Main modern culprits; Thanos, Killmonger, Reva from Obi-Wan, Magneto, Karli (from the Captain America), Wanda from the time of her TV to the Dr. Strange movie
This is mostly about NERD shyt, but, I'm sure you could come up with ppl like Omar (well-written character, but, ppl started biting the style).
These muh'fukkas will do objectively EVIL things and get a pass because "Well, what they doing it for makes sense" or they're painted as a victim of a much bigger threat.
I don't know if it's secret military propaganda, but, this trend is annoying because it lends itself to horrible writing when the main character never really develops because the antagonist "isn't that bad, right?" So, the story goes all over the place.
Killmonger is a good character, but, it was at the expense of T'Challa who already was painted as a lesser hero to the Dora's, less/equally smart to his regular sister, needign the CIA's help, not good enough of a king to deal with Klaw, undermined by his own army, etc., etc.
And when the story needed to conclude with the bad guy losing, they turned Killmonger into a coli poster who wanted to kill all white people no plan, just, we arming black ppl and killing all crackas
I still think they should've write him being slowly intregrated into Wakanda and slowly getting ppl to trust me and the main plot turning into him trying to usurp the throne from T'Challa in sly manner. They bring up how his squad was trained to interegrate into any country...wait, I think that was the Winter Soliders. But, you get my point, play up his intelligence and give him an actual plan
Can a villian be evil, but, maybe elegant and well rounded and human? Hell yea; Kingpin (from the Netflix) show, is a perfect example. Nobody tried to convince you he was a good guy deep down.
Antagonists are just that, they move the story forward by giving
This is mostly about NERD shyt, but, I'm sure you could come up with ppl like Omar (well-written character, but, ppl started biting the style).
These muh'fukkas will do objectively EVIL things and get a pass because "Well, what they doing it for makes sense" or they're painted as a victim of a much bigger threat.
I don't know if it's secret military propaganda, but, this trend is annoying because it lends itself to horrible writing when the main character never really develops because the antagonist "isn't that bad, right?" So, the story goes all over the place.
Killmonger is a good character, but, it was at the expense of T'Challa who already was painted as a lesser hero to the Dora's, less/equally smart to his regular sister, needign the CIA's help, not good enough of a king to deal with Klaw, undermined by his own army, etc., etc.
And when the story needed to conclude with the bad guy losing, they turned Killmonger into a coli poster who wanted to kill all white people no plan, just, we arming black ppl and killing all crackas
I still think they should've write him being slowly intregrated into Wakanda and slowly getting ppl to trust me and the main plot turning into him trying to usurp the throne from T'Challa in sly manner. They bring up how his squad was trained to interegrate into any country...wait, I think that was the Winter Soliders. But, you get my point, play up his intelligence and give him an actual plan
Can a villian be evil, but, maybe elegant and well rounded and human? Hell yea; Kingpin (from the Netflix) show, is a perfect example. Nobody tried to convince you he was a good guy deep down.
Antagonists are just that, they move the story forward by giving