the cac mamba
Veteran
why havent you stated what pelosi had to lose by taking the 1.8 from mnuchin?But that actually happened. And they didn't care.
is it because the answer is nothing?
Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread
- Thread starter wire28
- Start date
is it because the answer is nothing?
Json
Superstar
The best way to obstruct Biden for gains in 2022 is with those two seatsnoits not michigan. its fukkin georgia
Possibly losing a GOP stronghold is a big deal.
them boys got no tact, have fun gettin bent over my mitch (again)
same dudes that couldnt understand why i said dems gave away their leverage months ago and been tryna juelz any reason they can to make up for being wrong about not taking 1.8 trillion
same dudes that couldnt understand why i said dems gave away their leverage months ago and been tryna juelz any reason they can to make up for being wrong about not taking 1.8 trillion
the cac mamba
Veteran
key word is possibly. its very unlikely that the republicans lose two senate seats
biden won GA by 10k, but 20k republicans in the atlanta metro voted perdue/biden
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
Yet another topic we've been over, because he's the f*cking Treasury Secretary, he has no authority to make any deals - even if he's doing so at the behest of the president because Congress has to draw up and ratify said bills. I asked you this before and you ducked it, is there ANY deal that Mnuchin could put together that would not require McConnell?so why did mcconnell warn mnuchin not to make a deal with pelosi
the cac mamba
Veteran
well this post is dead wrong. mcconnell warned mnuchin not to make the 1.8 deal with pelosi, because he was terrified of his majority having to defy trump right before the election
i mean if youre just gonna play stupid then never mind
I told you. Stop being stupid.
If posi agreed to the deal, the. TRUMP comes out saying the checks need to be bigger, he would get this good press bump heading into the election.
No bill gets passed. Trump gets reelected and here we are again, but worse.
dudes think its some kinda revelation that the republicans downvoted a bill right after an election
why do republicans oppose 2,000?
Wouldn’t the small government, less taxes party be for people getting the money instead of the government?
Because they view the government giving money back differently than not collecting.
But why tho?
it’s crazy I haven’t seen any argument by the republicans for denying direct payments
it’s like they’re only purpose is to object to whatever the Dems are passionate about at that moment
Because they feel like payments are meant to keep us closed.
"People don't need payments, they need to get back to work."
It's that simple.
Json
Superstar
Where are you getting that 20k number for Perdue/Biden for Republicans?
the cac mamba
Veteran
so trump gets reelected off NOT delivering on a bill he signed off onI told you. Stop being stupid.
If posi agreed to the deal, the. TRUMP comes out saying the checks need to be bigger, he would get this good press bump heading into the election.
No bill gets passed. Trump gets reelected and here we are again, but worse.
youre falling all over yourself to defend this asinine position
come on breh. youre a better poster than that
the cac mamba
Veteran
wow
the cac mamba
Veteran
saw a post in here with an article that said 20k republicans in metro GA voted for perdue and biden
seems reasonable to me but i cant link you the post