Spidey Man
Superstar
How?
25th amendment. Could have used it to remove Trump from office
SCOTUS Watch Thread
- Thread starter Hood Critic
- Start date
25th amendment. Could have used it to remove Trump from office
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
How Clarence Thomas has provided a list of legal targets to ultra-right groups — Guardian US
The US supreme court justice has set out course of action by signaling ‘in an appropriate case’ in concurring opinions
apple.news
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
It’s Official: The Supreme Court Ignores Its Own Precedent
The Roberts Court has violated its own logic with the ruling on executive immunity. Donald Trump is the beneficiary.
www.theatlantic.com
Mhmm
It’s Official: The Supreme Court Ignores Its Own Precedent
The Roberts Court has violated its own logic with the ruling on executive immunity. Donald Trump is the beneficiary.
Mhmm
This ruling will ultimately prove unworkable imo.
Biden still fighting for us 
Top 2 of all time and he ain’t number 2
www.theguardian.com
Top 2 of all time and he ain’t number 2
Biden calls for supreme court reforms including 18-year justice term limits
President also says presidential immunity for crimes should be removed and ethics rules for justices should be stricter
www.theguardian.com
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Supreme Court Blocks, for Now, Another Biden Student Debt Plan
The move followed a decision last year that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by trying to forgive more than $400 billion in student loans.
1/1
Wow, I might be over-reading this decision but it looks like the Third Circuit just gutted Section 230.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
Wow, I might be over-reading this decision but it looks like the Third Circuit just gutted Section 230.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
1/9
CA3 says Sec 230 doesn’t protect TikTok and ByteDance for creating an algorithm that fed the “Blackout challenge” to a 10yo who then tried it and accidentally hanged herself.
https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/223061p.pdf
Panel (Obama, Trump, Trump) relies on SCOTUS opinions from Moody v NetChoice.
2/9
The panel says Moody changes the whole ballgame re algorithms and 230:
3/9
One of the Trump appointees writes separately to build on Justice Thomas’s view that courts’ expansive application of 230 is far afield from its purpose and the context in which it was enacted:
4/9
Judge Matey goes on to more fully explicate what he sees as 230’s publisher/distributor distinction re liability, which the majority opinion declined to address:
5/9
Matey departs from the panel majority because the majority believes Moody changed how courts should analyze 230 re algorithms, while Matey—like Thomas—believes 230 never protected platforms for distributing content they know opens them up to legal liability:
6/9
Which is why Matey distinguishes the controlling CA3 precedent rather than say, like the majority, that SCOTUS abrogated it:
7/9
As should be obvious by the time you read to this point, but my initial tweet wrongly suggested Matey also joined the panel majority’s Moody analysis. He did not, but he did side with them on the bottom-line that TikTok and ByteDance don’t have 230 immunity for claim at issue.
8/9
The irony: the same reasoning that affirmed the platforms' 1A protection abrogated their 230 protection
9/9
But see
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
CA3 says Sec 230 doesn’t protect TikTok and ByteDance for creating an algorithm that fed the “Blackout challenge” to a 10yo who then tried it and accidentally hanged herself.
https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/223061p.pdf
Panel (Obama, Trump, Trump) relies on SCOTUS opinions from Moody v NetChoice.
2/9
The panel says Moody changes the whole ballgame re algorithms and 230:
3/9
One of the Trump appointees writes separately to build on Justice Thomas’s view that courts’ expansive application of 230 is far afield from its purpose and the context in which it was enacted:
4/9
Judge Matey goes on to more fully explicate what he sees as 230’s publisher/distributor distinction re liability, which the majority opinion declined to address:
5/9
Matey departs from the panel majority because the majority believes Moody changed how courts should analyze 230 re algorithms, while Matey—like Thomas—believes 230 never protected platforms for distributing content they know opens them up to legal liability:
6/9
Which is why Matey distinguishes the controlling CA3 precedent rather than say, like the majority, that SCOTUS abrogated it:
7/9
As should be obvious by the time you read to this point, but my initial tweet wrongly suggested Matey also joined the panel majority’s Moody analysis. He did not, but he did side with them on the bottom-line that TikTok and ByteDance don’t have 230 immunity for claim at issue.
8/9
The irony: the same reasoning that affirmed the platforms' 1A protection abrogated their 230 protection
9/9
But see
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
Alaska man charged with threatening to assassinate 6 Supreme Court justices
The Alaska man allegedly sent more than 465 messages to the Supreme Court through an online portal.
www.cbsnews.com
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
How Roberts Shaped Trump’s Supreme Court Winning Streak
Behind the scenes, the chief justice molded three momentous Jan. 6 and election cases that helped determine the former president’s fate.