Survivors of Aurora shooting ordered to pay $700k to theater.

Yesterday

Banned
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
1,847
Reputation
-2,130
Daps
6,182
No
I think it was dumb to sue the theater over what someone else did but for the jury to agree to make the survivors pay the theater's legal fees is messed up. smh
Why is it messed up?

I agree it sucked that people who went through that traumatic experience now have to pay up, but that's what they ass get for trying to take advantage using the legal system
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,046
Reputation
8,801
Daps
138,657
This SOP as far as I know when you lose a case

Secondly, why should the theater be held responsible for a maniac coming in and shooting everyone dead.

I empathize with their loss but the theater shouldn't be liable in my opinion and they rightly lost the lawsuit and As a result they have to pay the legal fees.
 

Kaypain

#SuicideGang
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
35,043
Reputation
9,013
Daps
93,342
Wait a minute, let me get this straight...They are charging people for getting shot? :what:

Am I reading this right? :what:

Get sued for trying to watch a movie and get shot at brehs...

This shyt makes no sense to me at all, I must not be reading this right :mindblown:
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,046
Reputation
8,801
Daps
138,657
The theater def could have prevented it

Easily


By installing metal detectors and having people checked as they enter


How the fukk u side with a major corporation

fukking right wing ass nikkas
If I'm a psycho id just shoot the rent a cops and waltz through the metal detectors. :sas1:

Unless they have on site swat or police force that isn't going to prevent shyt. Their best bet is s panic button of sorts.
 

Gonzo

Banned
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
6,180
Reputation
-167
Daps
26,846
Reppin
USA
The theater def could have prevented it

Easily


By installing metal detectors and having people checked as they enter


How the fukk u side with a major corporation

fukking right wing ass nikkas

You're a retard. Anyone could hit up any place. You've never heard of a shooting at a movie theatre before. Where else are you going to put up checkpoints and metal detectors at Einstein?
 

Yesterday

Banned
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
1,847
Reputation
-2,130
Daps
6,182
Per the articles, both the plaintiff interviewed and the woman who refused the deal said the purpose of the lawsuit was not money but to enact security measures in theaters, the deal offered by Cinemark did not adequately meet their demands

So it wasn't greed
nikka please, if it wasn't about the money, WHY DID THEY INCREASE THE AMOUNT IN THE LAWSUIT??

Incase you didn't know, plaintiffs always say "it's not about the money" because they don't want to come off as using a tragedy more monetary gain. Let's not play stupid.
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,479
Daps
136,083
"The chain's lawyers at the time told a judge the money is needed to cover the costs of preserving evidence from the theater (pictured), retrieving and copying records, travel and other expenses."


While I agree with the ruling, there's a certain irony in reading about a theater needing money to cover anything in consideration of how much it costs to enjoy the cinematic experience in 2016. Went and saw Don't Breathe on Tuesday. Ticket was like $13, got some chicken tenders and a large drink for like $13. Damn near a $30 experience :leostare: In hindsight I should have looked for a torrent and cooked my own chicken.
 

Kaypain

#SuicideGang
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
35,043
Reputation
9,013
Daps
93,342
why the fukk do the survivors gotta pay for lawyers if they werent on trial... like really this shyt aint making no fukking sense :dwillhuh:
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,046
Reputation
8,801
Daps
138,657
"The chain's lawyers at the time told a judge the money is needed to cover the costs of preserving evidence from the theater (pictured), retrieving and copying records, travel and other expenses."


While I agree with the ruling, there's a certain irony in reading about a theater needing money to cover anything in consideration of how much it costs to enjoy the cinematic experience in 2016. Went and saw Don't Breathe on Tuesday. Ticket was like $13, got some chicken tenders and a large drink for like $13. Damn near a $30 experience :leostare: In hindsight I should have looked for a torrent and cooked my own chicken.
They make no money on ticket sales as far as I know. That is why your chicken tenders and drinks were 13 dollars in the first place. :lolbron:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
102,486
Reputation
13,704
Daps
299,390
Reppin
NULL
I hate to side with a major company in one of these rulings, but this is what these people get for being greedy. The theater itself isn't the reason Holmes shot the place up and nothing was gonna prevent it unless everybody was psychic.

$150,000 is a lot of money to turn down.
fukk these people :yeshrug:

turned down 150k, making the theater have to incur the costs of 700k to defend themselves. its not 'paying the theater 700k', its reimbursing what they lost

and think of the last time you went to the movies: when the fukk was there two swat team dudes at the theater as guards? :what: what the fukk could they have done to block an armed dude with assault rifles?

0 sympathy here
 
Top