Show me anything of that sort? Giving accurate details to a b*stardized story is not nut hugging. Do you understand what standard business is. Nobody made any excuses. You dudes struggle with comprehension. In case you don't get it. That was the business. He didn't invent or reinvent contracts. Maybe remixes according to him but not standard music industry contracts.Why are you hugging his nuts so desperately? Yes most people who ran a Label raped their artists, that is common knowledge. The fact that others did it too is not an excuse![]()
Before the digital era and tech advancing music making and distribution. Running a label required up front investments and new artists had no leverage to get anymore than they got because they had to show and prove. Acting like children and refusing to understand business and how it works does not benefit you. If the business was inherently unfair or predatory then don't participate.
Fact remains i you told you upfront that he had reverted the rights to his artists ahead of schedule and furthermore refused to sell them. He didn't have to do any of that. He didn't have to give mase his shyt back or the lox either. Yet despite all that fact checking you went the retard route talking about nut hugging. It's embarrassing. Dude is going beyond what he has to do and you the one who's on his dikk still talking the same old retarded misinformed shyt. Alternatively they could have not got signed at all. Nobody was going to give them better deals. That's why west coast/southern artists went the route they did with independence. Know the game or keep bytching for an eternity.
Jay had leverage when he signed to def jam and still had to buy his contract out at the end for 5 million. Had leverage with his first album self distributed and still had to break off dame and Biggs. A billionaire and doesn't have his full masters back. Being idealistic not caring to learn about the topic you discuss but you still want to have opinions. Sounds like hoe bable to me
Last edited: