You got a thread on the front page, you made it my dude :wow; But it is hilarious that they put the user's avi up there so it's Boosie in the corner
lmao
Yeah, I don't think all of them made it back tho.
Sooo....no talk on Kiev's gradual descent into Mad Max beyond Thunderdome status??
- Thread starter 2Quik4UHoes
- Start date
lmao
Yeah, I don't think all of them made it back tho.
How easy is it to prove that this story is a complete lie and that all other stories saying that Putin dreams for a recreation of the Soviet Empire? http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...adimir-putin-call-breakup-ussr-greatest-geop/
Simply recall the facts.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/part-ii-vladimir-putin/
WALLACE: The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in the liberation of Eastern Europe. Yes? But last week you called the collapse of the Soviet Union, "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century." What does that mean?
TRANSLATOR: The United States carefully guards and protects the interests of its people. The United States protects the interests of its citizens. Just imagine that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, 25 million Russians living in the now-independent states found themselves beyond the Russian territory. Twenty five million turned out to be foreigners of Russia. Isn't that a tragedy? They just woke up one morning and learned that they had nothing to do with Russia anymore. They lived in other states, and so they have to become accustom to life in those countries as ethnic minorities. I can assure you they face significant problems in many of those countries.
Take for instance the Baltic states. Do you know that there are some IDs there in which on the line for "nationality," it says, "Non-citizen." Modern citizenship laws operate with such notions as citizen, foreigner, a person with double citizenship, an expatriate. For someone who lost his or her citizenship, who are those people? This is an absolute breach of the modern humanitarian law. Also, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, people lost all of their life savings. So definitely, in the light of the collapse of the social system, this was a great tragedy for millions of people.
Simply recall the facts.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/part-ii-vladimir-putin/
WALLACE: The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in the liberation of Eastern Europe. Yes? But last week you called the collapse of the Soviet Union, "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century." What does that mean?
TRANSLATOR: The United States carefully guards and protects the interests of its people. The United States protects the interests of its citizens. Just imagine that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, 25 million Russians living in the now-independent states found themselves beyond the Russian territory. Twenty five million turned out to be foreigners of Russia. Isn't that a tragedy? They just woke up one morning and learned that they had nothing to do with Russia anymore. They lived in other states, and so they have to become accustom to life in those countries as ethnic minorities. I can assure you they face significant problems in many of those countries.
Take for instance the Baltic states. Do you know that there are some IDs there in which on the line for "nationality," it says, "Non-citizen." Modern citizenship laws operate with such notions as citizen, foreigner, a person with double citizenship, an expatriate. For someone who lost his or her citizenship, who are those people? This is an absolute breach of the modern humanitarian law. Also, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, people lost all of their life savings. So definitely, in the light of the collapse of the social system, this was a great tragedy for millions of people.
I want a war to breakout
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/08/w...raine-said-to-be-born-in-shadows.html?hp&_r=0
As long ago as 2008, when NATO leaders met in Bucharest to consider whether to invite Ukraine to begin moving toward membership, Mr. Putin bluntly warned that such membership would be unacceptable to Russia, presaging the strategy that appears to be unfolding now.
According to a diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks, Mr. Putin even questioned the legality of the Soviet Union’s transfer of the region to the authority of what was then the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1954. “If we add in the NATO question and other problems, the very existence of the state could find itself under threat,” Mr. Putin said, according to the cable, written by Kurt Volker, the American ambassador to NATO at the time.
By who?
They not about to do all that.
How about no? If US directly helps Ukraine against Russia, it's going to create problems in future when we invade other countries. Russia might even help Iran with nukes.
yes like i said in my original post
And I'm disagreeing with you.
ok let's do this slowly. i said they would not go to war but if they did the US would win. you said "They not about to do all that" which i assume means they won't go to war which is in agreement with my original statement. so where's the disagreement ?
I stop following the lies and bullcrap. What has happen so far since Friday?
don't know
by the look of things both sides moving weapons and flexing while borack and putin make phone calls back and forth making secret deals...
don't know
by the look of things both sides moving weapons and flexing while borack and putin make phone calls back and forth making secret deals...
Ukriane just has to pick the worser evil. Obama like you can have the Public Relations Putin but behind the scenes we know whats good.