Lol I just didn't want to offend you because that's wasn't my intention, but anyway hol up you just posted a pictured of a guy who fits the type that I literally described that women would prefer over fake build-a-guy (e.g., naturally fit, attractive and presumably worked hard for his) to prove your point?
The fact that you didn't google and use any fake build-a-guys as an example of how you don't care about how a man achieved his looks, speaks volumes about your real taste. But I'll let you cook G....
Speaking from the perspective of a guy who is naturally athletic, the difference in real muscle and fake muscle would be hilariously wide in terms of function if you saw them in the gym. In real life guys who are physically fit have strength, stamina, cardiovascular endurance and low body fat %(which mean vascularity)... all are things women like that are
beyond the physical aspect of appearance. Something a fake muscle guy, would not have nor would he be able to physically do the things a real physically fit guy would be able to do for you despite appearing as if he could. Hell you may even be physically stronger than he is and he wouldn't be able to protect you in a fight.

Do you not care about that or think about how a man putting in blood, sweat and tears for hard work to pay off, means from a personality perspective? This is deeper than just looks homie.
I've been told by most women who have a preference for physically fit men (or just require men to have a broad back and shoulders) that they care about what these physical attributes represents as well as the actual looks of it, but apparently you don't I guess. You're one of the rare non-sentimental wimminz who don't care about what any of your favorite physical attributes on a man represents