So We Really Gotta Get A 5th String QB Huh....2023 49ers Offseason Thread

[Dat916nigga]

Nah people are just seeing an idiot coach not adjusting to QB that is not Lamar Jackson or Tebow. An idiot that didn't play him sparingly his rookie year so he can get acclimated to the speed of the NFL. Shanny is a hack like Harbaugh at this point.

Plus I don't get the major malfunction of he hasn't played enough to determine anything. Has he played a whole season? No not at all. No QB in his class came in and balled out. It's not normal to have a Herbert or Purdy. It simply doesn't happen like that. These are rare cases.

Breh, I'm convinced you just don't like good coaches. Harbs and Shanny are easily the 2 best coaches we've had since Seifert

And for the record, I wanted Trey to start from Day 1. But knowing what we know now, starting Jimmy in 2021 ended up being the right call for the team. And I'm far from a Jimmy fan

 

[Bryan Danielson]

Breh, I'm convinced you just don't like good coaches. Harbs and Shanny are easily the 2 best coaches we've had since Seifert

And for the record, I wanted Trey to start from Day 1. But knowing what we know now, starting Jimmy in 2021 ended up being the right call for the team. And I'm far from a Jimmy fan

Don’t kid yourself

You was on the JimmyG plane with a few of us!!

Don’t revise history now

 

[yseJ]

Breh, I'm convinced you just don't like good coaches. Harbs and Shanny are easily the 2 best coaches we've had since Seifert

And for the record, I wanted Trey to start from Day 1. But knowing what we know now, starting Jimmy in 2021 ended up being the right call for the team. And I'm far from a Jimmy fan

I disagree, if Trey started from day one we'd have a much better idea of what he is now. We still don't know shyt about him and even considering both extreme scenarios this year (he's really good or he really bombs) you don't know what's gonna happen after - if he's really good how will the league adjust and if he bombs can he improve substantially.
Two year sample size is a lot more telling than one year sample size.


When you give up this much for a QB on a rookie contract, you need to maximize his value to the team.

 

[Dat916nigga]

I disagree, if Trey started from day one we'd have a much better idea of what he is now. We still don't know shyt about him and even considering both extreme scenarios this year (he's really good or he really bombs) you don't know what's gonna happen after - if he's really good how will the league adjust and if he bombs can he improve substantially.
Two year sample size is a lot more telling than one year sample size.


When you give up this much for a QB on a rookie contract, you need to maximize his value to the team.

Would we, tho?

In a very limited sample size, Trey's already had three significant injuries (broken finger, sprained knee, broken ankle). And in the three games he started and finished, the team’s only 1-2. I thought starting Jimmy in 2021 was better for the team because I doubt Trey would've led them to the playoffs that year even if he was healthy. And the team was really desperate for a playoff run since they only had 1 playoff year in the first 4 years of Kyle's tenure. Sticking with Jimmy was a big reason why they made 2 deep playoff runs in the last 2 years

Short term, it was the right call for the team imo. Long term, it’s a problem. And it's a real conundrum because Trey's short and long term development got thrown all the way off when he broke his ankle

 

[yseJ]

Would we, tho?

In a very limited sample size, Trey's already had three significant injuries (broken finger, sprained knee, broken ankle). And in the three games he started and finished, the team’s only 1-2. I thought starting Jimmy in 2021 was better for the team because I doubt Trey would've led them to the playoffs that year even if he was healthy. And the team was really desperate for a playoff run since they only had 1 playoff year in the first 4 years of Kyle's tenure. Sticking with Jimmy was a big reason why they made 2 deep playoff runs in the last 2 years

Short term, it was the right call for the team imo. Long term, it’s a problem. And it's a real conundrum because Trey's short and long term development got thrown all the way off when he broke his ankle

if we were looking at short-term success only, we shoulda did what the Rams did and got Stafford. When you spend so much on a project QB on a win-now team, and if you say long-term its a problem....isnt there an issue there ?

 

[Bryan Danielson]

This one of me @calh45 @Robbo @feelosofer @Ishlibidish23 and @1ncognegro fav Niner RBs

 

[Bryan Danielson]

 

[Robbo]

This one of me @calh45 @Robbo @feelosofer @Ishlibidish23 and @1ncognegro fav Niner RBs

Had his jersey

 

[jwonder]

This one of me @calh45 @Robbo @feelosofer @Ishlibidish23 and @1ncognegro fav Niner RBs

Still remember that 90+ yd TD run against the Jets to start and end OT.

So glad I lived to see the greatest part of the Niners. Would suck to be fan and not experience it. Harbaugh and Shanny fans missed out.

 

[jwonder]

If true, I see most of these FA gone from the Niners. After signing MAGA Bosa, won't be much left. They need to work their magic in the draft. Banks and Burford were solid pickups.

 

[calh45]

This one of me @calh45 @Robbo @feelosofer @Ishlibidish23 and @1ncognegro fav Niner RBs

That was one of my favorite 49er teams to cheer for too. Young TO. Garrison before his ankle broke. JJ Stokes. We still had Jerry.....and by that point I got over my hate of Steve for replacing Joe.

 

[FaTaL]

66.9 pass blocking? What’s Mcg’s?

 

[Bryan Danielson]

66.9 pass blocking? What’s Mcg’s?

Chill Pres…. A few brehs in here gonna get what they want in Trey Tebow taking the field….

So you know we gonna need a great run blocker

 

[FaTaL]

Chill Pres…. A few brehs in here gonna get what they want in Trey Tebow taking the field….

So you know we gonna need a great run blocker

Mcg is a really good run blocker

 

[Big Dick]

I disagree, if Trey started from day one we'd have a much better idea of what he is now. We still don't know shyt about him and even considering both extreme scenarios this year (he's really good or he really bombs) you don't know what's gonna happen after - if he's really good how will the league adjust and if he bombs can he improve substantially.
Two year sample size is a lot more telling than one year sample size.


When you give up this much for a QB on a rookie contract, you need to maximize his value to the team.

We were a dropped pick away from playing in the Super Bowl against a team we already beat once. Starting Jimmy was definitely the right move.

I agree with everything else though.