Saitama Inu (SAITAMA) Discussion Thread

[Uchiha God]

Unethical in corporate world could be legal issues. Its why corporate jobs have entire HR departments. Thats not just for sexual harassment. Its for shyt like this. Its also why when you work at real corporate jobs you sign many documents and do weeks/months of boring ass training. Its majority on ethics that could get the company in trouble.

we are all posters on an internet board. reading comprehension shouldn't be this poor from any of us. The post you quoted literally contains the sentence "something being unethical or assumed to be such doesn’t inherently translate into not being legal." For clarification, I work in HR right now. My resume is literally Marketing and HR. I've studied contract law for a reason.

I get that we have our money on this and it’s human nature to want to justify things and look at CMC as this big pantomime villain, but there’s no lawsuit here. Only point of contention is they asserted Willie D is/was a partner. Everything else is true and they have a track record of warning investors about projects. So that’s libel and targeted attack out of play.

You guys keep shouting "unethical", but again, CMC has a track record of warning investors, which again, would be favorable for them in a court of law.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Respectfully, I know the law better than 95% of the people on this board. Besides having multiple encounters with the law, I actually studied contract law, and though it’s not criminal law, there are overlaps. I don’t know if it’s emotions, and because you have your money in it, but what you are saying makes no sense.

CMC has a track record of putting up warning on projects. This has been verified by @papa surf in this thread. It’s their responsibility, if/when such information is available to them, to make it known to investors. In fact, it’s something actually commendable. This wasn’t a single nor isolated incident in which they specifically targeted Saitama. They have done this before for other projects. as such; you cannot attest nor assert to as to their intentions. And even if their intention was to sabotage Saitama, again, the information is true. You cannot sue for libel/slander nor defamation because someone reported publicly available information brehette. Newspapers wouldn’t exist if you could do that

Again, something being unethical or assumed to be such doesn’t inherently translate into not being legal. Saitama didn’t say they could/would “possibly” look at a lawsuit for no reason. There’s no substantial grounds for one, thus “frivolous lawsuit”.

There are separate laws that apply to corporations and organizations that don't apply to you. So you personal experience isn't applicable to this situation.

Furthermore, the company has never put out personal information of one individual in order to manipulate the market of a coin.

If what they did was so right and correct they would have kept it up. But they removed it with the quickness as soon as the lawyers made the call.

The legality of the matter is yet to be determined and not by you

 

[Uchiha God]

There are separate laws that apply to corporations and organizations that don't apply to you. So you personal experience isn't applicable to this situation.

Furthermore, the company has never put out personal information of one individual in order to manipulate the market of a coin.

If what they did was so right and correct they would have kept it up. But they removed it with the quickness as soon as the lawyers made the call.

The legality of the matter is yet to be determined and not by you

My god My personal experiences give me insight into and knowledge of the law, which was a direct response to your "that's not how the law works" assertion.

It is public record.

The notice was likely removed due to their assertion that Willie D is a partner. Which Willie D has contested. Which I've reiterated multiple times, it is the one point of contention.

You keep saying "in order to manipulate the market of a coin" and I've told you multiple times this cannot be established. It's pretty much coli babble from a legal point of view.

Thus me questioning what would be grounds for a lawsuit here. Libel and targeted attack are not in play.

you know what Saitama will sue CMC and CMC will have to pay hundreds of millions in punitive damages, which will be re-invested into Saitama and take the token to $100. There

 

[Detroit Wave]

fukk all this other shyt, is this coin a flop or not?

 

[ORDER_66]

fukk all this other shyt, is this coin a flop or not?

 

[Detroit Wave]

Looks dead to me price def ain’t been rising unless you’re seeing something I’m not

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

My god My personal experiences give me insight into and knowledge of the law, which was a direct response to your "that's not how the law works" assertion.

It is public record.

The notice was likely removed due to their assertion that Willie D is a partner. Which Willie D has contested. Which I've reiterated multiple times, it is the one point of contention.

You keep saying "in order to manipulate the market of a coin" and I've told you multiple times this cannot be established. It's pretty much coli babble from a legal point of view.

Thus me questioning what would be grounds for a lawsuit here. Libel and targeted attack are not in play.

you know what Saitama will sue CMC and CMC will have to pay hundreds of millions in punitive damages, which will be re-invested into Saitama and take the token to $100. There

Calm down. You're not a corporate lawyer. I never said anything about defamation and you have no idea what evidence does or does not exist.

And that last little emotional bit at the end, no one brought up. If the result is Binance listing the coin and CMC being held liable for unethical practices that’s fine with me.

Again, the result is yet be determined.

 

[Uchiha God]

Calm down. You're not a corporate lawyer. I never said anything about defamation and you have no idea what evidence does or does not exist.

And that last little emotional bit at the end, no one brought up. If the result is Binance listing the coin and CMC being held liable for unethical practices that’s fine with me.

Again, the result is yet be determined.

Pivoting from coli babble to "calm down" It's only so much back and forth you can do when people are choosing to be obtuse.

You don't have to be a corporate lawyer to know law. Ineffective ad hominem attacks don't further a conversation.

I have not spoken on nor asserted anything in regards to evidence. I've merely spoken on easily verifiable facts; Willie D's record and CMC's track record. You cannot establish their intent to "manipulate the market of a coin" based on what's known to us. That was your assertion. The onus is on you to prove it. Not on me to prove a negative.

Binance is a major exchange. If Saitama is to deliver on a grand scale, I'd hope they'd have made contact with Binance about listing long before/independently of a comical lawsuit. Attributing or correlating a potential listing to threats of frivolous lawsuits is funny for many reasons, all things considered.

"the result is yet to be determined" is akin to stating "the sun will rise". My opening on this matter was "what would even be the grounds for a lawsuit against CMC?"

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Pivoting from coli babble to "calm down" It's only so much back and forth you can do when people are choosing to be obtuse.

You don't have to be a corporate lawyer to know law. Ineffective ad hominem attacks don't further a conversation.

I have not spoken on nor asserted anything in regards to evidence. I've merely spoken on easily verifiable facts; Willie D's record and CMC's track record. You cannot establish their intent to "manipulate the market of a coin" based on what's known to us. That was your assertion. The onus is on you to prove it. Not on me to prove a negative.

Binance is a major exchange. If Saitama is to deliver on a grand scale, I'd hope they'd have made contact with Binance about listing long before/independently of a comical lawsuit. Attributing or correlating a potential listing to threats of frivolous lawsuits is funny for many reasons, all things considered.

"the result is yet to be determined" is akin to stating "the sun will rise". My opening on this matter was "what would even be the grounds for a lawsuit against CMC?"

You keep repeating yourself and you admitted that your knowledge of the law is limited.

But I hear you.

It doesn't change the fact that you don't have enough knowledge about the situation or law to be considered an expert.

Again I will wait for the outcome. Thanks for your input.

 

[Uchiha God]

You keep repeating yourself and you admitted that your knowledge of the law is limited.

But I hear you.

It doesn't change the fact that you don't have enough knowledge about the situation or law to be considered an expert.

Again I will wait for the outcome. Thanks for your input.

Repeating myself is a necessity when the people I'm replying to repeat themselves.

Everyone's knowledge of anything is limited. I didn't present nor position myself as an expert. I know law though. Evidently more so than some in this thread, and I only spoke on what's known publicly and can be verified.

As will the rest of us. You're welcome. Although my initial input wasn't a verdict or statement of outcome. I'm invested in Saitama and simply said I'd rather they focus full efforts on securing major exchanges rather than frivolous lawsuits, not that they are mutually exclusive, but I want to make money as soon as possible and don't care about alleged sinister crypto plots and agendas

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Repeating myself is a necessity when the people I'm replying to repeat themselves.

Everyone's knowledge of anything is limited. I didn't present nor position myself as an expert. I know law though. Evidently more so than some in this thread, and I only spoke on what's known publicly and can be verified.

As will the rest of us. You're welcome. Although my initial input wasn't a verdict or statement of outcome. I'm invested in Saitama and simply said I'd rather they focus full efforts on securing major exchanges rather than frivolous lawsuits, not that they are mutually exclusive, but I want to make money as soon as possible and don't care about alleged sinister crypto plots and agendas

I hear you

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Willie D wants that smoke

 

[mannyrs13]

Respectfully, I know the law better than 95% of the people on this board. Besides having multiple encounters with the law, I actually studied contract law, and though it’s not criminal law, there are overlaps. I don’t know if it’s emotions, and because you have your money in it, but what you are saying makes no sense.

CMC has a track record of putting up warning on projects. This has been verified by @papa surf in this thread. It’s their responsibility, if/when such information is available to them, to make it known to investors. In fact, it’s something actually commendable. This wasn’t a single nor isolated incident in which they specifically targeted Saitama. They have done this before for other projects. as such; you cannot attest nor assert to as to their intentions. And even if their intention was to sabotage Saitama, again, the information is true. You cannot sue for libel/slander nor defamation because someone reported publicly available information brehette. Newspapers wouldn’t exist if you could do that

Again, something being unethical or assumed to be such doesn’t inherently translate into not being legal. Saitama didn’t say they could/would “possibly” look at a lawsuit for no reason. There’s no substantial grounds for one, thus “frivolous lawsuit”.

Only difference is those other warnings had something to do with the coin and not about one of its supposed partners. They might say the contract address was changed or even worse liquidity was pulled. But have they ever said something like someone was arrested when it's not about the coin?

 

[ORDER_66]

Looks dead to me price def ain’t been rising unless you’re seeing something I’m not

it's sideways wait f0r Saitamask

 

[mannyrs13]

Almost at 250k. 132 more to go. Just need an exchange listing soon. Come on, kucoin.