Struggle devs.Polygon: ”Much has been said about the fact that the PlayStation 4 version of the game runs at a native 1080p, and while that may be true, the game did struggle to maintain a steady frame rate, especially in hectic multiplayer matches. The PS3 version of the game ran into similar problems, whereas the Xbox 360 version maintained a steady 60 frames per second.”
IGN: “On the current-gen versions Ghosts looks nearly identical, though I did encounter occasional framerate issues during the single-player campaign on PS3 and PS4.”
Joystiq: ”A key pillar of the Call of Duty experience has always been rock-solid 60 frames per seconds gameplay. On Xbox 360, Ghosts maintains this mandate. The PlayStation 4 version, however, has noticeable technical issues, sometimes slowing to a crawl, particularly during set-piece moments with multiple effects. One specific moment I was able to replicate multiple times on PS4 was a campaign scene that ran smoothly on Xbox 360 and PS3, while the game chugged On PlayStation 4. These frame rate hitches happen throughout the campaign on PS4 and, in a series known for its Hollywood-inspired bombast, it detracted from the experience.”
1080pbut Struggle Frameratessounds like a great experience
You seem to be very opinionated, yet when others tell of they opinion, like no xbox exclusives hVing better graphics than ps3 exclusives...they are "delusional stans"..you kill me dude. This ignorance you pull takes away from your credibility. It's like xbox stanning is religious to you..That's a damn lie y'all keep telling. There is no game on ps3 that can do what halo 4 did. It would be impossible.
Y'all try to point to uncharted/TLOU but those are very limited games with small hallways and arenas. They are in no way comparable to Halo
Also, why is halo 4 the only title you can bring up that supposedly is something that can't be done on the ps3? We got plenty...god of war..naughty dog games...etc that can't quite be fukked with
:unfukkwitable: