Sony stansNah, what is like is for you to shut up.
Sony stansNah, what is like is for you to shut up.
I was team 360 for the first three years of that generation, only reason I switched to ps3 was because I had 3 RROD situations, 2 of them being after GTA4 had released and I couldn't play it for like 2 months and it pissed me off. No, xbots weren't giving me a hard time because I was one of them.But that’s what stands out to you.
2 years of sony not dominating and a few games you missed out on before PS3 released, and you felt it emotionally when the guys on sohh gave you a hard time
Both companies had fukkery at launch, sony launching $200 more than the 360 with worse performance, and the 360 with its ridiculous failure rate.Microsoft made up some ground with the 360 due to sony’s fukkery, and a 1 year head start but they still never had a chance worldwide. PS3 sold more than 360 from the day the PS3 released.
I'm pointing back at that generation because yall have this weird idea that microsoft could never be competitive with Sony like Sony is some impervious force in the industry.I’m not even sure what you are pointing back to in the 360 generation that microsoft should do that they aren’t doing now.
If the ps3 was selling more than the 360 how do you explain multiplats selling far better on the 360. You can look at 3rd party games and the difference was drastic.Microsoft made up some ground with the 360 due to sony’s fukkery, and a 1 year head start but they still never had a chance worldwide. PS3 sold more than 360 from the day the PS3 released.
PS3 clearly sold more hardware than 360.If the ps3 was selling more than the 360 how do you explain multiplats selling far better on the 360. You can look at 3rd party games and the difference was drastic.
Call of duty was regularly doubling the sales of the ps3 port.
Battlefield 3
- 1. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (Activision, Xbox 360) - 4,200,000
- 2. Call of Cuty: Modern Warfare 2 (Activision, PlayStation 3) - 1,870,000
- Xbox 360: 2.2 million
- PlayStation 3: 1.5 million
Those are 2 examples but it was like this for every multi platform game. The 360 dominated that generation, the ps3 never closed the gap on software even at the end of the generation.
Either way, console wars drives your misconception of what happened then.I was team 360 for the first three years of that generation, only reason I switched to ps3 was because I had 3 RROD situations, 2 of them being after GTA4 had released and I couldn't play it for like 2 months and it pissed me off. No, xbots weren't giving me a hard time because I was one of them.
Console warzAfter i bought a ps3 i always talked about how garbage it was compared to the 360, online was trash and every 3rd party game looked and played worse on it.
I remember laughing at Sony stans acting like Lair was a good game after the patch, how haze was gonna be a halo killer, pretending uncharted 1(trash) was better than gears of war, how Warhawk wasn't a flop.
I was there for all of it.
Money is king. $200 more and launching a year later is how 360 made some progress.Both companies had fukkery at launch, sony launching $200 more than the 360 with worse performance, and the 360 with its ridiculous failure rate.
Explain how numbers work breh.The ps3 was not selling more than the 360 since release, they had to bundle ps2 sells just to make it look good, word to @PS5 . The ps2 was still selling a shyt load in poorer countries where Sony conveniently made up the difference while Microsoft dominated all the markets that mattered outside of Japan.
No PS3 had caught up and surpassed 360 before PS4 released.If you look at the final numbers at the end of that generation, the 360 was ahead of the ps3 in units sold. The ps3 didn't pull ahead in sells until after the ps4 was released, and microsoft had stopped support for the 360 2 years before then, and they were only dropping kinect games by that point.
No, you are wrong. i provided the links in the other post. In some instances PS3 sold more software. Online shooters 360 had the advantage for obvious reasons. Everything else was a bit different.The ps3 NEVER surpassed the 360 in software sales, probably because a big chunk of people only bought the ps3 because it was the cheapest Blu ray player at the time, they weren't buying games for the shyt.
If sony drops another Late console that costs $200 more, I’m sure Microsoft would be very competitive in console sales that gen.I'm pointing back at that generation because yall have this weird idea that microsoft could never be competitive with Sony like Sony is some impervious force in the industry.
But that RROD also contributed to 360 sales numbers big too. Remember @MightyHealthy went thru like 10 of emIt would have been even worse if Microsoft didn't release faulty 360s at the start of the generation because Xbox was still outselling the ps3 even when they were breaking down like clockwork
A lot of misinformation from both sides. I'll start with you. Xbox you forget gave 1 billion to repair any 360 for the first 4yrs (3yrs plus 1yr warranty) which they replaced for free and they didn't count as new sales. The only company to get away with new sales cheats is Sony which I'm about to breakdownBut that RROD also contributed to 360 sales numbers big too. Remember @MightyHealthy went thru like 10 of em
I know I had Three of em
But games is what makes the system at the end of the day and that with the price drop is how Sony caught up
Best Xbox system was the OG IMO, so much exclusive heat
We all we got!!!!A lot of misinformation from both sides. I'll start with you. Xbox you forget gave 1 billion to repair any 360 for the first 4yrs (3yrs plus 1yr warranty) which they replaced for free and they didn't count as new sales. The only company to get away with new sales cheats is Sony which I'm about to breakdown
@MeachTheMonster is incorrect about ps3 outselling 360 even tho that is the popular narrative Sony created and the media repeats. It's Sony manipulated because they manipulated the numbers by counting ps2 sales as ps3 sales. This is how Sony overtook the 360 in sales which was a running lie that was a popular news story and the fan boys of course ran with it and still run with it.
It's ironic rekkapryde mentions he had 3 systems of Xbox but won't mention how many ps2s he had? Or that Sonys PS2 defects was not only way worse than the 360 launch. Sony didn't do anything about it until 5yrs after launch after getting sued worldwide for it. They didn't replace your system, you was just assed out. Ppl didn't buy expensive warranties for consoles back then because typically they worked without issue (cartridge era we didn't have these concerns)
And as I've famously preached, Sony knew, I was working at what is now a GameStop, they said they wasn't going to do anything about it on some fukk it type shyt. I been team Xbox ever since
Look what it took for them to compete. Sony had to decide to do a really boneheaded thing and make a $600 home console. That seriously hamstrung them at the start. They also rushed the 360 to market to make sure they had time alone before Sony hit.I don't know why yall keep running with this false narrative that Microsoft couldn't keep up with Sony with the 360.
The final numbers for both systems is 87 million for the ps3 and 85 million for the 360. 3rd party games sold better on the 360, Xbox exclusives sold better than ps3 exclusives. Sony had to combine the sells of the ps2 with the ps3 just so it didn't look like they were being outsold as much as they were for majority of that generation, xbots were always bringing up that fact whenever numbers were released. The 360 outsold the ps3 in the U.S. and the EU for the entirety of that generation. Microsoft literally stopped supporting non kinect projects for the last few years of that generation, while Sony dug their heels in with exclusive titles, which is when Sony managed to finally close the gap.
This narrative that Microsoft couldn't compete with Sony is a flat out lie.
I bought a PS3 at launch and consistently said it was better than the Xbox 360. Owned both and still stand by that. The modern Sony we have today and the style of games they produce was forged in the PS3 generation. These huge single player story focused 3rd person camera games became a focus then. Microsoft back then even was focused on competitive multiplayer games.If you were around when sohh existed, you know that place was dominated by xbox. Ps3 brehs couldn't catch a break for atleast half the generation, how Microsoft is treated is how Sony was treated back then. I know for a fact @winb83 remembers all of this, that how I know he's full of shyt acting like Microsoft couldn't compete. He said they made the kinect because they couldn't keep up with Sony, but in reality they did it because they were winning and didn't even see Sony as competition anymore, they wanted that wii market.
Better how? It wasn't stronger, madden was 30fps for the first 2yrs. As for fringed during the ps3 era?I bought a PS3 at launch and consistently said it was better than the Xbox 360. Owned both and still stand by that. The modern Sony we have today and the style of games they produce was forged in the PS3 generation. These huge single player story focused 3rd person camera games became a focus then. Microsoft back then even was focused on competitive multiplayer games.
Again my argument is that if you're the #1 brand in the traditional home console market and you're firing on all cylinders and not out here fukking up nobody is going to take that from you. If you don't give gamers and developers a reason to leave you like Nintendo did or like Sony did in a single generation they ain't leaving.