itsyoung!!
Veteran
my rent per month is $8300, you sure?My system cost more than your rent this month.
I spend your monthly income in 1 hour at a baccarat table in vegas, scram on this subject
considering I'm not like everyone else on this forum: I'm less than an hour away from you in normal bay area traffic.
what are you implying here ? speak with ya chest on this
You stay posturing some online position thinking talking down to everyone like you're the big bad heel of the Arcadium is getting you some clout when all it's getting you is pats on the back by the nikkas everyone laughs at.
nominated arcadium poster of the year 5 years in a row
I didn't call you a fukking idiot for skewing your xbox fanboyism into not understanding a basic question. Nope. I asked for clarification and you decided to be a c*nt.
The obsessive stannery is hilarious considering the property you chose to jump out the window over is Lego. you know. A third party that consistently puts out games on licensed products EXACTLY like this. Star Wars. Harry Potter. Marvel. Literally the biggest IPs in media. Lego has a better review track record by itself than the entirety of Xbox AND Sony's first party titles. If they are wanting to make a Lego game using a Sony property... how is that a negative exactly?
Literally any Microsoft property would be happy to get a Lego game and you fukking know it. But I guess it's only lolLego when it's Horizon?
I dont even own a xbox I will always be PC gang Lego does make good games. Thats the entire point. That Horizon and Sony been flopping so hard that they had to run to Lego to save them,
Its not a negative except to Sony stans.
Last edited: