Shawty Lo has 11 kids by 10 different women

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,638
Daps
119,431
only certain women treat it as such. you have all the reproductive rights. you know if a man wants to fukk you for fun or for a kid. yet y'all treat it as a means to trap men.

So you can't fukk for fun AND use a condom? Or if you insist on having unprotected sex, you can't fukk with a chick on birth control?

I'm all for men not wanting children with some of the women they sleep with but at the same time, why participate in activities that can cause you to have children? It's dumb to lose that control over sex.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,825
Daps
157,157
So you can't fukk for fun AND use a condom? Or if you insist on having unprotected sex, you can't fukk with a chick on birth control?

I'm all for men not wanting children with some of the women they sleep with but at the same time, why participate in activities that can cause you to have children? It's dumb to lose that control over sex.

i don't have any children, and i used protection up until i found a gf that's on a birth control shot. but at any time, she could stop getting the shot w/o telling me, and i end up with a kid i didn't ask for.

women refuse to hold themselves accountable, just spew the same tired lines. unless y'all were raped, i ain't trying to hear that shyt.

let me ask you this, would you support legislation that gave men the right to sign off all financial responsibilities? i mean, if y'all don't want a kid. you can get an abortion or 72 hr pill. if we don't want a kid, "tough luck, shouldn't have fukked her raw"
 

Ashley Banks

All I ever wanted was the world
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,007
Reputation
9,716
Daps
117,520
p*ssy is Russian Roulette if you treat it as such. Both parties are well aware of how babies are made so when they participate in sex without any type of birth control, they already know the risks they are running.

this. If you have sex with someone there's a chance you can get them pregnant (even if you use birth control). If you don't want to get certain women pregnant, don't have sex with them. Is that too hard to do?

You know what could happen every time you have sex but you don't care. Deal with the consequences.
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,638
Daps
119,431
i don't have any children, and i used protection up until i found a gf that's on a birth control shot. but at any time, she could stop getting the shot w/o telling me, and i end up with a kid i didn't ask for.

women refuse to hold themselves accountable, just spew the same tired lines. unless y'all were raped, i ain't trying to hear that shyt.

let me ask you this, would you support legislation that gave men the right to sign off all financial responsibilities? i mean, if y'all don't want a kid. you can get an abortion or 72 hr pill. if we don't want a kid, "tough luck, shouldn't have fukked her raw"

Accountability for the woman lies within the child she has to raise with or without the father in the picture. However anyone one feels about it, once the baby is past abortion term/here, men have the option to be parents whereas a mother typically does not.

That's why it's best for BOTH parties to understand the consequences of their actions. Even if your girl stops taking birth control, it's still up to you as a guy that doesn't want children, to do what's in your control NOT to have a baby. IF that means having protected sex every time, then so be it. If that means trusting your girl is on BC and having sex without a condom, then so be it. But don't act like you don't have any control over the situation.

No, I wouldn't support such a legislation because people shouldn't have the right to opt out poor decision making.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,825
Daps
157,157


this. If you have sex with someone there's a chance you can get them pregnant (that's what sex is for :rolleyes:). If you don't want to get certain women pregnant, don't have sex with them. Is that too hard to do?

You know what could happen every time you have sex but you don't care. Deal with the consequences.

i'll ask you the same question. would you support men being able to opt out the financial responsibility? you can have the kid you wanted, but the guy can go on about his marry way.
 

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
83,874
Reputation
15,054
Daps
333,995


this. If you have sex with someone there's a chance you can get them pregnant (even if you use birth control). If you don't want to get certain women pregnant, don't have sex with them. Is that too hard to do?

You know what could happen every time you have sex but you don't care. Deal with the consequences.
Actually it is. :manny:
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,825
Daps
157,157
Accountability for the woman lies within the child she has to raise with or without the father in the picture. However anyone one feels about it, once the baby is past abortion term/here, men have the option to be parents whereas a mother typically does not.

i agree, the woman is the one stuck with the parenting if the guy doesn't want to be there. except the woman can use birth control, make the guy wear a condom, use the 72 hr pill. have abortions up to 4 months into her pregnancy, or put the baby up for adoption. all of the options are in your court.

That's why it's best for BOTH parties to understand the consequences of their actions. Even if your girl stops taking birth control, it's still up to you as a guy that doesn't want children, to do what's in your control NOT to have a baby. IF that means having protected sex every time, then so be it. If that means trusting your girl is on BC and having sex without a condom, then so be it. But don't act like you don't have any control over the situation.

your whole argument is basically 'don't trust women/p*ssy' :why:


No, I wouldn't support such a legislation because people shouldn't have the right to opt out poor decision making.

of course you wouldn't support it, women would have very little reason to trap men with kids if they could skip off into the sunset
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,825
Daps
157,157
certain women treat their p*ssy like it's a venus fly trap. man, i'll be glad when male birth control hits the streets. you bytches are gonna be in for a rude awakening
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,638
Daps
119,431
i agree, the woman is the one stuck with the parenting if the guy doesn't want to be there. except the woman can use birth control, make the guy wear a condom, use the 72 hr pill. have abortions up to 4 months into her pregnancy, or put the baby up for adoption. all of the options are in your court.



your whole argument is based off "don't trust women/p*ssy" :why:




of course you wouldn't support it, women would have very little reason to trap men with kids if they could skip off into the sunset

And I'm not saying don't trust p*ssy. I never said that. I'm saying that when you have sex...unprotected there is a possibility that the woman can get pregnant. If you're unsure if she's on birth control or you don't use a condom, then your chances of her getting pregnant increase. Soooo do what you have to do to decrease your chances.

How do you trap someone that willingly puts themselves in a situation they don't want to be in?
 

Ashley Banks

All I ever wanted was the world
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,007
Reputation
9,716
Daps
117,520
i'll ask you the same question. would you support men being able to opt out the financial responsibility? you can have the kid you wanted, but the guy can go on about his marry way.

No, I wouldn't support it. If you can't see yourself having a child with someone, don't have sex with them.

Actually it is. :manny:

:dwillhuh: Really? It's hard to not have sex with someone you couldn't see being the mother of your children? I swear people have zero self control. :dry:
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,825
Daps
157,157
man, with this logic. it's really no wonder there's so many single mothers out there.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,825
Daps
157,157


No, I wouldn't support it. If you can't see yourself having a child with someone, don't have sex with them.

it's funny, you never hear women say "if you can't see him being a father to your children, don't sleep with him"

which is much more applicable. funny how y'all still want men to be held financially accountable for children he didn't want.
 

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
83,874
Reputation
15,054
Daps
333,995
I'll say this to the women. You will be the one who carries that baby for 9 months and have that special bond. All the nikka does is fukk and skeet. He doesn't get the back pains, morning sickness, cravings, doctors visits, time off work etc. So if you fukking nikkas and don't wanna get pregnant then please get on birth control because the sexual urges of a lot of people overtake their judgement. nikkas ain't thinking "Damn I wanna knock this chick up when they hit raw" They just thinking how good it's gonna feel to get in that monkey and bust one off. All logic slips the mind and the second head takes over.
 
Top