Curry
No
Curry
This is the same thing that happened last year. Curry is completely taken for granted and even looked at as a disappointment because he doesn't seem to be as good as he was in the reg season.
This is the same thing that happened last year. Curry is completely taken for granted and even looked at as a disappointment because he doesn't seem to be as good as he was in the reg season.
Draymond had one good game. Klay had one good game and it was a loss. Who else do we have? Shaun Livingston because of a good game 1? 11 ppg Iggy? Curry would not be forgiven for some of the performances Klay and Draymond had in this series. Must be nice.
Should the MVP award be handicapped and graded on a curve though?Klay and Draymond aren't the 2 time MVPs
Expectations matter... you know this man.
If Shumpert dropped 41 we would be having a completely different convo than LeBron doing it.
And Curry has been a turnover machine throughout this series (dumb turnovers trying to be cute). He hasn't been playing well.
Should the MVP award be handicapped and graded on a curve though?
Maybe last year it was. Other than that the best player always gets it even if they shoot like shyt or aren't as good as usual. I don't think Curry's finals performance this year is very memorable but its the finals. No one is balling out. Of the guys on his team,he has been the best.Its not about should... it most definitely is...
I wish this board would stop doing this.
You don't compare players by what areas they're better at on some number grading scale (1 for rebounding, 1 for shooting, 1 for passing etc etc). You weigh what impact they have on the game with the skillsets they have. Going on your logic, both Westbrook and Rondo are better than Curry. When we know that isn't the case.
Saying that Curry is a better rebounder than Zeke doesn't mean a cotdam thing - neither player has any significant impact on the glass.
It's not about the "comments" it's about his reasoning. He uses Curry's low FG% as reasoning to say he had a poor game, yet tried to excuse Kobe when he has a low FG%.
Is this where I say you're just being "sassy"?
He defended him multiple times all throughout that game. Yes Klay was mostly on him, but again Curry actually did a better job than Klay did. Nevertheless the point was, Kyrie wasn't burning Curry like @CantStop made it seem he was.
Curry forced Kyrie into tough shots and to give up the ball on certain possessions too. He wasn't a non-factor. Why do you only tell half the story?
His decision making was about the only good thing in this game. I've already been over the game again. He was making the rigth decisions on offense, the team just weren't hitting their shots (that includes him too). They were 16-43 on uncontested shots with Curry being the main playmaker - obviously he was the main reason why they had all those uncontested shots.
You're absolutely clueless. I knew you'd bring this up.
When I say main generator of their offense I mean he was the one who orchestrated it; running the sets/actions, finding open players or creating secondary assist opportunities - which led to all those open shots.
What the fukk are you arguing about then? If you're here to argue over semantics of he didn't play well but he didn't play bad, what was the point in you joining the conversation? The margin of how I think he played and how you think he played is probably within proximity yet you're in here arguing some nonsense for whatever reason to get my attention. Just like you do with @Malta.
Who told you it was your duty to correct every comment made by posters morning through the late night? Do you take time out to eat or have quality time with friends and family?Tell these dudes to stop posting dumb shyt and I'll stop typing "lengthy" posts.![]()
RIP to that slack jawed he-she you called "dad" tho. Heard he died on his knees with his mouth open saying he's do anything to liveGood to see @Gravity still alive, was worried about him because of the shooting in Orlando.
Stephanie can never be compared to lebron