The AMC Stock Discussion Thread

[JackRoss]

 

[NinoBrown]

Price is fine, this is to be expected....

 

[Mannish]

Anybody else buy their shares through Stash? I haven't received a vote email yet, and was already kinda suspicious...

 

[Sinnerman]

Just got the email from fidelity. How are you brehs voting?

 

[JackRoss]

Price is fine, this is to be expected....

I'm waiting them out broski. Win or lose this has been a fun ride.

 

[JackRoss]

Just got the email from fidelity. How are you brehs voting?

I don't know what to vote. I need somebody to explain it to me lol.

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Just got the email from fidelity. How are you brehs voting?

Got mines too

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

I don't know what to vote. I need somebody to explain it to me lol.

Somebody will have to explain. From what I understand, with an extra 25 million shares, that means retail won't own as high a percentage, we own something like 80%. An additional 25 million shares would possibly bring up down to 70% or something.

I'm more on terms with voting no. I'm patient, ain't in a rush.

 

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

The vote doesn't have to be done until July 28th, so you've got time to research.

You can even vote now and change your vote (should receive a confirmation email with a link if you want to change your selections).

Voted "no" for extra shares. If it moons well before July 28th and we get paid....fine.....but not before then.

 

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

Somebody will have to explain. From what I understand, with an extra 25 million shares, that means retail won't own as high a percentage, we own something like 80%. An additional 25 million shares would possibly bring up down to 70% or something.

I'm more on terms with voting no. I'm patient, ain't in a rush.

It can drop the price...but retail could buy those up too and the price would snap back.

AMC is trying to raise money to help with debt.

Agree with you....we need to see the squeeze and margin call action first.

 

[JackRoss]

Somebody will have to explain. From what I understand, with an extra 25 million shares, that means retail won't own as high a percentage, we own something like 80%. An additional 25 million shares would possibly bring up down to 70% or something.

I'm more on terms with voting no. I'm patient, ain't in a rush.

Oh. If that's the case, fukk them nikkas

 

[pawdalaw]

Then why hasn’t/wasn’t GME been margin called or the SEC done anything after GME was trading at $500 a share, and there was so much scrutiny after some brokerage firms halted trading on it that literally special congressional sub committees and hearings have been held? They also shorted Tesla for well over a year. Again, I get being optimistic. I’m one of the most optimistic brehs on here. I hope this shyt moons today. However, there’s a difference between being optimistic and being obstinately idyllic about what “potentially” could happen. Some of you are already damn near 7 months deep in this. This potentially could go on for more than a year. There’s precedence of it happening. Given that context, we need to vote no. No more new shares until we get what it is ours and justice is meted out.

Well this week and next they implemented the last 2 rules which we feel are nails in the coffin.

#005: They cant use the same shares repeatedly to short. Which is why a count of what exists in the dark pool was released yesterday. Some 300m synthetics. Not billions like we thought. But hey! It doesnt hurt the dynamics of the squeeze.

002# on Monday: mandatory reporting and liquidity tests. And if they are not liquid enough, Mandatory margin calls. We're in 100x better position than January.

They wasn't bleeding money then either. They could have cut losses and lived another day. Bu instead they went kamikaze.

 

[Aprogressivone]

I don't know what to vote. I need somebody to explain it to me lol.

Vote no!!!!!! No offense to anyone voting yes but that is just dumb. We retail investors own 80% of all the stock. We don't know how long this will play out. Allowing hedge funds to potentially buy up new shares created by voting yes might allow them to better cover their naked shorts synthetic(fake stock) mess they created. Remember we are in uncharted waters. As much as we think the mother of all shorts squeezes(MOASS) will trigger soon, we really don't know. Keep hitting the hedges hard by not allowing new shares to be created. There is zero benefit for us to create new shares.

 

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

Looks at how many "forget about AMC and GME, check out this stock" articles there are:

 

[Sinnerman]

Well this week and next they implemented the last 2 rules which we feel are nails in the coffin.

#005: They cant use the same shares repeatedly to short. Which is why a count of what exists in the dark pool was released yesterday. Some 300m synthetics. Not billions like we thought. But hey! It doesnt hurt the dynamics of the squeeze.

002# on Monday: mandatory reporting and liquidity tests. And if they are not liquid enough, Mandatory margin calls. Were in 100x better position than January.

They went bleeding money then either. They could have cut losses and lived another day. Bu instead they went kamikaze.

300 million synthetics for AMC right? Thanks, I was looking for that number earlier