That was his first year as a starter. What u mean only had his breakout year last year
Fields is far from being a rookie. He has had 3 years of playing as a starter.
Im legit gonna get a hold of scientists to dissect this love fest people have for Fields.
Why even respond to posts if you didn't understand a single sentence in them? I'm not even a fan of Fields, he just objectively has not had enough experience to declare he's a bust yet.
You seem to be unaware that Fields only played 1.5 years as a starting QB in college cause of Covid, and because of injuries he basically has had 2.5 years as a starter in the NFL. That's only 4 years total despite being thrown into the mix immediately, he never got time to learn and develop under an experienced NFL quarterback.
Compare that to Bo Nix, who already has 5 years of starting QB reps under his belt and just as many career starts as Fields has. That's what I was saying when I said that Fields is like a rookie - he basically has the same amount of career experience as a 4-year college starter with a redshirt year.
Love, unlike Fields, had 3 years as a starter in college then 2 more years to develop under a star quarterback in the NFL, and is half a year older than Fields is now. What I was pointing out is that even though people are treating Love like a young player just getting started, he actually is older and in some ways better experienced than Fields is.
Why assume that a player who has only started 4 years of games in college/pros combined will already be up to peak game knowledge and doesn't have room to improve?