"Super Squads" are killing the NBA

[Amare's Right Hook]

It's always been that way, you just have more media.

 

[u mad bruh bruh]

Nba always been that way b

60's lakers,celtics,warriors,sixers

70's had the most parity ever

80's sixers,lakers,celtics,pistons,rockets

90's bulls

Most of these teams had multiple hall of famers

Yeah well back then you didnt have SUPERSTARS demanding trades to teams that are already playoff bound

 

[Smalley Biggs]

Someone just starting watching the NBA

"outside of 6-7 teams, who else has a shot at winning the championship"

yeah, for three straight years only one team had a shot at winning the championship (Jordan's last 3 finals wins). No other team in the league had a shot at beating them and everyone knew that. Be grateful that there's 6-7 teams now.

 

[NatiboyB]

if u want to see balanced mediocrity stick to ncaa ball

and coach K seem's to be brining em in for the 1 and out by the flock. a new starting 5 every year.

 

[ecnirp1]

it's deflating the value of an nba championship to be honest.

every all star/superstar in the league is gonna get one at some point as long as they follow this trend.

 

[HiphopRelated]

it's deflating the value of an nba championship to be honest.

every all star/superstar in the league is gonna get one at some point as long as they follow this trend.

not true, and even if it was, that's pretty damn close to "parity"

6 teams with a legit shot is more than I can remember in a while

 

[u mad bruh bruh]

Too bad Karl Malone and Charles Barkley didnt demand a trade to the Bulls

 

[jwinfield]

yeah, for three straight years only one team had a shot at winning the championship (Jordan's last 3 finals wins). No other team in the league had a shot at beating them and everyone knew that. Be grateful that there's 6-7 teams now.

I remember the Jazz being favored that last series.

Even one of the Chicago papers had them winning.

 

[Loose]

yeah cuz its not like that been the mo of the nba last 50 years

the difference is most ancient super teams were through the draft because of less teams. this is a lot different terrible comparison.

 

[HiphopRelated]

the difference is most ancient super teams were through the draft because of less teams. this is a lot different terrible comparison.

who gives a shyt?

Cause Bron was too good too soon and Durant couldn't get wins in years with good drafts means Durant is supposed to reap benefits down the road and Bron can't?

 

[god shamgod]

jerry west,elgin baylor and wilt chamberlain all played on the same team in the late 60's

This isnt new

Super teams are good and bad for the nba

 

[Loose]

who gives a shyt?

Cause Bron was too good too soon and Durant couldn't get wins means Durant is supposed to reap benefits down the road and Bron can't?

I dont even know what in the hell you're talking about.

 

[Lefty Gunz]

Nba always been that way b

60's lakers,celtics,warriors,sixers

70's had the most parity ever

80's sixers,lakers,celtics,pistons,rockets

90's bulls

Most of these teams had multiple hall of famers

Difference is these teams were put together through the draft and maybe one trade.

 

[HiphopRelated]

I dont even know what in the hell you're talking about.

What's not to get?

Durant was followed by Westbrook and Harden

Lebron was followed by Luke Jackson and playoffs

 

[JohnStarksMiddleFinger]

But why didn't they let Chris Paul join a super team.