So Andrew Luck today did this...

[tremonthustler1]

Why yall always gotta hate on the white man? Andrew Luck is a gawd. You aint gotta hate on Luck to cheer for RG3

Forget it Jake. It's The Coli.

 

[FreedS[ohh]lave]

To say WIlson is better then Luck is assinine

You think Wilson in a offense like Lucks without a running game where he has to take chances and make big plays every game the Colts would be where they are?

WIlson has played well at home the past few weeks but dude for most of the year has ben used like Sanchez was for the Jets his rookie year..

Safe playcalling lean on the running game and great d and be sucessful in play action

 

[Tony D'Amato]

I hate his people being up stats. Arians offense relies on way too many deep throws. Griffin has thrown hundreds of Jul 5yrs and less passes. That offense doesn't require hum to throw a lot in tight windows and he has a better team. Just look at the records last yr. As good as Regime Wayne is, he doesn't get much separation and he's not out running anyone. Then Collie has been gone all yr. He didn't have any turnovers in the 2nd half and had a tdma dropped by Avery.

Luck deserves ROY cuz he doesn't run a gimmick offense and is carrying a team that won 2gms last season

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

Jake Locker lost that game more than Luck won.

How can Luck have such terrible stats, but his team still wins.
Maybe his team isn't that bad, maybe his team can play defense and create turns over.

Wins are a team stat not a players, people just use that shyt to make arguments because they listen to Skip Bayless too much

He doesn't

 

[MegaTronBomb!]

last year, the colts were 2-14... this year they are 9-4 and will most likely get into the playoffs....with no running game at all.

if you watch the games, and not just the boxscore...aint no way you can not give it to Luck.

 

[CrimsonTider]

A lot. A prime example is when Peyton Manning became a much better passer when the Colts acquired Edgerrinn James.

So you just ignore the fact Peyton made the SB in 2009 with the worse rushing game in the league?

 

[ECA]

So you just ignore the fact Peyton made the SB in 2009 with the worse rushing game in the league?

Was Peyton a rookie at that time?

 

[Savior]

It is possible to compliment both without shytting on the other. The fact remains though is that duke leads the league in INTs with top 5 worst completion percentage. Being a rookie is no excuse for turning over the ball. Wilson only has 9 and RGIII - 4. That shyt can work when you're beating up on the jaguars and titans every other week but if you get to the Playoffs and start playing real teams, that shyt will cost your team the game period unless you have a stout defense which the colts do not, to bail you out like Eli & his savior front 4 defense. Go ahead and throw 4 picks against the Patriots or Texans and see how far you get

Its true that the other 2 rookies have less ints. However they also depend a lot more on the running game and short throwing plays than Luck does. Not to take anything away from them but just watching the Colts game yesterday he was slinging it deep on basically every drive. They're not callin plays for him like a rookie but more like a 10 year vet. Obviously from the int number theres still some accuracy issues to work out and maybe they need to tone it down a bit but hes handling it pretty well for a 1st year player

 

[Lakerman0834]

alot actually...safeties and lb's tend to cheat up when a team has a good running game, it open things up dramatically in the passing game..and in Washington's case, when you have a RB and a QB that can run, it opens up the pass game even more...because IND has no true running threat, LB's and safeties are more reluctant to play coverage, which complicates the passing game dramatically....as IND develops a running game and Luck gains more experience, the passing game will become more simple for him...

why you gotta hit them rg3 stans with this knowledge

 

[Master Teacher]

He doesn't

shyt, if Locker would have throw made those dumb ass ints, the colts would have lost because Luck did not have a good game. He completed less than 50% of his passes, not to mention he leads the league in INTS.

His team makes up for a lot of his mistakes, but don't get any credit.

 

[CrimsonTider]

Was Peyton a rookie at that time?

What does that have to do with his argument?

Dude argued the game is harder for a QB when he doesn't have a running game

I listed teams that had running games worse than the colts and made it as far as you can.

Luck not having a running game is no excuse for his stats

 

[FreedS[ohh]lave]

What does that have to do with his argument?

Dude argued the game is harder for a QB when he doesn't have a running game

I listed teams that had running games worse than the colts and made it as far as you can.

Luck not having a running game is no excuse for his stats

hes a rookie you gonna compare him to what Peyton and Rodgers did in their primes

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

shyt, if Locker would have throw made those dumb ass ints, the colts would have lost because Luck did not have a good game. He completed less than 50% of his passes, not to mention he leads the league in INTS.

His team makes up for a lot of his mistakes, but don't get any credit.

Oh, so you're talking about this past game, not season

 

[Trip]

I think Luck is going to be awesome, but this Colts team isnt that good. Easy schedule and a bunch of fluky wins.

 

[CrimsonTider]

hes a rookie you gonna compare him to what Peyton and Rodgers did in their primes

I'm saying that you can not point at the colts running game for reason that Luck stats are not as good as Griffin or Wilson