Facts according to you and Vince. There are no "facts" in this fukkery. Just look at the NWA Title history, numerous champs from Flair to Douglas have held and left the NWA affiliation with the title. NWA subsequently crowned a new champ. I say that's bullshyt, just like Vince killing the WCW title is bullshyt. It's the same belt I grew up watching Flair carry. At the end of the day the shyt is fake, so that's the reality to me and I bet MOST fans.
We know what you mean and what you mean is right from a good faith standpoint.
In a world, where things were right.
Yet, Vince preys on that thinking and just uses the cosmetics of the title.
Which are actually amalgamted and different from the original title.
To just draw in nostalgic fans using the belt's immediate visual appearance.
The whc title is nuffin more than when kanyon pulled the platinum wcw title out of the briefcase.
It has no lineage, or history technically behind it.
Just like kanyon's title.
It only means sumfin as a draw built off of nostalgia and cosmetic.
Yet, legally and lineage wise it is completely made up.
Just like kanyon's platinum briefcase title was.
You should have no issue with ed.
As he was just telling you the exact factual truth.
you are also,...not completely wrong either.
The person who is wrong is Vince.
For not finding another cosmetic look for the title.
Then preying on the wcs fanbase.
After he buried the title and promotion to appease his ego.
Instead of creating a profitable business model.
That was built from success and not just trimming the roster.
Art Barr
fukk YOU for thinking the belts mean anything more than what the OWNER says.
but it turned out to be 