But they didn’t make any of those claims.Look man, I got no dog in this fight as I'm a PC gamer currently playing "Baldur's Gate 3"....
Having said that, your post is the reason why developers feel comfortable half assing shyt, and exactly why several devs were copping pleas before "BG3" even came out.
You're talking about people should know better than to listen to promises made by the people that make the game.
Man....what?
As a consumer it's not my job to have realistic expectations based on things you promised. If a developer tells me there's gonna be 5,000 real worlds, all fully rendered and populated....I'm gonna expect that.
And I don't give a fukk if it's unrealistic or flat out impossible. If that's the case sell your game without lying to people.
Fred.
They even said LOTS of area on the planets would be fairly baren.
Todd Howard Says Only 10% of Starfield Planets Have Life on Them - IGN
Bethesda's Todd Howard has revealed that only 10% of Starfield's 1,000 planets will have life on them.
www.ign.com
This is just people making up shyt to pretend to be “disappointed”
Obviously it's procedural, so there's no way we're going to go and handcraft an entire planet," Howard continued. "What we do is we handcraft individual locations and some of those are placed specifically, [like] the main cities and other quest locations, and then we have a suite of them that are generated or placed when you land depending on that planet."
He literally detailed exactly how the game works.