Should AEW Bring In The Trios Titles Or A Secondary Tag Team Championship??

WHICH TAG TITLES SHOULD AEW ADD??


  • Total voters
    51

Marlo Barksdale

Really out chea
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,800
Reputation
1,398
Daps
15,884
Reppin
Tha M
They can't do a cruiserweight title because literally 90% of their roster would have to be in it. When Billy Gunn looks like a giant in your battle royales.....:patrice:

They could do a secondary tag title instead of all these thrown together 6 man tag matches.
 

Homeboy Runny-Ray

From Around The Way
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,724
Reputation
-954
Daps
20,087
Reppin
Classic Niccas
I disagree with the idea of adding titles to make the matches have meaning. If that’s the problem then the real issue is the creative isn’t good enough. Titles are just props and while it may help a little...it’s like putting a bandaid on a gash because eventually we won’t care about the title matches


the roster is over-crowded.

you can have the best booking in the world, and youre still gonna need more titles for this roster. especially the tag division.
 

Crack Daniels

Under New Management
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
8,280
Reputation
380
Daps
25,223
the roster is over-crowded.

you can have the best booking in the world, and youre still gonna need more titles for this roster. especially the tag division.

I agree with the overcrowded roster. But if that Young Bucks/ Jurassic Express match would’ve been for the TNT Tag Titles, how much more would we have cared about it :ld:
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,928
Reputation
13,092
Daps
92,180
Reppin
CHICAGO
no,....

I wish you nikkaz would write rants.
so we could definitively know you don't know wtf you talembout.


art barr
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,933
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
I disagree with the idea of adding titles to make the matches have meaning. If that’s the problem then the real issue is the creative isn’t good enough. Titles are just props and while it may help a little...it’s like putting a bandaid on a gash because eventually we won’t care about the title matches
See I disagree because titles in wrestling are good for segmentation of a roster.

There are some guys who will never be considered world title prospects but who are still good wrestlers, so if you create a division where those guys can actually be wrestling for a purpose it adds to the product and also gives creative a focus on what to do with certain people.
 

Paper Boi

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
74,233
Reputation
25,317
Daps
484,303
Reppin
NULL
if they do a six man title it needs to be taken very seriously.

it doesn't work for me as a secondary tag title like in NJPW.


i wouldn't be mad if they did a yearly trios tourney though. jack it since chikara is out of business now.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,933
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
Somebody used to have the United States or North American tag titles...maybe AWA or NwA.
It was NWA/WCW

tumblr_n27j3z6V001rg89a6o1_500.jpg

2938b2fda8ce2d50a61bd24980705207.jpg

56a0ed1cb45e81de61b3e36ea4827cf2.png
 

Toe Jay Simpson

Searchin’
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
24,831
Reputation
8,410
Daps
135,078
Reppin
Carmel City
In AEWs case more titles are a good thing. You have a roster most people are not familiar with so titles could serve to get people over.

AEW Dark for example should have a title defended there regularly
 

luckyse7enz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
41,752
Reputation
7,380
Daps
121,203
Reppin
Detroit/Los Angeles
Absolutely not.

Make it a Trios Cup and create an annual tournament around it that ends at a PPV.

That way, you can have any and all trios storylines build for months leading into the tournament and create a March Madness energy for that period and then quickly dissolve teams into individual storylines that were built during the tournament.

No need for defenses, just a whole lotta gang shyt.
 

Max.

Banned
WOAT
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Messages
33,993
Reputation
3,196
Daps
102,358
In AEWs case more titles are a good thing. You have a roster most people are not familiar with so titles could serve to get people over.

AEW Dark for example should have a title defended there regularly


1) literally all the champs are ex wwe guys rn
2) not one star has been made by this company way over a year
3) aew dark isnt good...its a job matches
 

Crack Daniels

Under New Management
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
8,280
Reputation
380
Daps
25,223
See I disagree because titles in wrestling are good for segmentation of a roster.

There are some guys who will never be considered world title prospects but who are still good wrestlers, so if you create a division where those guys can actually be wrestling for a purpose it adds to the product and also gives creative a focus on what to do with certain people.

Right, I’m not against the Heavyweight-Midcard-Tag team title structure. I think it’s the perfect way to do it. My comment was more of a general statement about creating titles for the sake of and how I feel they’ve become a crutch for lazy booking the past few years
 
Top