So Is It Safe To Say That Females Like Dark Dudes Because Of Protection?

[fscballin]

this is close to original

this is not







my problem is when "black people" claim those two are of the same race which happens more frequently than you would like to admit


the people who make those kind of claims are against truth, and are not my friends

 

[fscballin]

They might be mixed with arabs but they are the precursor to arabs. Arabs aren't a race either btw.

that's not the argument, but to address that, those people are a result of a mixture with arabs meaning without that mixture those people as they appear to us today, would not exist

 

[Mr. Somebody]

this is close to original

this is not







my problem is when "black people" claim those two are of the same race which happens more frequently than you would like to admit


the people who make those kind of claims are against truth, and are not my friends

Well, someone like him would be both, black, and whatever else he is. Why is that hard to acknowledge. Africans are not this hard regarding race friend. I think the trauma of your research into the black diaspora has kind of closed some doors in your mind that should be a little more open, friend.

Ok friend may not be black like our homegirl in previous posts but if that friend shares your blood, your culture and your spirit, how can they not be your friend, friend?

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

this is close to original

this is not







my problem is when "black people" claim those two are of the same race which happens more frequently than you would like to admit


the people who make those kind of claims are against truth, and are not my friends

The idea of race is a modern construct that has no genetic basis. Ancient people divided themselves but not by race shyt is all a social construct to justify social inequality.

 

[fscballin]

Well, someone like him would be both, black, and whatever else he is. Why is that hard to acknowledge. Africans are not this hard regarding race friend. I think the trauma of your research into the black diaspora has kind of closed some doors in your mind that should be a little more open, friend.

Ok friend may not be black like our homegirl in previous posts but if that friend shares your blood, your culture and your spirit, how can they not be your friend, friend?

It is not hard to acknowledge him as mixed. I am only referring to his a black for the context of this convo. The problem is, if he had 2 "black" parents, you would not call him mixed and proceed to put him in the same category as

and whether or not it was your intention, your action would be extremely demonic

 

[Swagnificent]

an ally 1st and foremost is someone who stands up for the truth.

not all "black" people are of the same race

this should be common sense

You do know race is just made up right? There is no such thing as the black gene or white gene. In America, anyone with any noticeable or known African ancestry is considered black.....in other countries its different.

Stop acting like there is some scientific test to prove blackness. All this race shyt is stuff Europeans created like 500 years ago. If genotypes and phenotypes had any connection, then people who look like this

would share some similarities with Africans. But they don't. They live in some islands inbetween India and Malaysia and are most related to those people and not black folks/Africans. Same thing with the nikkas in Papau New Guinea who look no different than black folks in Africa yet are most genetically related to the Japanese.


Race is a HUMAN CREATION. Scientifically we are all the same race. The human race. This black/white shyt is just stuff we make up to act like there is some connection between our outside appearance and our genes and ancestry. Genetically a Berber in Algeria that looks like this

is more closely related to a Masai warrior in Kenya that looks like this

than any european or white person.


If genetics has proven anything, its that PHENOTYPE (the way we look on the outside which is the basis for our conception of race) has no connection to GENOTYPE (how closely we actually relate to one another).

 

[PicoRoscoe]

That mixed man sexy than a muthafukka

 

[fscballin]

The idea of race is a modern construct that has no genetic basis. Ancient people divided themselves but not by race shyt is all a social construct to justify social inequality.

Ancient people did not try to create a melting pot, therefore there was no need for them to address the issues that we are discussing today, and many ancient people had strict laws about procreating with "foreigners" period

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

You do know race is just made up right? There is no such thing as the black gene or white gene. In America, anyone with any noticeable or known African ancestry is considered black.....in other countries its different.

Stop acting like there is some scientific test to prove blackness. All this race shyt is stuff Europeans created like 500 years ago. If genotypes and phenotypes had any connection, then people who look like this

would share some similarities with Africans. But they don't. They live in some islands inbetween India and Malaysia and are most related to those people and not black folks/Africans. Same thing with the nikkas in Papau New Guinea who look no different than black folks in Africa yet are most genetically related to the Japanese.


Race is a HUMAN CREATION. Scientifically we are all the same race. The human race. This black/white shyt is just stuff we make up to act like there is some connection between our outside appearance and our genes and ancestry. Genetically a Berber in Algeria that looks like this

is more closely related to a Masai warrior in Kenya that looks like this

than any european or white person.


If genetics has proven anything, its that PHENOTYPE (the way we look on the outside which is the basis for our conception of race) has no connection to GENOTYPE (how closely we actually relate to one another).

Word 2 chinese dudes can be as genetically different from each other as a chinese guy and a Spainard. The two chinese dudes will only look similar because of the phenotype.

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

Ancient people did not try to create a melting pot, therefore there was no need for them to address the issues that we are discussing today, and many ancient people had strict laws about procreating with "foreigners" period

This would depend on which ancient people you are speaking of. You could be a foreigner just because you had a different language, religion, customs and etc... being foreign had nothing to do with race.. .since there was no race. Of course there wasn't going to be that much of a melting pot it was harder to travel. Usually the foreigner they were speaking of were genetically identical to them and lived not too far away. You're taking something white people created and running with it but that's not how the original man got down.

 

[cleanface coney]

You do know race is just made up right? There is no such thing as the black gene or white gene. In America, anyone with any noticeable or known African ancestry is considered black.....in other countries its different.

Stop acting like there is some scientific test to prove blackness. All this race shyt is stuff Europeans created like 500 years ago. If genotypes and phenotypes had any connection, then people who look like this

would share some similarities with Africans. But they don't. They live in some islands inbetween India and Malaysia and are most related to those people and not black folks/Africans. Same thing with the nikkas in Papau New Guinea who look no different than black folks in Africa yet are most genetically related to the Japanese.


Race is a HUMAN CREATION. Scientifically we are all the same race. The human race. This black/white shyt is just stuff we make up to act like there is some connection between our outside appearance and our genes and ancestry. Genetically a Berber in Algeria that looks like this

is more closely related to a Masai warrior in Kenya that looks like this

than any european or white person.


If genetics has proven anything, its that PHENOTYPE (the way we look on the outside which is the basis for our conception of race) has no connection to GENOTYPE (how closely we actually relate to one another).

this the shyt i been learning in my Anthropology class

my teacher(young black woman) said the EXACT same thing

thats crazy i log on and this one the first things i see

 

[fscballin]

You do know race is just made up right? There is no such thing as the black gene or white gene. In America, anyone with any noticeable or known African ancestry is considered black.....in other countries its different.

Stop acting like there is some scientific test to prove blackness. All this race shyt is stuff Europeans created like 500 years ago. If genotypes and phenotypes had any connection, then people who look like this

would share some similarities with Africans. But they don't. They live in some islands inbetween India and Malaysia and are most related to those people and not black folks/Africans. Same thing with the nikkas in Papau New Guinea who look no different than black folks in Africa yet are most genetically related to the Japanese.


Race is a HUMAN CREATION. Scientifically we are all the same race. The human race. This black/white shyt is just stuff we make up to act like there is some connection between our outside appearance and our genes and ancestry. Genetically a Berber in Algeria that looks like this

is more closely related to a Masai warrior in Kenya that looks like this

than any european or white person.


If genetics has proven anything, its that PHENOTYPE (the way we look on the outside which is the basis for our conception of race) has no connection to GENOTYPE (how closely we actually relate to one another).

the point you are trying to make is irrelevant. There are blacks who's phenotype are the closest in resemblance to the original "wooly haired dark skinned human being". They have had a different, and more oppressed experience on this planet. And as a result, in this racially categorized world, they deserve a separate racial classification, regardless of their "genotype."


And aren't you white anyway? What does this have to do with you?

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

I love all black people but it's sad to think that some might not like me back or have some preconceived notion of me because of my complexion. It's just odd and I feel like white people really really fukked us up in the head.

 

[fscballin]

This would depend on which ancient people you are speaking of. You could be a foreigner just because you had a different language, religion, customs and etc... being foreign had nothing to do with race.. .since there was no race. Of course there wasn't going to be that much of a melting pot it was harder to travel. Usually the foreigner they were speaking of were genetically identical to them and lived not too far away. You're taking something white people created and running with it but that's not how the original man got down.

When you say there was no concept of race, are you implying that there was no perception of the difference in the color of a people's skin, or other physical/phenotypical differences.

If so, then you would be wrong

The description of white people can be found in ancient writings such as the bible.

Miriam’s skin was leprous[a]—it became as white as snow. Aaron turned toward her and saw that she had a defiling skin disease

A priest must look at the infection. If the infection seems to be deeper than the skin, and if the hair around it is thin and yellow, the priest must announce that the person is unclean. It is a serious skin disease.

And the description of blacks, as viewed by nonblacks could be found in Flavius Josephus Against Apion Book 1, another ancient book

Cherilus also, a still ancienter writer, and a poet, makes mention of our nation, and informs us that it came to the assistance of king Xerxes, in his expedition against Greece. For in his enumeration of all those nations, he last of all inserts ours among the rest, when he says," At the last there passed over a people, wonderful to be beheld; for they spake the Phoenician tongue with their mouths; they dwelt in the Solymean mountains, near a broad lake: their heads were sooty; they had round rasures on them; their heads and faces were like nasty horse-heads also, that had been hardened in the smoke

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

When you say there was no concept of race, are you implying that there was no perception of the difference in the color of a people's skin, or other physical/phenotypical differences.

If so, then you would be wrong

The description of white people can be found in ancient writings such as the bible.




And the description of blacks, as viewed by nonblacks could be found in Flavius Josephus Against Apion Book 1, another ancient book

Anyone with two eyes can see skin color so that's not what I'm implying obviously. These things were not looked at as race but of the color of a different people's skin period. Just as if someone had different customs or religions. You could have a variance in the color skin of your own people so therefore it wasn't looked at as another race.

There's an ancient roman painting of Africans were the romans called the africans "dark skinned warriors". All they saw was a different skin color.. it doesn't have anything to do with race.

One of the things you posted was a description of leprosy breh...