Tennessee Republicans vote to allow clerks to refuse marriage licenses to LGBTQ+ couples and interracial couples

[hashmander]

It’s wild (although not surprising) to see Coli brehs running with it too.

It’s the article making that leap…which is why we should always question the source sharing “news”

are you three saying you don't know being against interracial marriage is actually a true christian principle and if someone wanted to deny someone service or a license because of it then it's a religious freedom issue in their eyes?

Christian Opposition to Interracial Marriage Is Still a Problem

As people of faith, our blood should boil when we hear people try to say our God is for marriage segregation.

sojo.net

‘Because of Our Christian Race...’ Mississippi Venue Won’t Do Gay or Mixed Race Weddings

A video allegedly showing an employee of an event venue saying they won’t host “gay weddings” or “mixed race” nuptials because of her religion has gone viral, sparking an uproar on social media.

www.theroot.com

 

[Wildhundreds]

LOL.. OP says LGBTQ is targeted and blacks are next.. As if black LGBTQ people aren't already targeted. Its easy to tell who watch T.V and youtube all day.. How can you separate the two?

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

They already came for Black people. Nobody spoke out.

This gotta be the dumbest shyt I've ever read on here in my life.

It's also hilarious how many of you have no actual beliefs of any kind

 

[get these nets]

are you three saying you don't know being against interracial marriage is actually a true christian principle and if someone wanted to deny someone service or a license because of it then it's a religious freedom issue in their eyes?

Christian Opposition to Interracial Marriage Is Still a Problem

As people of faith, our blood should boil when we hear people try to say our God is for marriage segregation.

sojo.net

‘Because of Our Christian Race...’ Mississippi Venue Won’t Do Gay or Mixed Race Weddings

A video allegedly showing an employee of an event venue saying they won’t host “gay weddings” or “mixed race” nuptials because of her religion has gone viral, sparking an uproar on social media.

www.theroot.com

With all due respect, you're mentioning things that most students of History are aware of. Segregation of races was preached from the pulpit and "supported by Old Testament passages".

Not exactly a reveal. The current topic is squarely about local control of granting marriage licenses to same sex couples.

We know how things work, and can be applied in the future but can we actually stay on topic for once about this?

 

[duncanthetall]

At least you are honest if nothing else I can respect that.

An honest idiot is still an idiot

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

are you three saying you don't know being against interracial marriage is actually a true christian principle and if someone wanted to deny someone service or a license because of it then it's a religious freedom issue in their eyes?

Christian Opposition to Interracial Marriage Is Still a Problem

As people of faith, our blood should boil when we hear people try to say our God is for marriage segregation.

sojo.net

‘Because of Our Christian Race...’ Mississippi Venue Won’t Do Gay or Mixed Race Weddings

A video allegedly showing an employee of an event venue saying they won’t host “gay weddings” or “mixed race” nuptials because of her religion has gone viral, sparking an uproar on social media.

www.theroot.com

Christians are against a lot more than interracial marriage.

 

[hashmander]

With all due respect, you're mentioning things that most students of History are aware of. Segregation of races was preached from the pulpit and "supported by Old Testament passages".

Not exactly a reveal. The current topic is squarely about local control of granting marriage licenses to same sex couples.

We know how things work, and can be applied in the future but can we actually stay on topic for once about this?

well "with all due respect" House Bill 878 states that county clerks and their staff “shall not be required to solemnize a marriage if the person has an objection to solemnizing the marriage based on the person’s conscience or religious beliefs.

 

[Fukwatutalkinwatisaylaw]

Good...

 

[Samori Toure]

This gotta be the dumbest shyt I've ever read on here in my life.

It's also hilarious how many of you have no actual beliefs of any kind

Slavery statutes were enacted by Northern and Southern States. In fact Massachusetts was the first State to enact a Slavery statute in 1621. They already came for Black people friendo.

 

[Elim Garak]

An honest idiot is still an idiot

Clearly but no juelzing so I respect it.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

Slavery statutes were enacted by Northern and Southern States. In fact Massachusetts was the first State to enact a Slavery statute in 1621. They already came for Black people friendo.

I'm not engaging someone as retarded as yourself. I've learned my lesson, trying to talk to white supremacist supporting idiots enough. That original statement is still one of the dumbest things ever written in the history of this board.

 

[hashmander]

Christians are against a lot more than interracial marriage.

another good reason why we shouldn't have laws that allow people to discriminate based on their religious feelings. fukk their feelings.

 

[Wildhundreds]

With all due respect, you're mentioning things that most students of History are aware of. Segregation of races was preached from the pulpit and "supported by Old Testament passages".

Not exactly a reveal. The current topic is squarely about local control of granting marriage licenses to same sex couples.

We know how things work, and can be applied in the future but can we actually stay on topic for once about this?

Post some of these passages and I'll post a contradictory passage because ALL PREACHERS twist the bible to fit a narrative.

 

[Samori Toure]

I'm not engaging someone as retarded as yourself. I've learned my lesson, trying to talk to white supremacist supporting idiots enough. That original statement is still one of the dumbest things ever written in the history of this board.

The original statement was that they had already came for Black people. What the fugg does your dumbass think that slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and all of that shyt was about you dumb b*stard?

 

[DonB90]

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Martin Niemöller is best known for writing First They Came, but he is a complicated figure. Initially an antisemitic Nazi supporter, his views changed when he was imprisoned in a concentration camp for speaking out against Nazi control of churches.

Bruh they been coming for blacks since 1619 in this country. No one has been there for us. No one. I didn't see no rainbow flags in Selma when they unleashed dogs on us. George Floyd and Tyre Nichols weren't murdered in the middle of the street because they were gay. No black man has ever walked into a gay establishment and committed mass murder. This doesn't concern me or any other black man that has to get his mind prepared just to step out the door in America. You doing all this campaigning for a fractional group of sex deviant people who have more rights then even you do, assuming you are black.