Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
DO YOU RECOGNIZE THE CONTRADICTION HERE, BROTHER? "TWO SECONDS, VOILA!" MAKES SENSE, DUDE! "A BILLION YEARS, VOILA!" IS THE SILLIEST THING I'VE READ TODAY, MEAN GENE!a billion years voila!
DO YOU RECOGNIZE THE CONTRADICTION HERE, BROTHER? "TWO SECONDS, VOILA!" MAKES SENSE, DUDE! "A BILLION YEARS, VOILA!" IS THE SILLIEST THING I'VE READ TODAY, MEAN GENE!a billion years voila!
I see where you're coming from however I think that's more of an argument that a theist would use. Someone had to be there to throw that ball. If you on the other hand, say that a ball one day just showed up on a blade of grass on its own and nothing outside of the ball or the grass exists...that's how I see evolution.
Yeah but there'll be a lot less of them. Then less. Until they're irrelevant.I like how all religious people believe in everything in science without a moment of hesitation EXCEPT for the things that conflict directly with their religion.
When they use their cell phones for example, they won't dare question the Circuit Theory that serves as the basis for the electronic devices. They won't dare question the Theory of Gravity that explains the exact precise movement, orbit and location of the communication satellites that allow them to send data through that phone. They wont dare question Einstein's Special and Relativity theories that take into account time disparity that allows GPS and other satellites to work properly.
All theories but those theories are fine.
But theory of Evolution? That's just a theory you see? One that also happens to conflict with their book for now. In 100 years, they will be twisting their scripture to tell us that their holy book predicted evolution!
DO YOU RECOGNIZE THE CONTRADICTION HERE, BROTHER? "TWO SECONDS, VOILA!" MAKES SENSE, DUDE! "A BILLION YEARS, VOILA!" IS THE SILLIEST THING I'VE READ TODAY, MEAN GENE!
The golf ball analogy deals with your issue with probability. You're saying it's a one a gazillion chance of life developing, well one in a gazillion is still a chance. No matter how unlikely. By talking about who swung the golf ball you're taking it off in a tangent without worrying about your original problem.
MicroevolutionMacroevolution has never been observed - EvoWikiMacroevolutionMicroevolution
One has been observed, tested and reproduced. The other has not.
One is science, the other is faith.
Hollywood Hogan said:Macroevolution has never been observed - EvoWiki
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Part 5
YOUR ASININE RETORT ABOUT SEMANTICS IS SUCH AN INEVITABILITY TO ME THAT I'M BETTING ALL MY COLI CASH ON IT, BROTHER!

Macroevolutionary studies focus on change that occurs at or above the level of species, in contrast with microevolution, which refers to smaller evolutionary changes (typically described as changes in allele frequencies) within a species or population.
Macroevolution is at least evolution at or above the level of speciation, but it remains an open debate among scientists whether or not it is solely the end product of microevolutionary processes or there is some other set of processes that causes higher level trends and patterns.

link?Fixed