit of the thread. :ufdup:

Only one of your points are technically correct, but ultimately wrong: the fact that there was no appreciable Saturn Pluto activity around the great depression. You're technically right, the exact conjunction occurred at the peak of the depression in 1931, however...

Pluto is the slowest moving planet in the solar system, so its transits to the planets in your birth chart can take about two years or more to pass completely. It can take over 12 years, however, to transit through each of the houses of your horoscope

Astrology, Pluto Transits, Astrology Lessons Online Chapter 18.1 by Bob Marks
:beli: So... 1929. This is basic astrology. The link i gave you is to a well respected beginner's resource.

Your whole point by point thing is tedious and irrelevant anyway bc I didn't present the article as gospel. I presented it as the starting point for a hypothesis. I literally called it an experiment. :gucci:

Further, as i stated earlier, we are not here to debate astrology. Start your own thread for that shyt. :stopitslime: We're here to see if events line up with the dates proposed, period. :ufdup:

Now if you're genuinely interested, I was gon leave some links to other articles later. It appears as though Saturn- Pluto generally breaks things/ society down. How it does so seems to depend on sign and aspects to other planets. In this case, i suspect Neptune actually being in pisces, it's ruler, might be what made the Saturn- Pluto conjunction come with a side of pandemic.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
:beli: Son, its my birthday. Im not doing all that with you rn. (I'd happily do it later tho, steel sharpens steel). Also, there's a tone of hostility that goes against the experimental spirit of the thread. :ufdup:

Only one of your points are technically correct, but ultimately wrong: the fact that there was no appreciable Saturn Pluto activity around the great depression. You're technically right, the exact conjunction occurred at the peak of the depression in 1931, however...


:beli: So... 1929. This is basic astrology. The link i gave you is to a well respected beginner's resource.

Your whole point by point thing is tedious and irrelevant anyway bc I didn't present the article as gospel. I presented it as the starting point for a hypothesis. I literally called it an experiment. :gucci:

Further, as i stated earlier, we are not here to debate astrology. Start your own thread for that shyt. :stopitslime: We're here to see if events line up with the dates proposed, period. :ufdup:

Now if you're genuinely interested, I was gon leave some links to other articles later. It appears as though Saturn- Pluto generally breaks things/ society down. How it does so seems to depend on sign and aspects to other planets. In this case, i suspect Neptune actually being in pisces, it's ruler, might be what made the Saturn- Pluto conjunction come with a side of pandemic.

Why is it that when I type in "Saturn Pluto conjunction" into google, all I get on all the sites is 1914-1915, 1947, and 1982? None of those dates is the Great Depression, none of those dates is World War II (and WWII was a LONG war, the Asian side was damn near 10 years, it was tough to miss the entire depression AND WWII completely). And the AIDS epidemic has been going on for the last 40+ years and peaked in 1997 (other astrology sites usually don't connect 1982 to the AIDS epidemic, they connect it to the beginning of the internet or new banking protocols or stock market issues or other random shyt). This sounds like another thing where whatever can shift to whatever y'all want it to be.

Saturn conjunction Pluto: 1914, 1915, 1947 and 1982 - Astrology for Aquarius

The timeline of Saturn – Pluto conjunction of years 2019–2020–2021 and its karmic meaning

Difficult Births – Saturn/Pluto | Astrological Updates and Articles by Adrian Duncan



And I won't debate astrology, that sounds like a losing proposition off the bat. But the question was, "Did astrology accurately call the progression of the coronavirus?" and the answer is "No". No astrologers told us about coronavirus until after the scientists did, no astrologers told us its progression until after scientists did. And multiple claims in the quote in the OP were wrong.

That's all, I'm out, just offering it there for anyone who wants to take it. :yeshrug:
 
Top