I don't know what "millions of dollars in training" means lol, but having one random operator get confused by an upgraded system in the heat of the moment doesn't hold weight over someone actually breaking down what the camera's own settings are saying on the screen. If you watch the videos he literally shows you how the on-screen camera data proves the object isn't moving the way the operator claims its moving. On the ship itself people had been claiming UFO sightings for days (
almost certainly enemy spy drones) and the operator was primed to be jumpy.
The entire military/government doesn't devote hardly any fukking energy to this shyt. I've worked in physics and interned for NASA and virtually no one there develops any energy to this shyt. The government's most recent UFO program wasn't even funded until a random Nevada billionaire gave Harry Reid a big donation that allowed him to create a program that would give contracts and kickbacks to the billionaire's own company.
EDITORIAL: Harry Reid and the Pentagon’s UFO budget
If this shyt is so obvious, if experts all agree like you claim, then why are the only people seriously promoting it To The Stars's employees and random low-level military techs?
Why is it that the government, military, and civilian science industries aren't doing jack shyt in effort to follow up on any of it?
In the video you post he assumes that part that is rotating is a solid target and not glare. He misses the entire point that if the light is glare on the optic system, then rotating the optic system will rotate the orientation of the glare. Either he didn't think much about what was actually causing the shape of the glare or he's just fukking around to promote UFOs.
This is hilarious, cause people who promote this shyt will trust the explanation of any random person or youtube video, they'll put a fukking cop or spook or rock singer on TV (like we see in these videos) and pretend they're experts on advanced technology, they'll ignore literally everything that people with actual backgrounds in the subject tell them, then when they find one guy to confirm the assumptions they already had, they slobber all over that one "friendly expert" and claim that now for the first time expertise actually matters.