String Bell's Sheisty Thoughts

EBK String

Better Ring String
Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
31,368
Reputation
6,579
Daps
306,266
So are you saying, outside of God, human beings have no mechanism for creating moral imperatives?

I'm pointing out how subjective morality leads to hypocrisy. You cannot say a non normative sexual practice like homosexuality is OK while saying another non normative sexual practice like incest is not. Based on what?

You call someone a bigot because they feel homosexuality is nasty, but the same people turn around and say siblings hsbing sex Is nasty.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
34,407
Reputation
6,706
Daps
159,089
Reppin
Golden Era/Drama free Zone
I'm talking about incest nobody said anything about pedophilia.
Incest happened, in the bible and in Darwinian evolution

we would not be here without it.

However today it is taboo because we know more about the genetic defects that often occur when large communities engage in such acts (There are some people who think the Arab world is backwards today because of it)

Gavon the racist thoughts on Islamic inbreeding for example



Plus its just nasty, thats why folks don't do it. Eating bugs is nasty also. You don't need anyone to tell you its nasty
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
49,567
Reputation
-2,432
Daps
239,897
Nobody has been able to refute my statements with logic. Just a bunch of ad hominem attacks calling me dumb or the logic dumb, and making emotional arguments about me making the comparison. You can't deal with the hypocrisy that subjective morality inevitably leads to.

There is nothing logical about comparing gay sex between strangers with gay sex between family members.


If that's the case, then hetero sex between strangers would be the same the same as hetero sex between family members.


Stop using the term "logic"
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,753
Reputation
5,825
Daps
113,870
I'm pointing out how subjective morality leads to hypocrisy. You cannot say a non normative sexual practice like homosexuality is OK while saying another non normative sexual practice like incest is not. Based on what?

You call someone a bigot because they feel homosexuality is nasty, but the same people turn around and say siblings hsbing sex Is nasty.
The human existence is subjectivity.

Incest was ok in the Bible as well until it wasn't, so I suppose God can be subjective as well.

Nobody can speak to how someone feels. There are established laws around these as subjects however, and consequences.
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,739
Reputation
6,530
Daps
78,707
Still no rebuttal to OP's logical conclusion

If you have no objective morality and the basis is purely liberal individualism then what really is the difference between incest, polygamy and homosexuality?

There is literally none.

It's purely based on the consent of 2 or more adults.
 

EBK String

Better Ring String
Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
31,368
Reputation
6,579
Daps
306,266
There is nothing logical about comparing gay sex between strangers with gay sex between family members.


If that's the case, then hetero sex between strangers would be the same the same as hetero sex between family members.


Stop using the term "logic"

saying something isn't logical without any evidence or facts does not make it illogical. You might as well said nothing.
 
Top