Johnny Kilroy
79 points in 1 quarter
Man, you're still not reading well. You're grossly missing the point of why I wrote that to go for easily mockable elements of that post.
I could just point you to what @Gus Money quoted from it and leave it at that, but I'll restate it for you: The reason I wrote about my own case is exactly because its just one case. And it's only one case within a cultural structure that affects all individual cases. Now they don't affect them in the same way, and depending on your situation, it will affect one more than another. I just happened to be one that had very fortunate circumstances, but I can tell you many other cases in which it didn't work out. Some even from private schools just like mine, with situations similar to mine. Not because they didn't want to, but because their situation didn't allow them to take the type of path that I took.
(Note: "How many poor students have Agoraphobia?" is the kind of reductive garbage that I'm talking about. Seeing as it and other mental illnesses in the poor and the black often go undiagnosed because of a lack of means and an unwillingness to consider mental illness, you, nor myself and anyone else more than likely don't know the exact number or even a good approximate number, for that matter.
Oh, and those two cases that you tried to narratively relate, really weren't related. Public school wasn't for me because they aren't really built for the type of person I was at the time, while my Agoraphobic case came when I was 20-21. And if you actually knew anything about the phobia, studies show that it usually doesn't occur in people younger than about 18. Don't assume what you don't know or haven't researched.)
I'll write it again: No one's saying not to tell someone to succeed in their situation. Just that it's ignorant to blithely do so, while ignorant of factors that may lead to them not doing so. Also, you're missing the point of why we keep saying "forget your own case" beyond what I wrote above: Because you have to apply what I wrote above in aiding others, whether it be through academia, in a social work setting (two situations I'm quite familiar with), one-on-one, counseling, whatever, you have to be able to think both the individual line and the differing elements of the social line(s) at the same time and combine them when the need arises. Thinking one, as you're doing, and subsuming or eliminating the other as unimportant or unnecessary, is just as harmful as not thinking it at all.
Ok and just like you found a way to deal YOUR specific situation, each individual needs to find a way to deal with their individual situation.
Telling me percentages doesn't tell me a damn thing because you're reducing every individual person to a number or statistic.
Now if you're willing to take the time and break down every individual case and explain why they did or didn't succeed then your argument would have merit. Until then you're just spewing meaningless numbers that represent something but don't really mean anything to any individual person.
It's just like in sports. "He hasn't missed a FG all year..." then he misses. What does every other kick before that really have to do with that individual kick? You still gotta go through the motions.
Last edited by a moderator: