And how is what ws written above differ from the light moving at different speeds depending on the object's motion? (it does not)
Isn't the speed of light supposed to be constant? (yes)
I am not saying both ideas are not true. I am saying they can't BOTH be true. None of these details are the point I am making. Again, Svience contsins dogma and true believers fight tooth and nail to debunk alternative ideas, just like with religion. Basically a critque of them hqving calculated some size that was supposed to be the maximum size of an object. No laws have been defied. The size of your imagination has been defied. You didn't think it could be but it is. Anyways, looking at these "facts" from uncanny angles is the very spirit of science, not the wikipedia entry. They re-write the "laws" all the time.
The speed of light is not always constant, it changes depending on different mediums it goes through. the C in formulas refers to the speed of light in a vacuum space is so much like a vacuum that typically scientists don't need to keep track of these variations, but it is not ALWAYS constant like you say, which totally kills your entire argument.