Statistically, Curry had the worst Finals performance of any MVP in NBA history
- Thread starter Archangel
- Start date
Lol. Breh don't even start talking about grabbing and holding. That's all the fukking dubs do
I've backed myself up, and yet you seem to think that I'm making all this up. What better way to prove you wrong by stating that other posters saw this too?Calling for back up. How about you back yourself up.
Naw bruh we ain't talking about double standards. I didn't respond to a reference to double standards in general or the number of double stanards. We talking a specific double standard that was flat out wrong.
.
That specific double standard wasn't flat out wrong. No matter how much you want to spin it. You clearly do NOT know what you're talking about.
Not full strength with your top 3 guys out there is not the same or anywhere close to not healthy with Timofey Mosgov as your second leading scorer. There is no way around this. You can be as indignant as you want, bring up Bron all you want, call for as much back up as you want but you were wrong there. It happens.
That is not the point and you know it. It's the fact that dudes say the Warriors can't beat healthy teams/ a full strength Cavs, and then use this recent Finals series as evidence of this when the Warriors weren't at full-strength themselves. Like I said -
This isn't about what would've happened if LeBron lost - it's about what would've happened if the Warriors won. LeBron and the Cavs are being crowned (and rightfully so, as every championship team should) because they won under said circumstances. If the Warriors would've won under the same circumstances (Cavs up 3-1 when both teams at full strength, only for the league to suspend a Cavs player in G5 which is then compounded by injuries to TWO Cavs players, with the Warriors benefiting off this to win in G7) - this board would've branded their title with another asterisk.
Cavs win under the circumstances that took place = this board crowns them
Warriors win under those same circumstances = this board says it was rigged and they were lucky the Cavs had a player suspended and players injured, else they would've lost as the Cavs proved to be the better team when all things were equal (both teams at full strength)
You are completely drowning in revisionism if you do not see this or the fact that a good majority of this board doesn't really care who or whether or not which Warriors players were out or injured.
That point is relevant to this conversation because you don't know what was said about this Warriors team. It's completely relevant.Naw breh trying to harp on that one point from the past that I admitted wrong on is clearly a sign of being in your feelings. It's funny because you are actually wrong about what I was admitting fault on. Regardless, it has nothing to do with this discussion but since the tables are turned and I am calling you out on something you wanna cling to that until back up arrives
What is wrong with you? For the 100th time I'm not saying this. Get a clue breh.
I've backed myself up, and yet you seem to think that I'm making all this up. What better way to prove you wrong by stating that other posters saw this too?
That specific double standard wasn't flat out wrong. No matter how much you want to spin it. You clearly do NOT know what you're talking about.
That is not the point and you know it. It's the fact that dudes say the Warriors can't beat healthy teams/ a full strength Cavs, and then use this recent Finals series as evidence of this when the Warriors weren't at full-strength themselves. Like I said -
This isn't about what would've happened if LeBron lost - it's about what would've happened if the Warriors won. LeBron and the Cavs are being crowned (and rightfully so, as every championship team should) because they won under said circumstances. If the Warriors would've won under the same circumstances (Cavs up 3-1 when both teams at full strength, only for the league to suspend a Cavs player in G5 which is then compounded by injuries to TWO Cavs players, with the Warriors benefiting off this to win in G7) - this board would've branded their title with another asterisk.
Cavs win under the circumstances that took place = this board crowns them
Warriors win under those same circumstances = this board says it was rigged and they were lucky the Cavs had a player suspended and players injured, else they would've lost as the Cavs proved to be the better team when all things were equal (both teams at full strength)
You are completely drowning in revisionism if you do not see this or the fact that a good majority of this board doesn't really care who or whether or not which Warriors players were out or injured.
That point is relevant to this conversation because you don't know what was said about this Warriors team. It's completely relevant.
What is wrong with you? For the 100th time I'm not saying this. Get a clue breh.
Okay so you don't wanna admit you were very clearly wrong. Okay. No point in going around in circles any longer.
The only one that is wrong here is you. I honestly can't believe I'm even having this discussion. You're basically telling me all that I've argued for/against and what I've seen on this board for the last two seasons is a figment of my imagination. It doesn't exist. All those polls, threads and posts don't exist.
Rationale goes out the window when the Warriors are discussed on here. I'm done trying to fight it.You STILL DON'T GET IT.
Like I said, I wouldn't expect you to know this because you haven't been paying attention to what's been said.
I've already explained to you the double standard that posters use against this Warriors. If you don't want to believe it, that's on you. If you would've seen the amount of posts that have accused the league of rigging games for the Warriors (allowing them to get away with fouls on both ends) and not apply the same to every other team than you obviously haven't been paying enough attention. Just like they highlight every opponent's injuries that favors the Warriors chances, but don't do the same when the Warriors are suffering from similar fate. There's a lot of double standards being applied when it comes to this team.
@Regular_P, @threattonature and @<<TheStandard>> will back me up on this too, because they've seen they've seen the amount of irrational nonsense that has been posted about this team.
Fair enough, but would you agree with this assessment (obviously I'm not talking about every single poster on this board) -Rationale goes out the window when the Warriors are discussed on here. I'm done trying to fight it.
This isn't about what would've happened if LeBron lost - it's about what would've happened if the Warriors won. LeBron and the Cavs are being crowned (and rightfully so, as every championship team should) because they won under said circumstances. If the Warriors would've won under the same circumstances (Cavs up 3-1 when both teams at full strength, only for the league to suspend a Cavs player in G5 which is then compounded by injuries to TWO Cavs players, with the Warriors benefiting off this to win in G7) - this board would've branded their title with another asterisk.
Cavs win under the circumstances that took place = this board crowns them
Warriors win under those same circumstances = this board says it was rigged and they were lucky the Cavs had a player suspended and players injured, else they would've lost as the Cavs proved to be the better team when all things were equal (both teams at full strength)
This is the flaw in your bullshyt argument. It's not the same circumstances. This everybody keeps trying to tell you. Forget that dumbass hypothetical "if the Cavs had a player suspended" scenario you made up. Bogut missing 2 games and Iggy playing thru back spasms in one game isn't comparable to Kyrie llayong in all but one game and Love missing the entire series. There's is no double standard because it's not the same circumstances. The trying to make this stupid ass argument because you're only making yourself look dumb. It's pathetic at this point, Just like @houston911 slack jawed crackhead c*nt mother.
You don't get it. Stop quoting me.
All facts. Nobody will admit it, but that is exactly what would have happened.
Yea yea, nobody that sees through your bullshyt "gets it".
