Why would there be a Steve Austin Ruthless Aggression episode when he had a grand total of TWO matches during that era and wasn't an active competitor... Ruthless Aggression literally started after the PPV that he left WWE weeks prior to. You ain't really makin' this a "point", are you 
I've seen nikkas pick some weird hills to die on but this might be the tallest hill yet.
Die on a hill?
fanboy ass nikka say what?
......what point im trying to make?
What is the question the the thread is asking breh?
Why in the world would Vince book Austin to job to brock with no build on raw?
The answer
Because AUSTIN WASNT HITTING ON shyt at the time and the fact this nikka has no ruthless aggression episode proves it....all his Attitude era contemporaries are featured tho, aint they
WWE had the future on deck and Austin wasn't in any future plans, NONE
Nobody has pointed me to one thing Austin was doing that warranted him not doing the job to Brock, NOT A SINGLE ONE!!!!
Just come with a bunch of "he was the Man from my childhood so he should be treated better" ass responses...like some damn fanboys clutching a Austin 3:16 my buddy doll
So lemme do it again
Why in the world would Vince book Austin to job to Brock with no build on raw
the answer/My point
Because AUSTIN WASNT HITTING ON shyt at the time, so why would Vince NOT ask him to do it?
gimme a reason why.....other than
"bu bu but he was a big star
, he deserved better
, they could've did this that way
, they should've did that this way
..bu bu but i love stone cold"
Vince gave him a choice...get with the program...or get lost
This is Fact
And which one did he choose?
Factual non fanboy answers only please
nikka went home and called them!!!!!
They aint call him
They was gonna let his ass sit in Texas and move right on without him
.....and now that we see what the Ruthless Aggression Era was all about with the perspective of hindsight....there's a reason there was no Stone Cold Steve Austin episode
...
