Supreme Court appears poised to rule for parents who objected to LGBTQ content in elementary schools

[MischievousMonkey]

How could even practically opt out of having books featuring gays in your school library

Like when the kid enters the library, an alarm rings and the librarian hits a button under the desk and all the gay shyt gets covered with pictures

Or all the gay books are stashed in a forbidden gay section with a lock and a key

Or the kid is barred drom the library so there is no risk he might get infested

This is ridiculous

 

[sayyestothis]

We were in a good public school area but moved to a private catholic school to avoid all this mess...and we aren't catholic either but there's no rainbow thru the hallways...

 

[MyApps]

Maybe you should step your reading comprehension game up. Go back and read what you bolded and what i replied to after, with sources.

The internet is more than just web browsers and social media has been around for 2 decades; it's no longer in an infancy stage.

Maybe you should understand that you are trying to argue points that require parental experience of which you have none. Sources can be manipulated based off motives. Empirical evidence is far more important in a argument for this topic.

And stating the social media has been around for 2 decades is like saying the internet has been around since the mid 80s. Technically true, but not what we consider social media of our time.

You may have the last word. Since you "couldn't care less" about this topic, there is no need for people invested in this issue to continue a back and forth discussion with you.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Yes, which is why parents who do not desire their children to be immersed in the LGBTQ+ culture should have an option to "opt out". The parents are not asking that it all be removed, they are asking that their children not be forced to participate in it.

I dont like them wrapping it in religious freedom.

Just say “we ain’t with the shyt” and keep it moving

Making it religious just adds to the paperwork doing the deflection instead of addressing the real issue

 

[Seoul Gleou]

Maybe you should understand that you are trying to argue points that require parental experience of which you have none. Sources can be manipulated based off motives. Empirical evidence is far more important in a argument for this topic.

I did post empirical evidence. Maybe you mean anecdotal evidence. In which case, that would be the exact opposite of what to utilize for an argument on this subject.

And stating the social media has been around for 2 decades is like saying the internet has been around since the mid 80s. Technically true, but not what we consider social media of our time.

In other words, social media has been around for 2 decades. Technicalities dont make something any less true or false.

You may have the last word. Since you "couldn't care less" about this topic, there is no need for people invested in this issue to continue a back and forth discussion with you.

Agreed. I didn't quote you, you quoted me