Stephen "Breadman" Edwards breaks down Muhammad Ali's resume

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
The question that was asked:
What do you think of Floyd Mayweather’s comments where he basically discredited Ali’s resume in order to enhance his own? I know you think he’s an all time great but I just don’t get that. Ring Magazine just did a piece on the best fighter of the modern era and was number 12 I believe. Why does he rate himself so high, what am I missing? Floyd claimed that Ali never beat Ken Norton, lost to a fighter with seven fights and had no defense when he got old. If you were playing Devil’s Advocate what would say to counteract Floyd’s claims.

And here's Bread's response:
I loved the Ring piece. I am a list guy myself I love reading ranking list…


I honestly wish Floyd would be more humble when it comes to fighters of yesteryear. I understand where he ranks himself and he has a right to do so. But while doing so he may not want to nitpick other great fighter’s resumes. He should leave that up to the list makers and just be humble.


I saw a facebook post a few months ago where an interviewer asked Mike Tyson was he better than Ali. Tyson simply said no. Then he started crying and told the interviewer there is no one like Ali.


Floyd did make the comment that Ali never beat Ken Norton, he lost to a guy with 7 fights and he laid on the ropes when he lost his legs. I thought it was a little tasteless but he did have some true points. But maybe he shouldn’t say those things, I don’t know. Floyd does have a right to his opinion….


But in a debate I guess you could say Ali did beat Ken Norton. Regardless of how controversial the fights were he beat him. They were no more controversial than Floyd’s fights with Castillo and Maidana. And yes Ali did lose his legs but he was the toughest SOB in the history of the game. And yes he did lose to Leon Spinks who was 7-0 but he beat 4 Olympic Gold Medalist in Floyd Patterson, Joe Frazier, George Foreman and Leon Spinks, no one history has done that in the pro ranks. He also beat Archie Moore, Bob Foster, Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier, Ken Norton, George Foreman and Floyd Patterson. Which makes him the only heavyweight in history to beat 7 HOF fighters. 5 of them were all time greats.


The biggest statement that can be made about Ali that can’t about Floyd is that Ali fought his most threatening contemporaries and Floyd did not. Anyone can make the glass half full or half empty when it comes to a fighter’s resume that’s why fighters have to be careful when picking apart the resumes of their fellow fighters. But no one not even Ali’s biggest detractors can nitpick his competition. Ali fought everybody.


Even the guys who gave him trouble like Ken Norton he often fought them 2 or 3 times. He was the GUN of all Guns. People don’t realize this but Henry Cooper who dropped Ali early in his career got a rematch with Ali, he also gave Floyd Patterson and Sonny Liston rematches. He fought Joe Bugner twice and Bugner scored a knockdown against him. He fought George Chuvalo twice who was insanely tough. The kicker is Ali fought Chuvalo in his home country of Canada, twice!!! Did I mention he fought Ken Norton 2 of those times in Southern California and that is where Norton was from!


We all talk about his rematches with Frazier but we forget how many fighters he fought more than once to clear up any doubts as to who was the best. Muhammad Ali is revered by the historians for a reason. He was absolutely insane as to who he would fight, where he would fight them and when he would fight them. I get choked up thinking about him in that way. He looked pretty but he was truly an animal. I have never seen a competitive streak like his. I’m literally freestyling off the top of my head and I have another great Ali stat.


In his first 2 title tries against Sonny Liston and George Foreman he had to go up against all time great fighters where he was more than a 4 to 1 underdog in both fights. Think about that for a second when you look at his resume. There has not been a fighter as special as Ali, who has had the odds against him by as much as he had and succeeded so often.


When a critic brings up a shortcoming of a great fighter I always think did this short coming stop him from coming up big in his big fights. For example people like to say Ali didn’t have technical skills, he couldn’t body punch and once he got old his defense was poor. So I say did his lack of technical skills allowed him to beat superior technical fighters like Bob Foster, Floyd Patterson and Sonny Liston. He didn’t body punch but he scored late stoppages over Sonny Liston, George Foreman, Joe Frazier and Floyd Patterson. His defense suffered as he got older but he was only stopped once and that was a corner stoppage in his next to last fight. How ironic?


If we were applauding Floyd Mayweather or Bernard Hopkins as great fighters in this era and someone said well they never score kos. That comment would only be relevant if we said Mayweather and Hopkins was the best ko artist of this era. Maybe I view things differently than others….


By the way Ali was 3rd on that list you are talking about in the Ring. In my opinion that’s about right.


http://boxingtalk.com/pag/article.php?aid=26889



Ali Boombaya!

:lawd:
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
good article :obama:

I didnt include "his" name in the title, so that this thread isnt ruined like the other 2:snoop:


Funny, this thread aint gonna get too many hits because of it, when it's a very thorough and accurate breakdown of what Ali did/accomplished.


he beat 4 Olympic Gold Medalist in Floyd Patterson, Joe Frazier, George Foreman and Leon Spinks, no one history has done that in the pro ranks. He also beat Archie Moore, Bob Foster, Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier, Ken Norton, George Foreman and Floyd Patterson. Which makes him the only heavyweight in history to beat 7 HOF fighters. 5 of them were all time greats.

:wow:
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
@Newzz im not saying Ali is not immune from criticism..there's stuff you can nitpick about with him but when it comes to his overall career and ppl having the nerve to say Floyd's comparable? thats where i say fukk outta here :camby:

Ali basically went through the gauntlet and "who's who" of Heavyweight Boxing history during it's peak/prime/golden years and survived to become the undisputed best at that time. There isnt a fighter who was fighting at that time that he ducked/dodged/missed. He even fought in lesser fighter's backyards:wow:


He took L's, but the majority was when he was already at the end of his career (he went on the 1-3 streak over his last 4 fights before calling it a career).


I saw a facebook post a few months ago where an interviewer asked Mike Tyson was he better than Ali. Tyson simply said no. Then he started crying and told the interviewer there is no one like Ali.

:wow:
 

krackdagawd

Inspire.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
45,737
Reputation
8,246
Daps
139,906
Reppin
Another Gold Medal


drake-dancing5.gif
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,923
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
One sentence really stands out to me from that article:
The biggest statement that can be made about Ali that can’t about Floyd is that Ali fought his most threatening contemporaries and Floyd did not.
That right there automatically seals the deal when discussing Ali's greatness compared to someone like Floyd. You can't be considered "The Best Ever" when you did not fight the best of your era. So being undefeated is nice but having a good record against the best of your era holds more weight to me.
 

GREENandYELLOW

2x...and defending
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
3,681
Reputation
990
Daps
9,406
One sentence really stands out to me from that article:

That right there automatically seals the deal when discussing Ali's greatness compared to someone like Floyd. You can't be considered "The Best Ever" when you did not fight the best of your era. So being undefeated is nice but having a good record against the best of your era holds more weight to me.
I agree. I know Floyd fans dont accept this, but there are a lot of fights Floyd never made that would have made his resume historically much better.
Now I dont think Floyd was ducking people because he was scared and sometimes timing influenced a lot of things, but there are still a lot of "what ifs" regarding who he could have fought over his career.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
In his first 2 title tries against Sonny Liston and George Foreman he had to go up against all time great fighters where he was more than a 4 to 1 underdog in both fights

And he won em both:wow:


When a critic brings up a shortcoming of a great fighter I always think did this short coming stop him from coming up big in his big fights. For example people like to say Ali didn’t have technical skills, he couldn’t body punch and once he got old his defense was poor. So I say did his lack of technical skills allowed him to beat superior technical fighters like Bob Foster, Floyd Patterson and Sonny Liston. He didn’t body punch but he scored late stoppages over Sonny Liston, George Foreman, Joe Frazier and Floyd Patterson. His defense suffered as he got older but he was only stopped once and that was a corner stoppage in his next to last fight. How ironic?


Exactly. I never understand it either and Ali STILL beat them with these "flaws".
 
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
509
Reputation
150
Daps
956
Reppin
Hayward CA
@Newzz im not saying Ali is not immune from criticism..there's stuff you can nitpick about with him but when it comes to his overall career and ppl having the nerve to say Floyd's comparable? thats where i say fukk outta here :camby:
Really though! Floyd never had to fight a 15 round fight in a sweat shop in the Phillipines
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
3,313
Reputation
690
Daps
5,374
I agree. I know Floyd fans dont accept this, but there are a lot of fights Floyd never made that would have made his resume historically much better.
Now I dont think Floyd was ducking people because he was scared and sometimes timing influenced a lot of things, but there are still a lot of "what ifs" regarding who he could have fought over his career.
pretty much..floyd choose money over legacy.
 
Top