No the fukk it's not.Chess move. If this removes GOP resistance to his judicial selections it's a good deal.
Welcome to TheColi. Where your contemporaries are here to remind that you are currently and already a low quality poster mere months into your time here. Smarten up dumbassThe news is already covering it less by august or september, this will be gone from front pages and dem voters will forget, what people will vote on is inflation, gas prices and the supply chain issues. The dem voters simply dont vote in the midterms, republicans always show up no matter what
No the fukk it's not.
I see it as simple numbers. If you can get 10 judges for the price of 1, I'd take it and move on to the next thing on the list
Won't somebody think of institutions Jack!?!?
Who the fukk still has trust in public institutions?Won't somebody think of institutions Jack!?!?
a republican i know said she supported overturning roe because of late-term/ex-utero abortions and folks terminating a ridiculous amount of pregnancies....so there are other people who believe this????
he support to overturning Roe is flawed imo. she was exaggerating when she said women are deciding they dont want their babies when it's too late (late-term and ex-utero) Doctors support late-term when the pregnancy is a health risk to the mother. hey do not support ex-utero termination. And I've never heard of any woman getting 50 (this is the number she used) abortions. her reasons were absurdBelieve what? There are 2 things here:
1. She's against late-term abortion
2. there are a ridiculous number of pregnancies being terminated.
1. I have no idea how often women have late-term abortions. I'm with you that this woman may be exaggerating things. Or she's just really deadset against it. But from what I understand, it's only done when the mother's life is in danger.
2. In 2020, there was just over 930k abortions in the US.