The AMC Stock Discussion Thread

[Jean toomer]

not here to talk AMC, but my entire portfolio has been taking an ass kicking to the tune of over 10% in the last month alone

Everybody has unless your sole play is bonds and precious metals. Whole damn thread is a cautionary tale….

 

[pawdalaw]

Gladly. Your point doesn’t make sense, but a 2 month time horizon as an argument is about what I’d expect from someone who has AMC as one of their top holdings, so I’ll still answer this.


Since Jan 1, Apple is down approx. 11% Microsoft is down 14% (back of napkin math).

Obviously not ideal, but with Fed rate hikes and a possible WW3, market as a whole is down. S&P500 is down around 12.5% in 2022.

So AAPL and MSFT notably down over the last 2 months, S&P5 as well. So, should we check on AMC? To see how they’ve done in that same timespan? I see a price of $27.20 on NewYears Eve. It’s down to $16.03 as I type this. Soooo back of napkin math, $AMC is down around 40% since 2022 started


Not sure what you wanted to prove there, but this was a fun exercise.

Apple, Amzn, Tesla were the stocks I mentioned. You typed 2 paragraphs while only mentioning 1of them....
Amzn $3300>2900
Appl $182>157
Tsla $1150>760
So that's roughly 20-30% in roughly half the time. Each of these company's are significantly larger than AMC. Within that same time frame AMC has roughly 1000× the failures to deliver of all 3 companies combined. So when you say it's down 60% since Nov. What was it that caused that decline? Why is such a small meaningless company being shorted to shyt? And who has taken ownership of all of these shares sold short? If 90% of the float was owned by retail 03/21 then why has Institutional holdings increased almost 3 fold? How are hedgies still able to short AMC daily in spite of the float being totally owned since last spring.

Quite a few of yall are smart enough to figure this shyt out. Not a single one of yall have addressed the elephant in the room.the mechanics of the market imply that hedgefunds will be held responsible for purchasing back these shares in the event of a margin call. The entire alphabet gang is conducting Rico investigations as I type this

Practically everything that is going on today with the global economy was forecast at this time last year in this thread.

I don't continue to come in this thread because it's fun, it's not! I continue to stand on this hill because not a single one of you have presented a shred of evidence contrary to the reason for doing so. it takes a real sucka to see this situation for what it is and not let it ride. I'll be the 1st to come in here and say yall we're right. But until then, I'll continue to hold. Thanks for the civility. My apologies for the snide remarks.

 

[beenz]

Everybody has unless your sole play is bonds and precious metals. Whole damn thread is a cautionary tale….

I dont have AMC. I am invested in like 50 different companies. I'm not gonna go bankrupt though.

 

[pawdalaw]

You can start by addressing that link you posted yesterday that reiterated my point..

Just say you don't want to see folks get money. First thing you do is dissappear after what you posted is refuted.

 

[Big Jo]

I'll be the 1st to come in here and say yall we're right. But until then, I'll continue to hold.

when though? at what point will you realistically say AMC expectations are not aligned with reality?

In 3 months? 6 months? 1 year? 5 years? 10 years?

how many supposed catalysts & time frame targets have to miss?

you said a run up was coming in February, to your credit it ran up and touched $20 then it immediately slid back down. I’m not a chartist but from a charting perspective just watching it every day you can tell it’s regressing, the highs are lower and shorter lived and lows keep getting lower and sitting longer

The next supposed catalyst is 1st week of March, I have those posts bookmarked, and am expecting the same sideways movement at best or sub $15 pps … we’ll see. What then?

The danger in continuously moving the goal posts and time frames in light of downward price action is one day you’ll wake up holding the bag, your entire investment might be bled dry or down 80-90%, volume will be dead, the pumpers will have moved on and you’ll have a sobering moment realizing you were scammed on bad info and likely malicious intention. I’ve been there and hate to see it happen to anybody

that’s why so many of us are crying foul and deciding to move on at a loss, because right now holding the stock Isn’t doing anybody any favors, there’s no real indication shorts have to cover in a way that will trigger MOASS, and a years worth of Reddit posts and tweets on MOASS catalysts and expectations have been WRONG

when i look at a list of the most heavily shorted stocks, AMC doesn't even show up any more. why not? why are AMC shorts specifically going to trigger MOASS at this point and no other heavily shorted stock would?

it would be one thing if PPS was sticking and holding around say $30-$40, instead it’s gotten completely obliterated… and don’t just blame the market when this was suppose to trend against the market. especially since we’ve seen AMC free fall on average worse than the market itself or FAANG

you said this is your first major foray in the stock market, well it’s not mine, I was trading penny stocks heavily 10 years ago and this scenario was common. Replace Reddit with investorhub, it was the same thing, you’d have pumpers drawing up all sorts of pretty charts and analysis, volume metrics, institutional buys, price targets etc and at best, they were right much less than half the time. I think if you’ve seen what I’ve seen in this game you’d be humming a different tune or at the very least, not blindly and naively trusting twitter noise and continuing to defend AMC every time somebody questions it. I know you mean well, but I think you’re likely in for a rude awakening.

charts and analysis can get manipulated, people lie, price per share doesn’t.

 

[Charly Wingate]

Lol this shyt was a fukking fail

Did you start a position at $72?

 

[Silky Johnson]

You can start by addressing that link you posted yesterday that reiterated my point..

Just say you don't want to see folks get money. First thing you do is dissappear after what you posted is refuted.

What point? You cherry picked a pension fund that has 3000 other positions. My post gave some context to what institutions are actually doing in terms of this stock. In the grand scheme, the money they put into AMC last quarter was insignificant compared to the other stocks the same fund brought in the same quarter.

You cannot make a bull case based on fundamentals, technicals or institutional ownership. You can't make a case based on qualitive analysis. Why are you even in this thread if you can't add anything to the discussion of the stock? What do you know about this company other than Twitter and wsb hoe babble?

 

[DJ Paul's Arm]

You retail shorts still up in here arguing?

 

[pawdalaw]

@Silky Johnson
There is no way in hell you can spin a 20 million increase via shares bought vs a 5 million decrease in shares sold. So if I pick 1 fund and the broader sample size indicates the same then wtf is your point? Hoe babble, you barking at the fukking moon.

I am in this thread because I was invested in AMC before it was even made: And I didn't invest based on fundamentals, I wanted the squeeze from shorts being covered.. But since that's what you like to throw out there

Fundamentals: nothing but improvements, more liquid cash, reduction of debt, lowered interest rates, longer window for repayment, acquisitions of high value theaters, sold out sporting events and concerts. Triple the institutional ownership and a drastic increase in synthetic shares sold short. If any of this is false, let us know.

Now tell us why you are in here! You alleged to have bought and sold 1 call in the past year. What skin do you have in the game? You say you sold your call last January...

@Big Jo, to move goalposts or dates would imply that I somehow have control of the market. Rules and mechanics of the market explicitly state that certain conditions produce certain results. Those conditions are closer than ever before. Every indication affirms that. I was told shyt should have happened last March. Instead of relying on word of mouth and he say/she say I've taken the time to read up and familiarize myself, that way I'm not moved by what someone posts here on wsb or Twitter. I'm holding until shorts are covered. Don't follow me, learn what the play is and make your decisions based on that. You bookmarking my posts to try and prove me wrong instead of studying the play to come out on the right side of it.

 

[pawdalaw]

You retail shorts still up in here arguing?

Nikka with no money in the game asked me why I'm in here. I can't make this up...

 

[Charly Wingate]

You retail shorts still up in here arguing?

I never understood why mfs care about how @Another Man spends his money, if they want to lose their bread so be it. Unless we got paid bashers on thecoli

 

[Creepn]

I never understood why mfs care about how @Another Man spends his money, if they want to lose their bread so be it. Unless we got paid bashers on thecoli

I know. We let these fools know that we put in weed money, drinking money, play money, whatever money into this multiple times already. I guess they rather us get high and fukked up than take a chance to make some life changing money.

 

[Silky Johnson]

How you talk about fundamentals without posting a single number @pawdalaw

You are on the Nasdaq site so it shouldn't be too hard to go thru the 10qs to back up the bullshyt you selling

 

[pawdalaw]

How you talk about fundamentals without posting a single number @pawdalaw

You are on the Nasdaq site so it shouldn't be too hard to go thru the 10qs to back up the bullshyt you selling

What part of what I posted isn't factual? You name the source for the info but ask me to provide it.
"AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Class A Common Stock (AMC) Earnings Report Date | Nasdaq" https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/amc/earnings

Short squeeze was never about fundamentals. Only way hedgies win is if there is bankruptcy. So you switch the narrative.
Last year at this time there was a vote for dilution. Refute just one of the improvements I listed, Just 1!

 

[Big Jo]

Short squeeze was never about fundamentals. Only way hedgies win is if there is bankruptcy.

you didn’t still answer my question from before

when you look at a list of the most heavily shorted stocks - AMC is no longer there

given that at any given time there are dozens of heavily shorted stocks, why would AMC be more primed to squeeze than any of the rest?

Any conversely, why not bet on a squeeze for any of the other stocks that are currently more heavily shorted than AMC?