nikkadom.
only certain women treat it as such. you have all the reproductive rights. you know if a man wants to fukk you for fun or for a kid. yet y'all treat it as a means to trap men.
Yall saying they all busted, but yall know damn well yall would smash e'crecia
So you can't fukk for fun AND use a condom? Or if you insist on having unprotected sex, you can't fukk with a chick on birth control?
I'm all for men not wanting children with some of the women they sleep with but at the same time, why participate in activities that can cause you to have children? It's dumb to lose that control over sex.
p*ssy is Russian Roulette if you treat it as such. Both parties are well aware of how babies are made so when they participate in sex without any type of birth control, they already know the risks they are running.
i don't have any children, and i used protection up until i found a gf that's on a birth control shot. but at any time, she could stop getting the shot w/o telling me, and i end up with a kid i didn't ask for.
women refuse to hold themselves accountable, just spew the same tired lines. unless y'all were raped, i ain't trying to hear that shyt.
let me ask you this, would you support legislation that gave men the right to sign off all financial responsibilities? i mean, if y'all don't want a kid. you can get an abortion or 72 hr pill. if we don't want a kid, "tough luck, shouldn't have fukked her raw"
this. If you have sex with someone there's a chance you can get them pregnant (that's what sex is for ). If you don't want to get certain women pregnant, don't have sex with them. Is that too hard to do?
You know what could happen every time you have sex but you don't care. Deal with the consequences.
Actually it is.
this. If you have sex with someone there's a chance you can get them pregnant (even if you use birth control). If you don't want to get certain women pregnant, don't have sex with them. Is that too hard to do?
You know what could happen every time you have sex but you don't care. Deal with the consequences.
Accountability for the woman lies within the child she has to raise with or without the father in the picture. However anyone one feels about it, once the baby is past abortion term/here, men have the option to be parents whereas a mother typically does not.
That's why it's best for BOTH parties to understand the consequences of their actions. Even if your girl stops taking birth control, it's still up to you as a guy that doesn't want children, to do what's in your control NOT to have a baby. IF that means having protected sex every time, then so be it. If that means trusting your girl is on BC and having sex without a condom, then so be it. But don't act like you don't have any control over the situation.
No, I wouldn't support such a legislation because people shouldn't have the right to opt out poor decision making.
i agree, the woman is the one stuck with the parenting if the guy doesn't want to be there. except the woman can use birth control, make the guy wear a condom, use the 72 hr pill. have abortions up to 4 months into her pregnancy, or put the baby up for adoption. all of the options are in your court.
your whole argument is based off "don't trust women/p*ssy"
of course you wouldn't support it, women would have very little reason to trap men with kids if they could skip off into the sunset
i'll ask you the same question. would you support men being able to opt out the financial responsibility? you can have the kid you wanted, but the guy can go on about his marry way.
Actually it is.
No, I wouldn't support it. If you can't see yourself having a child with someone, don't have sex with them.