SCOTUS Watch Thread

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,772
Reputation
9,068
Daps
167,732


1/11
@davenewworld_2
They're censoring us to control the narrative



https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1878554670139858944/vid/avc1/576x1024/XI_4HWFHAldCbVEK.mp4

2/11
@davenewworld_2
πŸŽ₯ tiktok: goodtrouble_
TikTok - Make Your Day



GhH3k8nWcAA0mqK.jpg


3/11
@daendodi
@ezdubs_bot English to Spanish



4/11
@ezdubs_bot
@daendodi πŸ—£οΈπŸŽ‰ Done! Here is your Spanish dub (πŸ”— link to dub in reply! )

πŸ“±π˜Ώπ™€π™¬π™£π™‘π™€π™–π™™ π™€π™―π˜Ώπ™ͺ𝙗𝙨 π™ˆπ™šπ™¨π™¨π™šπ™£π™œπ™šπ™§ 𝙛𝙀𝙧 π™žπ™Šπ™Ž 𝙖𝙣𝙙 π˜Όπ™£π™™π™§π™€π™žπ™™ 𝙩𝙀 πŸ“žβœ¨ π™©π™§π™–π™£π™¨π™‘π™–π™©π™š π™₯π™π™€π™£π™š π™˜π™–π™‘π™‘π™¨ π™žπ™£ π™§π™šπ™–π™‘-π™©π™žπ™’π™š 𝙖𝙣𝙙 πŸ’¬πŸŒŽ π™˜π™π™–π™© π™žπ™£ π™™π™žπ™›π™›π™šπ™§π™šπ™£π™© π™‘π™–π™£π™œπ™ͺπ™–π™œπ™šπ™¨!



https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1878849918321799168/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/9NbzreUQ_UMW7vYQ.mp4

5/11
@urinalwallpoet
Lots of entities had issues with tik tok. But it was never taken as serious until the pro Palestinian content increased substantially



6/11
@Come_Oon_Man
They want:

CONTROL
MONEY
NARRATIVE



7/11
@LauraMiers
NAILED IT.

β€œIt is about making sure that we don’t get to control the information that we share with each other and only the U.S. government is allowed to do that. That is why they’re doing this.”



8/11
@clevebarb
The American app is sinister in comparison to the CCP approved, education heavy version of TikTok.



9/11
@CantStopPoppin
Sure thing! Here's your text formatted for Twitter with double spaces between each paragraph:

The Courts are Always at Least 15 Years Behind: It's Not Just an Anomaly, It's by Design.

Digital Privacy and Surveillance -
Law: Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986 - This act governs the interception of wire, oral, and electronic communications but does not account for many modern technologies.
Ruling: Carpenter v. United States (2018) - The Supreme Court ruled that accessing historical cell phone location records without a warrant is a Fourth Amendment violation, highlighting the outdated nature of ECPA in the context of modern technology.

Cybersecurity and Data Breaches -
Law: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) of 1986 - Aimed at combating hacking, but its broad language leads to interpretations that don't fit contemporary cyber issues.
Ruling: United States v. Nosal (2012) - The Ninth Circuit held that accessing a computer system in violation of a company's use policy does not constitute "unauthorized access" under the CFAA, showing the law's limitations in addressing modern data access scenarios.

Intellectual Property in the Digital Realm -
Law: Copyright Act of 1976 with amendments like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998 - These laws struggle with the digital distribution of content.
Ruling: MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005) - The Supreme Court ruled on the liability of peer-to-peer file-sharing software distributors, but the case highlighted the difficulties in applying copyright law to new technology platforms.

Internet Regulation and Freedom of Speech -
Law: Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996, Section 230 - Provides immunity to online service providers for content posted by users.
Ruling: Reno v. ACLU (1997) - The Court struck down parts of the CDA that criminalized "indecent" and "patently offensive" communications, illustrating early attempts to regulate internet content, but the broader protection under Section 230 has been debated in numerous contexts since, including cases like Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc. (2016), where courts have had to interpret how far this immunity extends in the face of evolving online harms.

Technology in Law Enforcement -
Law: No specific overarching law, but general principles like the Fourth Amendment are applied.
Ruling: Jones v. United States (2012) - The Supreme Court ruled that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle to monitor its movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, highlighting the need for legal frameworks to keep up with surveillance technology.
Ruling: Riley v. California (2014) - The Court ruled that police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested, showing how traditional legal principles are being applied to new technologies.



10/11
@short_straw
The judiciary just makes shyt up to get to the ending they always washed to be at. Happens all the time.



11/11
@urinalwallpoet




GhKg2TbXAAALiy-.jpg



To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,762
Reputation
3,753
Daps
159,999
Reppin
Brooklyn


1/11
@davenewworld_2
They're censoring us to control the narrative



https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1878554670139858944/vid/avc1/576x1024/XI_4HWFHAldCbVEK.mp4

2/11
@davenewworld_2
πŸŽ₯ tiktok: goodtrouble_
TikTok - Make Your Day



GhH3k8nWcAA0mqK.jpg


3/11
@daendodi
@ezdubs_bot English to Spanish



4/11
@ezdubs_bot
@daendodi πŸ—£οΈπŸŽ‰ Done! Here is your Spanish dub (πŸ”— link to dub in reply! )

πŸ“±π˜Ώπ™€π™¬π™£π™‘π™€π™–π™™ π™€π™―π˜Ώπ™ͺ𝙗𝙨 π™ˆπ™šπ™¨π™¨π™šπ™£π™œπ™šπ™§ 𝙛𝙀𝙧 π™žπ™Šπ™Ž 𝙖𝙣𝙙 π˜Όπ™£π™™π™§π™€π™žπ™™ 𝙩𝙀 πŸ“žβœ¨ π™©π™§π™–π™£π™¨π™‘π™–π™©π™š π™₯π™π™€π™£π™š π™˜π™–π™‘π™‘π™¨ π™žπ™£ π™§π™šπ™–π™‘-π™©π™žπ™’π™š 𝙖𝙣𝙙 πŸ’¬πŸŒŽ π™˜π™π™–π™© π™žπ™£ π™™π™žπ™›π™›π™šπ™§π™šπ™£π™© π™‘π™–π™£π™œπ™ͺπ™–π™œπ™šπ™¨!



https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1878849918321799168/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/9NbzreUQ_UMW7vYQ.mp4

5/11
@urinalwallpoet
Lots of entities had issues with tik tok. But it was never taken as serious until the pro Palestinian content increased substantially



6/11
@Come_Oon_Man
They want:

CONTROL
MONEY
NARRATIVE



7/11
@LauraMiers
NAILED IT.

β€œIt is about making sure that we don’t get to control the information that we share with each other and only the U.S. government is allowed to do that. That is why they’re doing this.”



8/11
@clevebarb
The American app is sinister in comparison to the CCP approved, education heavy version of TikTok.



9/11
@CantStopPoppin
Sure thing! Here's your text formatted for Twitter with double spaces between each paragraph:

The Courts are Always at Least 15 Years Behind: It's Not Just an Anomaly, It's by Design.

Digital Privacy and Surveillance -
Law: Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986 - This act governs the interception of wire, oral, and electronic communications but does not account for many modern technologies.
Ruling: Carpenter v. United States (2018) - The Supreme Court ruled that accessing historical cell phone location records without a warrant is a Fourth Amendment violation, highlighting the outdated nature of ECPA in the context of modern technology.

Cybersecurity and Data Breaches -
Law: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) of 1986 - Aimed at combating hacking, but its broad language leads to interpretations that don't fit contemporary cyber issues.
Ruling: United States v. Nosal (2012) - The Ninth Circuit held that accessing a computer system in violation of a company's use policy does not constitute "unauthorized access" under the CFAA, showing the law's limitations in addressing modern data access scenarios.

Intellectual Property in the Digital Realm -
Law: Copyright Act of 1976 with amendments like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998 - These laws struggle with the digital distribution of content.
Ruling: MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005) - The Supreme Court ruled on the liability of peer-to-peer file-sharing software distributors, but the case highlighted the difficulties in applying copyright law to new technology platforms.

Internet Regulation and Freedom of Speech -
Law: Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996, Section 230 - Provides immunity to online service providers for content posted by users.
Ruling: Reno v. ACLU (1997) - The Court struck down parts of the CDA that criminalized "indecent" and "patently offensive" communications, illustrating early attempts to regulate internet content, but the broader protection under Section 230 has been debated in numerous contexts since, including cases like Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc. (2016), where courts have had to interpret how far this immunity extends in the face of evolving online harms.

Technology in Law Enforcement -
Law: No specific overarching law, but general principles like the Fourth Amendment are applied.
Ruling: Jones v. United States (2012) - The Supreme Court ruled that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle to monitor its movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, highlighting the need for legal frameworks to keep up with surveillance technology.
Ruling: Riley v. California (2014) - The Court ruled that police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested, showing how traditional legal principles are being applied to new technologies.



10/11
@short_straw
The judiciary just makes shyt up to get to the ending they always washed to be at. Happens all the time.



11/11
@urinalwallpoet




GhKg2TbXAAALiy-.jpg



To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196



The company has repeatedly been caught lying to congress and the public.

American companies aren't even allowed to operate freely there and that should be reciprocated frankly.

The Chinese government is an absolute abomination that other than screwing over their own citizens, is militaristic and expansionist to its neighbors, and is currently committing numerous genocides and ethnic cleansing campaigns.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,772
Reputation
9,068
Daps
167,732
The company has repeatedly been caught lying to congress and the public.

American companies aren't even allowed to operate freely there and that should be reciprocated frankly.

The Chinese government is an absolute abomination that other than screwing over their own citizens, is militaristic and expansionist to its neighbors, and is currently committing numerous genocides and ethnic cleansing campaigns.

every single american social media company has been caught lying to congress and the public.

if american companies cna't operate there freely, then the u.s should end trading with them but we don't because of greed. can't hate them for exploiting the greed of U.S businesses. america is the one who advocates free-market capitalism, not them. not sure why you'd expect them to let companies operate freely when they execute corrupt CEO's and executives like in the fake baby formula scandal etc.

theres actual consequences for currupt and illegal business practices.



the U.S closest ally is committing a genocide and we've supported authoritarian governments for decades like the one in saudi arabia.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,762
Reputation
3,753
Daps
159,999
Reppin
Brooklyn
every single american social media company has been caught lying to congress and the public.

if american companies cna't operate there freely, then the u.s should end trading with them but we don't because of greed. can't hate them for exploiting the greed of U.S businesses. america is the one who advocates free-market capitalism, not them. not sure why you'd expect them to let companies operate freely when they execute corrupt CEO's and executives like in the fake baby formula scandal etc.

theres actual consequences for currupt and illegal business practices.



the U.S closest ally is committing a genocide and we've supported authoritarian governments for decades like the one in saudi arabia.

bunch of whataboutism

just say you don't care about corporate responsibiltiy

what a terrible hill to die on


lmao china doesn't care about the rule of law lmfao
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,772
Reputation
9,068
Daps
167,732
bunch of whataboutism

just say you don't care about corporate responsibiltiy

what a terrible hill to die on


lmao china doesn't care about the rule of law lmfao

they don't care about their laws or they don't care about american laws?
 
Top