The Arabic Slave Trade of Africans

HARLEM AL

Your broad loves me.....
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
23,438
Reputation
4,325
Daps
94,248
Reppin
Harlem, NYC
True Christianity was never spread by the sword. Obviously the evil and slave trading white man b*stardnised and defiled what Christianity actually is to line up with their objectives and agendas. cant say the same for islam since its inherently barbaric
Get this all the way the fukk out of here...


And wake up call for you nikkas, Africans sold us.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,282
Reputation
6,285
Daps
100,871
True Christianity was never spread by the sword. Obviously the evil and slave trading white man b*stardnised and defiled what Christianity actually is to line up with their objectives and agendas. cant say the same for islam since its inherently barbaric

giphy.gif


crusades.jpg



1291Crusades.png
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,282
Reputation
6,285
Daps
100,871
So when is there going to be an actual thread about Africans selling Africans? Because I have news for you dudes. There were not any White Muslims and White Christians walking into African villages on the interior taking Africans. Nope. The truth is that Africans were doing that to other Africans.
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,114
Reputation
6,047
Daps
92,521
Reppin
NULL
Are you fugging kidding? Were you not aware of the fact that the Pope approved of and blessed the enslaving of Africans? Where you not aware that the Pope approved stealing from Africans? :gucci:


Pope Nicolas V and the Portuguese Slave Trade

Fifteenth-century Iberian legal traditions regulated Christians’ treatment of Jews, Muslims, and other Christians, clearly delineating, for example, who was enslaveable and who was not. In contrast, the juridical status of people who did not fit these categories was more ambiguous. Legal and philosophical arguments to address this issue began to evolve during the second half of the fifteenth century, once Portuguese mariners began to return to Iberia with captives acquired in West Africa and West Central Africa. Notably, the treatment of “black Gentiles” was addressed in 1452 and 1455, when Pope Nicolas V issued a series of papal bulls that granted Portugal the right to enslave sub-Saharan Africans. Church leaders argued that slavery served as a natural deterrent and Christianizing influence to “barbarous” behavior among pagans. Using this logic, the Pope issued a mandate to the Portuguese king, Alfonso V, and instructed him:

. . . to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever …[and] to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit . . .

Though the papal bull mentions “invading” and “vanquishing” African peoples, no European nation was willing or able to put an army in western Africa until the Portuguese colonization of Angola more than a century later (and even then, Portuguese forces received extensive aid from armies of Imbangala or “Jaga” mercenaries). Early raids such as the one made by Gonçalvez and Tristão in 1441 were unusual, and may have only been possible because the Portuguese had never previously raided south of Cape Bojador. Portuguese mariners soon learned that inhabitants along the Upper Guinea coast were more than capable of defending themselves from such incursions. Not long after his 1441 voyage, Tristão and most of his crew were killed off the coast of present-day Senegal.

Prior to the colonization of Angola, Portuguese colonies and commercial hubs in Africa were generally established on islands that had previously been uninhabited. Meanwhile, feitorias on the mainland depended largely on maintaining good relations with local populations. Thus in addition to justifying the enslavement of Muslims and other non-Christian peoples—including an increasingly important population of sub-Saharan Africans and their descendants—within the Iberian world, this legislation essentially authorized Portuguese colonists and merchants overseas to acquire enslaved Africans through commerce, drawing on pre-existing markets and trade routes.

As the 1455 bull indicates, at first the Church officially limited African slave trading to Alfonso of Portugal. Regardless, other European groups soon followed. During the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, French and English mariners occasionally attempted to raid or trade with Portuguese settlements and autonomous African communities. During the War of the Castilian Succession (1475-1479), the Spanish faction supporting Isabel—future Queen Isabel of Castile—directly challenged Portuguese claims in western Africa, sending large fleets to raid the Cape Verde Islands and conduct trade near Elmina. Despite Castile’s formal recognition of Portuguese interests in western Africa, stipulated in the treaties of Alcáçovas (1479) and Tordesillas (1494), voyages organized in Andalucia and the Canary Islands continued to visit African ports
.

The Papal Bull of 1455 justified the expansion of (black) African slavery within early Iberian colonies, and the acquisition of more African captives and territory, but the same decree also provided a legal framework for sub-Saharan Africans to negotiate with Iberian authorities on equal footing, and to make claims of their own, should they convert to Christianity. Perhaps the best-known example of this form of negotiation is found in the Kingdom of Kongo in West Central Africa. During the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, Kongolese political elites adopted Christianity and sent emissaries to Europe. In the 1520s, Kongo’s Christian ruler used diplomatic pressure based on his religious status to try to limit the Portuguese slave trade from Kongo.

Pope Nicolas V and the Portuguese Slave Trade · African Laborers for a New Empire: Iberia, Slavery, and the Atlantic World · Lowcountry Digital History Initiative

YG3by8VqhMngovyev6Gw_He8XqLn62s0iRbLCxntOkKgGiMyJA1ZJkvq8jJr_tdo9FDIOp5Txvexmh8d46mRgYtI=s0-d
The Pope :mjlol: foh with that bullshyt
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
48,103
Reputation
14,587
Daps
179,762
So when is there going to be an actual thread about Africans selling Africans? Because I have news for you dudes. There were not any White Muslims and White Christians walking into African villages on the interior taking Africans. Nope. The truth is that Africans were doing that to other Africans.

Exactly.

shyt, it’s still going on to this day.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,507
Reputation
13,880
Daps
299,194
Reppin
Toronto
I'm pretty sure you've heard of the Haitian Revolution. Arguably the single largest L the white man has taken from the black man in the last 400 years. France had to sell Louisiana.

There was also one-off battles like Isandlwana in South Africa. British forces wiped off the map with dudes with spears. We can win battles but lost the war.

Technology and organization matters and we don't have superiority in those things. Until we do, we'll keep getting our asses kicked here and in Africa.
they lost many battles but they won't extensively document it.

they were brutalized in jungle warfare by the kenyan Mau Mau to the point where they brought in Idi Amin to fight them from Uganda.

Majority of the stories of how cacs or Arabs did what they did prominently feature c00nS selling us out at pivotal moments.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,507
Reputation
13,880
Daps
299,194
Reppin
Toronto
So when is there going to be an actual thread about Africans selling Africans? Because I have news for you dudes. There were not any White Muslims and White Christians walking into African villages on the interior taking Africans. Nope. The truth is that Africans were doing that to other Africans.
:duck:

Africa is a big place brehski theres not one individual scenario of what happened anywhere

but you go ahead and make that thread. just make it accurate.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,507
Reputation
13,880
Daps
299,194
Reppin
Toronto
Radamillz was no way Black..I got the impression he was Eastern European or something.

Islam :mjlol:
both of em are Somalian... one is/was an Al-shabab fanboy and the other is not so different.

Radamillz just made a post this week trying to shyt on "Christian" Africans calling us weak to colonists :mjpls:

I read between the lines brody...
 

Luken

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,051
Reputation
-334
Daps
39,432
Reppin
Toronto/ Jersey / ATL / LA / Panoramic Roofs
Are you fugging kidding? Were you not aware of the fact that the Pope approved of and blessed the enslaving of Africans? Where you not aware that the Pope approved stealing from Africans? :gucci:


Pope Nicolas V and the Portuguese Slave Trade

Fifteenth-century Iberian legal traditions regulated Christians’ treatment of Jews, Muslims, and other Christians, clearly delineating, for example, who was enslaveable and who was not. In contrast, the juridical status of people who did not fit these categories was more ambiguous. Legal and philosophical arguments to address this issue began to evolve during the second half of the fifteenth century, once Portuguese mariners began to return to Iberia with captives acquired in West Africa and West Central Africa. Notably, the treatment of “black Gentiles” was addressed in 1452 and 1455, when Pope Nicolas V issued a series of papal bulls that granted Portugal the right to enslave sub-Saharan Africans. Church leaders argued that slavery served as a natural deterrent and Christianizing influence to “barbarous” behavior among pagans. Using this logic, the Pope issued a mandate to the Portuguese king, Alfonso V, and instructed him:

. . . to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever …[and] to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit . . .

Though the papal bull mentions “invading” and “vanquishing” African peoples, no European nation was willing or able to put an army in western Africa until the Portuguese colonization of Angola more than a century later (and even then, Portuguese forces received extensive aid from armies of Imbangala or “Jaga” mercenaries). Early raids such as the one made by Gonçalvez and Tristão in 1441 were unusual, and may have only been possible because the Portuguese had never previously raided south of Cape Bojador. Portuguese mariners soon learned that inhabitants along the Upper Guinea coast were more than capable of defending themselves from such incursions. Not long after his 1441 voyage, Tristão and most of his crew were killed off the coast of present-day Senegal.

Prior to the colonization of Angola, Portuguese colonies and commercial hubs in Africa were generally established on islands that had previously been uninhabited. Meanwhile, feitorias on the mainland depended largely on maintaining good relations with local populations. Thus in addition to justifying the enslavement of Muslims and other non-Christian peoples—including an increasingly important population of sub-Saharan Africans and their descendants—within the Iberian world, this legislation essentially authorized Portuguese colonists and merchants overseas to acquire enslaved Africans through commerce, drawing on pre-existing markets and trade routes.

As the 1455 bull indicates, at first the Church officially limited African slave trading to Alfonso of Portugal. Regardless, other European groups soon followed. During the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, French and English mariners occasionally attempted to raid or trade with Portuguese settlements and autonomous African communities. During the War of the Castilian Succession (1475-1479), the Spanish faction supporting Isabel—future Queen Isabel of Castile—directly challenged Portuguese claims in western Africa, sending large fleets to raid the Cape Verde Islands and conduct trade near Elmina. Despite Castile’s formal recognition of Portuguese interests in western Africa, stipulated in the treaties of Alcáçovas (1479) and Tordesillas (1494), voyages organized in Andalucia and the Canary Islands continued to visit African ports
.

The Papal Bull of 1455 justified the expansion of (black) African slavery within early Iberian colonies, and the acquisition of more African captives and territory, but the same decree also provided a legal framework for sub-Saharan Africans to negotiate with Iberian authorities on equal footing, and to make claims of their own, should they convert to Christianity. Perhaps the best-known example of this form of negotiation is found in the Kingdom of Kongo in West Central Africa. During the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, Kongolese political elites adopted Christianity and sent emissaries to Europe. In the 1520s, Kongo’s Christian ruler used diplomatic pressure based on his religious status to try to limit the Portuguese slave trade from Kongo.

Pope Nicolas V and the Portuguese Slave Trade · African Laborers for a New Empire: Iberia, Slavery, and the Atlantic World · Lowcountry Digital History Initiative

YG3by8VqhMngovyev6Gw_He8XqLn62s0iRbLCxntOkKgGiMyJA1ZJkvq8jJr_tdo9FDIOp5Txvexmh8d46mRgYtI=s0-d
Catholicsism is not Christianity. Did you miss the part where I said real Christianity was not spread by the sword?
 

Luken

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,051
Reputation
-334
Daps
39,432
Reppin
Toronto/ Jersey / ATL / LA / Panoramic Roofs
Get this all the way the fukk out of here...


And wake up call for you nikkas, Africans sold us.

You get molested by a corrupt preacher. Do you get mad at the person who's a preacher or do you get mad at the preacher who's a person?

Christianity in Africa predates slavery. Please don't be so simple or naive.
 

Counter Racist Male

Retired poster and occasional lurker
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
10,359
Reputation
1,141
Daps
25,691
Reppin
MYSELF
You get molested by a corrupt preacher. Do you get mad at the person who's a preacher or do you get mad at the preacher who's a person?

Christianity in Africa predates slavery. Please don't be so simple or naive.


In and around Ethiopia yes but I don’t believe that Christianity deep in West or south Africa Presidential dates slavery.
 
Top