Tariq is Debating Jared Taylor Live

[Swagnificent]

I'll tell you what I see:
- China rising fast
- India rising fast
- The European countries becoming more and more irrelevant on the world stage.
- Africans (especially Nigerians) being the most successful in terms of education in the USA.
- Nigerians being one of the richest ethnic groups in the USA per capita.
- The rise of the African middle class in Africa.
- Europeans whining, bytching and being frightened by a bunch of ragheads crossing their borders.

Yet i suppose you think this is all a part of 'white supremacy's master plan huh!?

nikkas who believe in countries are so silly.

White supremacist aka Masonic Jews control all those countries indirectly through the monetary system. Holla at me when one of those countries ain't borrowing money from a Jewish owned bank.

All those nations are only slaves of the white supremacists.

 

[Dzali OG]

China is now starting to expand its influence to Africa because they need resources to actually combat white supremacy. They also started a group called the SCO which is an answer to NATO.
White Supremacy still controls most of Africa mentally (bleaching) and physically (coups). Cacs don't control Iran and that's why they are trying their best to start wars with them.
Iran has recently joined the SCO while Turkey is thinking about it. That's why they have become very vocal and disobedient to the US and Europe.

BRAVO!

This man gets it!

Africa is the only ally a nation wanting to fight white supremacy can have. All the other nations....are white.

 

[#1 pick]

Have those criticizing Tariq's Asian argument ever heard of the Bamboo Ceiling? And I believe there's a thread on here referencing Asian scholars, who basically proved Asians were chosen. Yvette Carnell even talked about it.

Yvette stays talking about this. All Black scholars talk about this outside of the diehard democrat types.

 

[Da King]

Asians treat blacks worse than cacs, hope y’all don’t forget that

 

[YouMadd?]

I need to watch this. Jared Taylor is known to be a very smart guy, so props to Tariq for even taking a debate on. However, I've seen really SMART people get destroyed by Jared Taylor in a debate.

I wish actual smart black intellectuals were the ones representing us. All of our orignials have passed...

 

[Dzali OG]

Lol at the supremacist acting like he didn't understand what Tariq said. Its not rocket science.

If you own a huge majority of the overall wealth which white supremacist do(who are most of the billionaires and millionaires). check they have the money.
And who has the weapons? Check.

This means that anything anyone else does is ALLOWED.

Remember this people. This is why when you get the black folks talking about "we need our own economics." its true. but that will not solve problem #2 that I stated above. Which means, any time that those white supremacist desire to knock your rich a... off. They could and have(black wall street. proves this theory perfectly.)

Boooooom!

Excellent! Especially the part about economics NOT being the answer to our problems in America. We had our economics together in a few places and cacs came and took our shyt.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I debated his bytchass on the China investing in Haiti thread. How the fukk you pro-black and support America's white supremacist foreign policy? Makes no god damn sense. The US has done do much damge to Haiti that it is time for haiti to move away from US influence and try new waters. America is on decline and it is time for black nations to move forward the post American world. And on the Tariq vs Jared Long debate what was the point of this? Why are we still debating with white people? What do we gain from this? White people will go through mental gymnastics to justify why they hate us.

Why would I support China investing in a country they don't give a fukk about?

The USA has a population that at least could benefit from those relationships.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

His American stanning should be a red harring to ANYONE to see through his fake Tariq stanning. He "supposedly" watched 1804 and yet and still wonders why people want America to stay far away from Haiti? This guy must thing the Coli as a collective has a IQ below freaking 70.

Last I checked, black America was the wealthiest representation of the African diaspora.

Play dumb if you want to.

White supremacists LOVE it when yall act like yall dont want to be here. You're doing their job for them.

You stay letting white supremacists punk you out of your citizenship

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Oh you mean YOUR narrow and rigid line of thinking? And the fukk can you stan the fukk outta Tariq Nashheed while also stanning the fukk outta America? shyt doesn't make any sense whatsoever...

Have you ever thought that I don't "Stan" Tariq Nasheed?

I mean if you really cared that much, you could easily see the multiple times I've disagreed with him and flat out repudiated certain positions he's had?

Nah, fukk that...lets just frame everyone you disagree with any toss nuance aside

 

[Swagnificent]

You mad?

1. I'm black

2. I've expressed criticisms of Hidden Colors on specific contents

3. I'm not obligated to fukking comply with your narrow or rigid line of thinking. Kick rocks.

No you're not. What you said in that post criticizing Hidden Colors exposed you as non-black. How come? Because what you said is exactly what non-blacks say whenever they encounter TRUE African/black history. They are offended by the REALITY that black people not only colonized the entire planet but are the originators of civilization and did in fact rule over Europe for 500 years. So they start with the whole Moors weren't really black, neither were the Egyptians. And even if they were, they weren't the same type of black people as you "n1ggers" so get over yourselves.

That's literally the cac playbook 101. I've encountered that same logic a million times on the internet. It always starts out with denying that the Ancient Egyptians or Moors were black in the first place. Then once they are flooded with an avalanche of evidence that the Ancient Egyptians and Moors were black in the way of written accounts from contemporary Europeans as well as pictographic evidence, they change the issue. They go from they weren't black to they weren't the same type of black as African Americans. The argument you went to when you said Nigerians ain't the same as Ethiopians. The classic, even if the Moors and Egyptians weren't your type of black so "STFU n1ggers".

You are non-black. So please stop pretending.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

No you're not. What you said in that post criticizing Hidden Colors exposed you as non-black. How come? Because what you said is exactly what non-blacks say whenever they encounter TRUE African/black history. They are offended by the REALITY that black people not only colonized the entire planet but are the originators of civilization and did in fact rule over Europe for 500 years. So they start with the whole Moors weren't really black, neither were the Egyptians. And even if they were, they weren't the same type of black people as you "n1ggers" so get over yourselves.

That's literally the cac playbook 101. I've encountered that same logic a million times on the internet. It always starts out with denying that the Ancient Egyptians or Moors were black in the first place. Then once they are flooded with an avalanche of evidence that the Ancient Egyptians and Moors were black in the way of written accounts from contemporary Europeans as well as pictographic evidence, they change the issue. They go from they weren't black to they weren't the same type of black as African Americans. The argument you went to when you said Nigerians ain't the same as Ethiopians. The classic, even if the Moors and Egyptians were black they were your type of black so "STFU n1ggers".

You are non-black. So please stop pretending.

Tariq is wrong about HIV, and various threads on here have challenged the notion of pre-columbian contact, which itself is something i'm not fully convinced of.

Deal with it.

Oh and I've PROVEN I'm black. Kill yourself.

 

[Swagnificent]

Asians treat blacks worse than cacs, hope y’all don’t forget that

That's because they are acting as agents of white supremacy. Asians in Asia who never met a black person in their lives typically have the most bigoted opinions on black people. Why do you think that is? Because they are flooded with imagery from the American media that portray black people in a negative light.

I don't think people realize just how pervasive American media and its imagery is throughout the world. Everything we see here in America through the media is also seen throughout the world. So whatever views the media here pumps out regarding black people is what people around the world see. And its what forms their views. That is why white supremacy is GLOBAL.

 

[Swagnificent]

Tariq is wrong about HIV, and various threads on here have challenged the notion of pre-columbian contact, which itself is something i'm not fully convinced of.

Deal with it.

Oh and I've PROVEN I'm black. Kill yourself.

No you're not. A black person is not OFFENDED by black history that is counter to the slave narrative propagated by white supremacy. Stop changing the subject to the pre-columbian contacts. In the post you made criticizing Hidden Colors, you specifically focused on the issue of the Ancient Egyptians and Moors being represented as black. You claimed that the Moors and Egyptians weren't black. You specifically referenced North Africans being different from other Africans. And then you went further and said Nigerians were different from Ethiopians. The classic they weren't black but even if they were, they weren't your type of black.

That is how white supremacists think. In fact, this is white supremacy 101. First its to deny facts. Then once you can't deny the facts you create fictitious arguments. That's how the Hamitic Hypothesis originated. In the 1800s the White Supremacists of that time had to explain away the fact that all the ancient sources from Greece and Rome described the Ancient Egyptians as black. So they created the Hamitic Hypothesis. This fictitious race of "dark skinned Caucasians" that came into Africa mixed with the native "Negroes" and helped them create the civilizations found in Africa like Egypt. Now there was obviously no evidence for any of this. But it was a way for white supremacy to be saved. Because how could white people be superior to black people if according to the first great white civilization (Ancient Greece) they learned everything they knew from a black civilization (Ancient Egypt).

The Ancient Greeks were VERY CLEAR. They said they owed everything they knew to Ancient Egypt. And they said the Egyptians of that time were "black skinned with wooly hair". They were clear that the Ancient Egyptians were from the same origin as the "Ethiopians". And to the Greeks, Ethiopian was NOT someone from the modern day country of Ethiopia but rather a general term to describe anyone with dark skin AKA Africans. Once again, your post criticizing Hidden Colors for this point makes zero sense unless you have an agenda to deny that Ancient Egypt was a black civilization. And its impossible for me to fathom a black person having an agenda to deny that Ancient Egypt was black. Even c00ns aren't gonna do that. Only non-black people who need to believe in white supremacy since it puts them one rung up the racial hierarchy are motivated to deny the blackness of Ancient Egypt.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

No you're not. A black person is not OFFENDED by black history that is counter to the slave narrative propagated by white supremacy. Stop changing the subject to the pre-columbian contacts. In the post you made criticizing Hidden Colors, you specifically focused on the issue of the Ancient Egyptians and Moors being represented as black. You claimed that the Moors and Egyptians weren't black. You specifically referenced North Africans being different from other Africans. And then you went further and said Nigerians were different from Ethiopians. The classic they weren't black but even if they were, they weren't your type of black.

That is how white supremacists think. In fact, this is white supremacy 101. First its to deny facts. Then once you can't deny the facts you create fictitious arguments. That's how the Hamitic Hypothesis originated. In the 1800s the White Supremacists of that time had to explain away the fact that all the ancient sources from Greece and Rome described the Ancient Egyptians as black. So they created the Hamitic Hypothesis. This fictitious race of "dark skinned Caucasians" that came into Africa mixed with the native "Negroes" and helped them create the civilizations found in Africa like Egypt. Now there was obviously no evidence for any of this. But it was a way for white supremacy to be saved. Because how could white people be superior to black people if according to the first great white civilization (Ancient Greece) they learned everything they knew from a black civilization (Ancient Egypt).

The Ancient Greeks were VERY CLEAR. They said they owed everything they knew to Ancient Egypt. And they said the Egyptians of that time were "black skinned with wooly hair". They were clear that the Ancient Egyptians were from the same origin as the "Ethiopians". And to the Greeks, Ethiopian was someone from the modern day country of Ethiopia but rather a general term to describe anyone with dark skin AKA Africans. Once again, your post criticizing Hidden Colors for this point makes zero sense unless you have an agenda to deny that Ancient Egypt was a black civilization. And its impossible for me to fathom a black person having an agenda to deny that Ancient Egypt was black. Even c00ns aren't gonna do that. Only non-black people who need to believe in white supremacy since it puts them one rung up the racial hierarchy are motivated to deny the blackness of Ancient Egypt.

1. You dont speak for every black person
2. Africa is pretty big. Lets not take agency away from the fact different groups of people MAYBE weren't where they said they were
3. I like how you act like arabs or berbers don't exist or something

 

[Swagnificent]

1. You dont speak for every black person
2. Africa is pretty big. Lets not take agency away from the fact different groups of people MAYBE weren't where they said they were
3. I like how you act like arabs or berbers don't exist or something

Once again stop taking us to different conversations. We can discuss the Arabs and Berbers in many other threads. Same with pre-columbian contacts. If you've been on this site before you know I'm well versed in all those topics and have engaged is vigorous debate on them many times before. In this thread, I am reacting SPECIFICALLY to the post you made criticizing Hidden Colors. Your post on that topic was very clear. You said the Moors weren't black but rather "North African". And according to you "North Africans" are either not black or at the very least not the same type of black as whoever you were arguing. Your post saying "Nigerians are different than Ethiopians" clearly indicates this sort of logic. I'm guessing you are one of those people that believe unless the black civilization in question is from West Africa that a black person in America can't identify with it (pretty silly logic that never applies to white people vis-a-vis Ancient Greece or Rome). Then you denied that Ancient Egypt was black by stating that the Arab presence there goes back a long time. That's a pretty incredible statement for anyone with any knowledge to make considering the fact that the earliest date of an Arab presence in Egypt is 700 AD while Ancient Egypt as a civilization thrived over 3,000 years earlier in 2500 B.C.

As I stated in my previous post. The pictographic and written evidence regarding the blackness of the Moors and Ancient Egyptians is OVERWHELMING. If you really are black, then even a cursory investigation of this topic would have led you to a wealth of information on this topic. The blackness of the Moors and Egyptians is now mainstream knowledge among most black people so it really serves no purpose to rehash all those arguments right now. My argument with you is why you felt the need to "debunk" it. I say this because when I first encountered the topic of the blackness of the Moors and Egyptians, I was not driven to immediately reject it or to try and find a white narrative "debunking" it. I went to the source materials. I read Anthony Browder's book on Nile Valley Civilizations. When I read his reference to Herodutus saying the Ancient Egyptians were "black skinned with wooly hair", I went to my local library and found the book Herodutus allegedly made that claim. I went to the page cited in the footnotes and found the exact quote. That is all I needed to validate the credibility of "Afrocentric" authors on this subject. I didn't need to go and find a white person to tell me why they were wrong in thinking black skin and wooly hair didn't necessarily mean the Ancient Egyptians were black.

I just find it hard to believe that a black person would make the arguments you made. They were CLASSIC arguments made by non-black (in most cases whites) who are motivated to deny any evidence counter to the prevailing narrative by white supremacists that black people have contributed nothing of note to world history and were certainly not at the center of great empires like Ancient Egypt and the Moors.