Steph Curry Got Them Under Armour Numbers Going Nuts...

CSquare43

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
14,881
Reputation
10,169
Daps
53,706
A friend/acquaintance works for VFC (Vans) and shared this:



Looking at the athletic footwear and activewear categories in the first half of the year


The first half of 2019 proved challenging for sport footwear (defined here as the aggregate of sport lifestyle, performance, work / occupation, and outdoor footwear, from The NPD Group’s Retail Tracking Service). Sales of sport footwear for the first half of 2019 declined in the low-single digits.

Nike brand sales grew in the low-single digits for the first half of the year, as did Brand Jordan. Adidas, Converse, Sketchers, New Balance, Asics and Under Armour all saw declines in the first 6 months of the year based on NPD’s covered markets.

Vans sales grew about 25 percent; Brooks grew about 10 percent. Puma and Fila also experienced nice growth. Merrell, Keen and UGG all showed declines.

The top-selling footwear styles during the first half of 2019 in dollar rank order are:

Nike AIR MAX 270, Nike TANJUN, JORDAN 6 RINGS, Nike AIR FORCE 1, JORDAN VI, JORDAN IV, Adidas NMD R1, Chuck Taylor OX LOW, Vans WARD, Nike REVOLUTION 4.

(Note: eight of these shoes fall into the sport lifestyle category; one falls into the skate category; and one falls into the running category.)
 
Last edited:

CSquare43

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
14,881
Reputation
10,169
Daps
53,706
I feel like this(vans) is more of a fad than anything. Sure they improved but from what?

:salute:


I hear where you're coming from. BUT...Vans is a 50+ year old company that has definitely been in/out of style multiple times and that history suggests it will continue to be the case. With that said:


How Vans Shoes Became A Quiet Fashion Juggernaut

From 2015: Vans is owned by the publicly traded clothing giant, VF VFC +0%Corp., which also has such brands as The North Face, Wrangler and Timberland. Back when VF bought Vans for $370 million in 2004, Vans was publicly traded, too. And fading fast. Between 1993 and 2003 it struggled to turn a profit, and by the end it was losing $30 million a year. Sales had stagnated at around $330 million.

VF expects 49-year-old Vans to do $2.3 billion in sales this year (2015), up from around $2 billion last year, making it the fastest-growing part of VF.



Vans shoes maker VF's quarterly revenue tops estimates

From 2018: Apparel and footwear company VF Corp. on Friday reported first-quarter revenue that topped Wall Street estimates, on demand for Vans shoes and North Face apparel as well as higher online sales.



What is Driving Van's Multi-Billion Dollar Demand?

From 2019: The recent quarter revenue reports from VF come not long after Piper Jaffray released its bi-annual “Taking Stock with Teens” report. After surveying more than 8,600 U.S. teens about their spending habits, the investment bank found that Vans – which first eclipsed outwear giant North Face as VF’s top-selling brand in March 2017 and now makes up almost 25 percent of VF’s annual sales – was the fastest-growing brand in terms of finding teens’ favor. Over all, Nike remains in the top spot, but Piper Jaffray noted that “staggering increases came from females, where Vans unseated Nike as the No. 1 brand among [upper-income] females.”

The results have been significant and consistent. For instance, Vans saw impressive double-digit growth between 2010 and 2014, and then sales hit $2 billion for the first time ever. It was 2015, and Vans was on track to meet its five-year growth plan, which was announced in 2012 and called for $1 billion in revenue growth, up to $2.2 billion by 2016.

When the time came to assess the result of the plan in 2016, Vans’ sales had not only met the goal, they had surpassed it, reaching $2.3 billion in revenue. As for its gross margins, the money the company makes after subtracting the cost of goods sold, those have grown from 48 percent in the early 2000’s to 60 percent.



Vans is a very interesting business case study in part because of their trendiness and how they have gone in/out of style multiple times but have (finally?) taken a leap that may keep them out of that up/down cycle.
 

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
56,440
Reputation
3,821
Daps
168,988
That’s a good look. Could have easily gone with Jordan brand or Nike
 

boskey

Top Rankin
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,068
Reputation
3,566
Daps
62,071
Vans is a very interesting business case study in part because of their trendiness and how they have gone in/out of style multiple times but have (finally?) taken a leap that may keep them out of that up/down cycle.
lol did you go to business school too? We def did a Vans case study once when I was in school.

Yeah Vans is a dope story they used to be a distant 2nd or 3rd in skateboarding shoes behind Airwalks lol, strictly for whiteboys who skated. Now I see all kids of black kids wearing them. They come back like every 10 years in cycles like Chucks. The Pack made them hot for the hip hop community...
 

CSquare43

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
14,881
Reputation
10,169
Daps
53,706
lol did you go to business school too? We def did a Vans case study once when I was in school.

Yeah Vans is a dope story they used to be a distant 2nd or 3rd in skateboarding shoes behind Airwalks lol, strictly for whiteboys who skated. Now I see all kids of black kids wearing them. They come back like every 10 years in cycles like Chucks. The Pack made them hot for the hip hop community...


Just been in business for a long time now...

:old:


But yes, really interesting story. Their transformation has been incredible.
 

jaguar paw

Music Junkie
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
28,865
Reputation
6,651
Daps
105,836
Reppin
Optimistic But I Got Hands Tho
Yes he does...

And from the UA reports:



Under Armour Reports Fourth Quarter Net Revenues Growth Of 31% And Full Year Net Revenues Growth Of 28% (NYSE:UA)

25% YoY growth? Steph's gonna be alright financially..... :takedat:


In terms of timing, the probe—according to the Journal—began in 2017 shortly after the company’s sales growth started to decelerate. What the probe seems to indicate is management stretched numbers are far as they could to present a rosier picture of growth late 2016.

But growth didn’t last. Slowing sales growth and product inventory turmoil crushed shares. That isn’t news to investors well aware of Under Armour’s recent history. The stock hit more than $50 in 2016, then bottomed out at less than $12 a share in November 2017.

The 2017 drop caused turmoil in the c-suite as well. Under Armour named a new CFO in December 2017, David Bergman. He was promoted to the top finance spot from within the company. The Journal reported that the probe began in the middle of 2017, so many of the issues may predate the current financial leadership.

:lolbron:
 
Top