is it possible that they shot too high by going for 12, and they should have just went with 10 and then raised it again after 10 worked out?is it possible that they shot too high by doubling the min wage in 5 years, and they should have just went with 12 and then raised it again after 12 worked out?
id rather have 12 actually happen than 15 "get fought for" and not happen. no one would have got away with voting no for 12
that would be...things changing.How much y’all wanna bet that nothing changes. Manchin votes for the relief bill but gets his wish by cutting the tax break and keeping it at $400 ending in august.
All this drama for no reason.
that would be...things changing.
If manchin gets rid of the tax break on UI I am going to lose my fukking mind
Edit: Holdup. Is the tax break on 2020 taxes or 2021 taxes
i mean apparently its already 12 in arizona, thats sinemais it possible that they shot too high by going for 12, and they should have just went with 10 and then raised it again after 10 worked out?
id rather have 10 actually happen than 12 "get fought for" and not happen. no one would have got away with voting no for 10
i dont get the napoleon reference, but to say "15 is low but adequate" given the effort's status on march 5th is embarrassingLooks like we have found Saajar Enjeti brehs. You know damn well they aren’t coming back to anything if 12 per passed. 15 is low but adequate.
Left wing Twitter has gone off the deep end
End of the day this bill is putting $12,800 in the pocket of the average middle class family with 2 kids, not including the ACA subsidies, and UI expires in 10 days. This is not a position driven by logic.
i dont get the napoleon reference, but to say "15 is low but adequate" given the effort's status on march 5th is embarrassing
15 doesnt have a pathway. it sucks, but tell me youre not really pretending otherwise