That wasn't a Christian rebuke, though. It was a base insult, not at all in the spirit of love, which is the point of that scriptural quote.
The amount of disdain yall have for women. Please don't procreate.
- Thread starter JLova
- Start date
That wasn't a Christian rebuke, though. It was a base insult, not at all in the spirit of love, which is the point of that scriptural quote.
speaking the truth is a insult now?
"Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ."
1 Corinthians 13:1-13
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; ...
So yes, speaking the truth can be an insult. Even the devil can quote scripture for his purposes- the style, spirit and intention is just as important as whether the statement is true or not. All that faith is useless if you behave in an arrogant, rude, irritable, resentful manner. And let's also not forget that the law under which fatherless children wouldn't go to heaven doesn't survive into the New Testament. It's completely obsolete after Jesus.
Hebrews 12:8 "But if you are without correction, where all are partakers, then are you b*stards, and not sons."
All sinners are b*stards.
Last edited:
nikka are you gay? The thread about disrespecting these hoes and you bringing up Drake?
I made a proper response in this thread.
nikka are you gay? The thread about disrespecting these hoes and you bringing up Drake?
Are you one of the ones embarrassing your self in the NWTS thread?
Zapp Brannigan
Captain of the Nimbus
I can't figure out who I have more disdain for on this board. There are the self-righteous feminists that think that we live in a rape culture, use phrases like "toxic masculinity" to describe men's behavior, and basically act like men are the source of all problems everywhere in society. They also think that women are to never be held responsible for their actions when it comes to things like birth control or how they might otherwise be judged for their actions. I think that this is a really hypocritical, incorrect, and sexist view of gender politics. Then there are the dudes who seem to really assume that all women are bad, obsessing over shyt like virginity, seem to have a burning distrust of women, and seem honestly kind of miserable in relationships. They support these opinions by often hypocritically quoting bible verses and trying to brow beat women into being ashamed of their own sexuality while they themselves try to get as much ass as they can before they get married to someone.
In reality, we don't live in a rape culture, women are generally good, men are generally good, and when you blame one entire gender for society's problems, you look like a little bytch that can't assume more agency over your own life. I also think that there are biological differences that naturally cause women and men to act differently, and that denying these is akin to being a denier of things like evolution and climate change. I actually think that these differences are a good thing, and that they should be celebrated and appreciated. In addition, while I do believe in gender equality, I can't help but cringe every single time I see a false equivalency being leveled between racial politics and gender politics. It's very disingenuous and annoying as fukk because different factors come into play for different reasons, causing a different end result in certain things.
Another thing that annoys me about this board is people that can't seem to fathom how people don't want to live what they see as a fulfilling life. So I don't want to get married? Big fukking deal. I just don't see the point. I'm not in love and I don't want kids. What's more to it? You want some legacy by having a bunch of kids? Do you, son. It makes zero sense to me, as I like having expendable income and being able to date as I please, but that's just me, and I just don't feel the same impulses that you do. You don't have to take someone living a different kind of life as some end-all rejection of women, or "harming the community," or some other self-righteous garbage that people try to spew. In addition, and I'll admit some guilt on this one, it's not fair to assume that people that want families are simpletons that can't figure out a more exciting way to live.
I kinda get both sides of the single mother debate on here. I've known a lot of guys, particularly friends in the military that I grew up with, that ended up getting dumped by some floozy after having a kid or two with her because she thought she could divorce her way to a better man. This is after taking half of his shyt, banging a bunch of guys that she was "just friends" with when they were supposed to be happily married, and otherwise just being a bad person in the relationship. There's also the single mother that used to be "the hot chick" when she was younger, but now that she has children and is less attractive than she used to be, now all of a sudden she wants to talk to some of the guys she happened to not notice before? Do you have any idea how insulting that shyt can be? "Oh, well, when I had my youthful body, no kids, was out having lots of fun, I was way too important to talk to your square ass, but now that I need you to help me raise some other guy's kids, I'm so glad that I know a sweet, responsible, gentleman like you! Can you pick up the tab for me and three friends, now?"
Then there's the other side, where a guy says he will stay and doesn't. The answer to this one is obvious, and we should all understand that this guy shouldn't be let off the hook. It's some pretty fukked up shyt and those guys should be buried beneath the prison. But nobody is arguing that a guy who reneges on his expressly assumed responsibility should be let off the hook. And don't tell me that consenting to sex is the same as consenting to a child, because it's not. Not in the age of birth control and abortions. What people usually argue on here is for women to figure out birth control more responsibly and be more selective about their relationships. And don't give me some "he should wear a condom" argument, because she can refuse him sex if he isn't wearing one, so that's a bad argument. In addition, she can get an abortion, and don't give me the "it's hard to get an abortion!" argument because it's a hell of a lot easier than raising a kid for 18+ years. With that said, I have nothing against helping single mothers by other means, like social programs or whatnot, but I think that the best of all worlds scenario would be if people exercised responsibility way earlier on.
Why do I not think that pushing these standards on women is hateful? Because I give women enough credit to be able to meet these standards, and it would be sexist of me to assume that women should't be given any responsibility over these things. I've honestly done as much of a gut check as I can on these things and cannot conceive how it's hatred of women, unless you're an overly sensitive simp that isn't used to holding women responsible for anything. And stop saying that this board hates women. Do you see the variety of responses in this thread? Of course not, because you only notice people that piss you off and disagree with you, and you get to cluster together with people who have like opinions and feel like martyrs together.
In reality, we don't live in a rape culture, women are generally good, men are generally good, and when you blame one entire gender for society's problems, you look like a little bytch that can't assume more agency over your own life. I also think that there are biological differences that naturally cause women and men to act differently, and that denying these is akin to being a denier of things like evolution and climate change. I actually think that these differences are a good thing, and that they should be celebrated and appreciated. In addition, while I do believe in gender equality, I can't help but cringe every single time I see a false equivalency being leveled between racial politics and gender politics. It's very disingenuous and annoying as fukk because different factors come into play for different reasons, causing a different end result in certain things.
Another thing that annoys me about this board is people that can't seem to fathom how people don't want to live what they see as a fulfilling life. So I don't want to get married? Big fukking deal. I just don't see the point. I'm not in love and I don't want kids. What's more to it? You want some legacy by having a bunch of kids? Do you, son. It makes zero sense to me, as I like having expendable income and being able to date as I please, but that's just me, and I just don't feel the same impulses that you do. You don't have to take someone living a different kind of life as some end-all rejection of women, or "harming the community," or some other self-righteous garbage that people try to spew. In addition, and I'll admit some guilt on this one, it's not fair to assume that people that want families are simpletons that can't figure out a more exciting way to live.
I kinda get both sides of the single mother debate on here. I've known a lot of guys, particularly friends in the military that I grew up with, that ended up getting dumped by some floozy after having a kid or two with her because she thought she could divorce her way to a better man. This is after taking half of his shyt, banging a bunch of guys that she was "just friends" with when they were supposed to be happily married, and otherwise just being a bad person in the relationship. There's also the single mother that used to be "the hot chick" when she was younger, but now that she has children and is less attractive than she used to be, now all of a sudden she wants to talk to some of the guys she happened to not notice before? Do you have any idea how insulting that shyt can be? "Oh, well, when I had my youthful body, no kids, was out having lots of fun, I was way too important to talk to your square ass, but now that I need you to help me raise some other guy's kids, I'm so glad that I know a sweet, responsible, gentleman like you! Can you pick up the tab for me and three friends, now?"
Then there's the other side, where a guy says he will stay and doesn't. The answer to this one is obvious, and we should all understand that this guy shouldn't be let off the hook. It's some pretty fukked up shyt and those guys should be buried beneath the prison. But nobody is arguing that a guy who reneges on his expressly assumed responsibility should be let off the hook. And don't tell me that consenting to sex is the same as consenting to a child, because it's not. Not in the age of birth control and abortions. What people usually argue on here is for women to figure out birth control more responsibly and be more selective about their relationships. And don't give me some "he should wear a condom" argument, because she can refuse him sex if he isn't wearing one, so that's a bad argument. In addition, she can get an abortion, and don't give me the "it's hard to get an abortion!" argument because it's a hell of a lot easier than raising a kid for 18+ years. With that said, I have nothing against helping single mothers by other means, like social programs or whatnot, but I think that the best of all worlds scenario would be if people exercised responsibility way earlier on.
Why do I not think that pushing these standards on women is hateful? Because I give women enough credit to be able to meet these standards, and it would be sexist of me to assume that women should't be given any responsibility over these things. I've honestly done as much of a gut check as I can on these things and cannot conceive how it's hatred of women, unless you're an overly sensitive simp that isn't used to holding women responsible for anything. And stop saying that this board hates women. Do you see the variety of responses in this thread? Of course not, because you only notice people that piss you off and disagree with you, and you get to cluster together with people who have like opinions and feel like martyrs together.
Zapp Brannigan
Captain of the Nimbus
Pick a side 
You are using facts to make indictments on dude's character and claim him to be inferior:heh;
Where did I judge? I posted facts!!
dude is acting like fatherless children are ok, you shouldn't even be talking you sold out your race and ghanian blood already
It would be like if someone said "o youre Jamaican? you must be a criminal and illegal immigrant, youre inferior"
Its a fact that Jamaica has crime and immigration problems, but that doesn't mean YOU are a criminal or illegal immigrant
Likewise someone being a product of a single parent household doesn't mean you get to shyt on them
You are supposed to be this righteous example of manhood... but you are petty, vindictive, judgmental and weak... you volunteer to help single parent kids and then come online and talk shyt about them, what the fukk is wrong with you nikka
I actually like the album but the saving you're doing is so over the top.
Here's the thing... I don't think @His_Excellence_Reincar hates women. I do think he has very little respect for women, and even less respect for single mothers. I'm not 100% sure where his disrespect toward single mothers comes from, especially considering that if the "infamous" woman he was with had not had the abortion, she would have been a single mother. And he probably would have married her. Maybe he forsees what would have happened considering she cheated on him, and in turn he would have left her and she would have become the type woman that he has so little respect for, thus he is projecting his opinion of her onto the type of woman that she would have been. Then consider his tendency to generalize, and it's a free for all again single mothers.
But even more perplexing to me is that his child would have been the same as the b*stards (in it's actual meaning) he refers to on this website. So in a sense, he also has some sort of resentment toward his aborted child.
Even MORE confusing is that he has so little respect for single mothers that he doesn't see them as valuable enough to be in a relationship with any respectable man, YET he has an almost volatile dislike of single parent households. It ironic because single mothers finding respectable men who are also willing to take on the responsibility of helping to raise their child/children would help decrease the presence of single parent households, but he doesn't see this as an acceptable option because of his lack of respect for single mothers in the first place.
Furthermore, all of this volunteering doesn't mean much to me. Volunteering out of genuine concern and empathy is very different from helping because of a feeling of pity and a sense of superiority, and the latter is what it appears to be the case based off of your comments.
Now I may be wrong about everything that I've said, but it's just what I've noticed.
Oh yea... as someone who portrays himself as a stout Christian, it was very ignorant of you to quote a verse from the old testament to pass judgement on children born out of wedlock. It also contradicts most of what you claim about your own relationship with God.
But even more perplexing to me is that his child would have been the same as the b*stards (in it's actual meaning) he refers to on this website. So in a sense, he also has some sort of resentment toward his aborted child.
Even MORE confusing is that he has so little respect for single mothers that he doesn't see them as valuable enough to be in a relationship with any respectable man, YET he has an almost volatile dislike of single parent households. It ironic because single mothers finding respectable men who are also willing to take on the responsibility of helping to raise their child/children would help decrease the presence of single parent households, but he doesn't see this as an acceptable option because of his lack of respect for single mothers in the first place.
Furthermore, all of this volunteering doesn't mean much to me. Volunteering out of genuine concern and empathy is very different from helping because of a feeling of pity and a sense of superiority, and the latter is what it appears to be the case based off of your comments.
Now I may be wrong about everything that I've said, but it's just what I've noticed.
Oh yea... as someone who portrays himself as a stout Christian, it was very ignorant of you to quote a verse from the old testament to pass judgement on children born out of wedlock. It also contradicts most of what you claim about your own relationship with God.
A whole essay about me I'm flattered 
Actually I respect women who are worthy of respect, and you are correct I do not respect single moms.
And you are incorrect I was six months away from marriage before I called it off. And she never cheated on me.
Actually I have said single moms should not bein rrelationships because the highest molestation rare is between children of single mlms and the step daddy boyfriend the mom brings around. In Essence if a single mother loves her child she will cease being in a relationship till he / she is of age .
And I have no resentment I've been apart of two other abortions after the fact
And yes your wrong but thanks for all that jargon you wrote.
So I white a bible verse talking about b*stard children and suddenly its wrong?
Ishmael never received the covenant
And how doe it contradict?
A child born out of wedlock is a child born out of sin , unworthy of blessings.
Actually I respect women who are worthy of respect, and you are correct I do not respect single moms.
And you are incorrect I was six months away from marriage before I called it off. And she never cheated on me.
Actually I have said single moms should not bein rrelationships because the highest molestation rare is between children of single mlms and the step daddy boyfriend the mom brings around. In Essence if a single mother loves her child she will cease being in a relationship till he / she is of age .
And I have no resentment I've been apart of two other abortions after the fact
And yes your wrong but thanks for all that jargon you wrote.
So I white a bible verse talking about b*stard children and suddenly its wrong?
Ishmael never received the covenant
And how doe it contradict?
A child born out of wedlock is a child born out of sin , unworthy of blessings.
This board is full of buthurt people who blame the other sex for their own shortcomings.
you'll never be happy if you surround yourself with negativity.
you'll never be happy if you surround yourself with negativity.
I agree with this.
Last edited:
