Tennessee Republicans vote to allow clerks to refuse marriage licenses to LGBTQ+ couples and interracial couples

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,898
Reputation
4,518
Daps
80,692
Reppin
The Arsenal
It’s wild (although not surprising) to see Coli brehs running with it too.

It’s the article making that leap…which is why we should always question the source sharing “news”
are you three saying you don't know being against interracial marriage is actually a true christian principle and if someone wanted to deny someone service or a license because of it then it's a religious freedom issue in their eyes?


 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,006
Reputation
14,319
Daps
199,929
Reppin
Above the fray.
are you three saying you don't know being against interracial marriage is actually a true christian principle and if someone wanted to deny someone service or a license because of it then it's a religious freedom issue in their eyes?


With all due respect, you're mentioning things that most students of History are aware of. Segregation of races was preached from the pulpit and "supported by Old Testament passages".

Not exactly a reveal. The current topic is squarely about local control of granting marriage licenses to same sex couples.

We know how things work, and can be applied in the future but can we actually stay on topic for once about this?
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,708
Reputation
4,651
Daps
102,995
are you three saying you don't know being against interracial marriage is actually a true christian principle and if someone wanted to deny someone service or a license because of it then it's a religious freedom issue in their eyes?


Christians are against a lot more than interracial marriage.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,898
Reputation
4,518
Daps
80,692
Reppin
The Arsenal
With all due respect, you're mentioning things that most students of History are aware of. Segregation of races was preached from the pulpit and "supported by Old Testament passages".

Not exactly a reveal. The current topic is squarely about local control of granting marriage licenses to same sex couples.

We know how things work, and can be applied in the future but can we actually stay on topic for once about this?
well "with all due respect" House Bill 878 states that county clerks and their staff “shall not be required to solemnize a marriage if the person has an objection to solemnizing the marriage based on the person’s conscience or religious beliefs.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
19,871
Reputation
6,241
Daps
99,662
This gotta be the dumbest shyt I've ever read on here in my life.

It's also hilarious how many of you have no actual beliefs of any kind
Slavery statutes were enacted by Northern and Southern States. In fact Massachusetts was the first State to enact a Slavery statute in 1621. They already came for Black people friendo.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Messages
15,508
Reputation
2,126
Daps
58,227
Slavery statutes were enacted by Northern and Southern States. In fact Massachusetts was the first State to enact a Slavery statute in 1621. They already came for Black people friendo.
I'm not engaging someone as retarded as yourself. I've learned my lesson, trying to talk to white supremacist supporting idiots enough. That original statement is still one of the dumbest things ever written in the history of this board.
 

Wildhundreds

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,701
Reputation
3,892
Daps
99,380
With all due respect, you're mentioning things that most students of History are aware of. Segregation of races was preached from the pulpit and "supported by Old Testament passages".

Not exactly a reveal. The current topic is squarely about local control of granting marriage licenses to same sex couples.

We know how things work, and can be applied in the future but can we actually stay on topic for once about this?

Post some of these passages and I'll post a contradictory passage because ALL PREACHERS twist the bible to fit a narrative.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
19,871
Reputation
6,241
Daps
99,662
I'm not engaging someone as retarded as yourself. I've learned my lesson, trying to talk to white supremacist supporting idiots enough. That original statement is still one of the dumbest things ever written in the history of this board.
The original statement was that they had already came for Black people. What the fugg does your dumbass think that slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and all of that shyt was about you dumb b*stard?
 

DonB90

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,333
Reputation
1,255
Daps
50,146
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Martin Niemöller is best known for writing First They Came, but he is a complicated figure. Initially an antisemitic Nazi supporter, his views changed when he was imprisoned in a concentration camp for speaking out against Nazi control of churches.
Bruh they been coming for blacks since 1619 in this country. No one has been there for us. No one. I didn't see no rainbow flags in Selma when they unleashed dogs on us. George Floyd and Tyre Nichols weren't murdered in the middle of the street because they were gay. No black man has ever walked into a gay establishment and committed mass murder. This doesn't concern me or any other black man that has to get his mind prepared just to step out the door in America. You doing all this campaigning for a fractional group of sex deviant people who have more rights then even you do, assuming you are black.
 
Top