Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

You're a c00n regardless how black you are.

Shultz denied everything. He spent the entire exchange denying the existence of systemic white racism.
He tried to use Nigerians, Oprah, ect as proof that this country isn't racist. He deflected the entire time. "It's not racism its classism".

No, a c00n who befriends crackers like Shultz who perpetuates white supremacy has no room to talk about someone who makes a living calling out white supremacy. You're just deflecting from white supremacy with the ad hominem shyt.

you're not even black
what have you even done for black people?

NOTHING

giveme a time stamp of when he tried to deny systemic racism
and yes I didn't agree with his classism excuse of which ive said before

but like I said you're a half cac, you should be looking up to a black man like me. whats more c00ning than having a half cac child like yourself?

 

[Ricky Fontaine]

You keep repeating that you're black
That's clearly false

You've admitted to not doing anything to build the black community yet bash a person who has done far more than you

This clown still at it

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

so tariq was on point with that deportaion thing.... everytime i think hes reaching, a few months later what he says comes true. king flex

really seals the deal for me IMO

 

[KodeBlue]

So what are you arguing here then? You agree with Nasheed and the rest of us.

My argument is against Tariq's hypocrisy as it pertains to white supremacy, not wether or not white supremacy exists.

 

[KodeBlue]

Did not hear him deny the existence of white supremacy throughout the entire exchange? No wonder you have a beef with Nasheed, you're a pet c00n.

Shultz acknowledged that white supremacy exists. He said it twice. Did you listen to the interview?

 

[Gravity]

My argument is against Tariq's hypocrisy as it pertains to white supremacy, not wether or not white supremacy exists.

What hypocrisy? You've spent the entire thread ignoring Shultz's hypocrisy pretending that he was making good point.

Shultz acknowledged that white supremacy exists. He said it twice. Did you listen to the interview?

Yea he acknowledged it only to spend the entire exchange denying it. If he truly acknowledges white supremacy then what was his point in bringin up Nigerians? What was point in bringing up Oprah? What was his point in making the "it's not racism it's classism" argument? There's no point in acknowledging white racism if you're going to dismiss or downplay it. That's a contradiction.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

What hypocrisy? You've spent the entire thread ignoring Shultz's hypocrisy pretending that he was making good point.

Yea he acknowledged it only to spend the entire exchange denying it. If he truly acknowledges white supremacy then what was his point in bringin up Nigerians? What was point in bringing up Oprah? What was his point in making the "it's not racism it's classism" argument? There's no point in acknowledging white racism if you're going to dismiss or downplay it. That's a contradiction.

I felt a way when Schulz said black people from other countries don't have a "victimization" about themselves.

That was an interesting moment...

 

[KodeBlue]

What hypocrisy? You've spent the entire thread ignoring Shultz's hypocrisy pretending that he was making good point.

Yea he acknowledged it only to spend the entire exchange denying it. If he truly acknowledges white supremacy then what was his point in bringin up Nigerians? What was point in bringing up Oprah? What was his point in making the "it's not racism it's classism" argument? There's no point in acknowledging white racism if you're going to dismiss or downplay it. That's a contradiction.

It sounds like Shultz was trying to find the parameters in which white supremacy doesn't engulf. Honestly, that's what I've been trying to figure out as well. Moreover, I'm trying to figure out how Tariq, a successful black man, hasn't fallen victim to white supremacy if he isn't a token, all the while denouncing white supremacy. Does he have a cheat code that no one else knows about? He's too vague, and we need some clarification. He's doing things that shouldn't be allowed in a white supremacist society, and is getting away with it unscathed. Finally, I'm finding it puzzling that many of you haven't picked up in this.

I haven't even touched in the fact that he calls a man crispy because he has dark skin.

Tariq is a walking contradiction.

 

[Gravity]

I felt a way when Schulz said black people from other countries don't have a "victimization" about themselves.

That was an interesting moment...

Why? That's just willie lynch divide and conquer shyt. We are victims and it's only natural that we have a victimized kind of mentality. We've been victimized in ways that many native Africans haven't. They haven't been stripped of their language/culture and identity. The brand of white supremacy that we've been subjected to is different. It's not the victimized mentality that hurts us. It's the deliberate sabotage in every way that hurts us.

 

[Gravity]

It sounds like Shultz was trying to find the parameters in which white supremacy doesn't engulf. Honestly, that's what I've been trying to figure out as well.

This is the question that you need to answer since you're cosigning Shultz's "yea white supremacy exists but..........not really tho" position. You tell me what the parameters are because I say that there are no parameters. White supremacy is ingrained in every aspect of institutionalized society. What doesn't white supremacy engulf in America?

Moreover, I'm trying to figure out how Tariq, a successful black man, hasn't fallen victim to white supremacy if he isn't a token, all the while denouncing white supremacy. Does he have a cheat code that no one else knows about? He's too vague, and we need some clarification.

This is an ad hominem, it's not an argument. If you want to say that Nasheed's success is proof that white supremacy doesn't exist then say that and make that argument. Then against you've already acknowledged that it does exist so if that's the case then you're contradicting yourself. This is why is silly for you to run around as if you've proven some kind of point.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

You're on day 12 of saying stupid shyt

how is that stupid? he married into a white family.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

Why? That's just willie lynch divide and conquer shyt. We are victims and it's only natural that we have a victimized kind of mentality. We've been victimized in ways that many native Africans haven't. They haven't been stripped of their language/culture and identity. The brand of white supremacy that we've been subjected to is different. It's not the victimized mentality that hurts us. It's the deliberate sabotage in every way that hurts us.

stop saying 'we'

you're mixed

you're half cac

this is a convo about black people

 

[Ronnie Lott]

stop saying 'we'

you're mixed

you're half cac

this is a convo about black people

Do you live in the US?

 

[Ronnie Lott]

It sounds like Shultz was trying to find the parameters in which white supremacy doesn't engulf. Honestly, that's what I've been trying to figure out as well. Moreover, I'm trying to figure out how Tariq, a successful black man, hasn't fallen victim to white supremacy if he isn't a token, all the while denouncing white supremacy. Does he have a cheat code that no one else knows about? He's too vague, and we need some clarification. He's doing things that shouldn't be allowed in a white supremacist society, and is getting away with it unscathed. Finally, I'm finding it puzzling that many of you haven't picked up in this.

I haven't even touched in the fact that he calls a man crispy because he has dark skin.

Tariq is a walking contradiction.

More dumb shyt

You must love being wrong

 

[Knicksman20]

Do you live in the US?

It doesn't even matter to me bro. Anyone that aligns or agrees with Schultz is a suspected white supremacist or a straight up c00n & I rarely use that word. I even question CTG for not only putting him on but continuing to associate with him when he's shown what he's about