Saints Row IV trailer starring Keith David as...

One4Deuce

Pro
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
1,249
Reputation
100
Daps
1,284
Reppin
Minnesota
I've enjoyed all the Saints Row games but didn't like where the third one went at times. I enjoyed 1 and 2, 3 got a little weird. The plot of 4 sounds awful. I'm not interested in the alien/government, etc. shyt. With that said, I'll probably give the game a shot, they're entertaining.
 

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,122
Reputation
2,636
Daps
59,906
I totaly agree with this.

For me games are supposed to be fun. Everything else is secondary. It seems like games get too much praise for graphics/presentation and not enough praise for gameplay.

GTA will always score higher than Saints Row because of graphics. But saints row will always be the better GAME.
I think I have broken it down here before, but I figured out what kind of gamer I am. Some people prefer the more serious tone of GTA IV, but to me its such a big world and to have such a serious tone to it kinda gets old after a while.

That's not to say I hate games that are serious and driven by story because I loved Max Payne 3, I like the Splinter Cell series, and I think The Last of Us will be something for me. Whats makes those games similar? Linear...One story focused and thought out over 10-12 hours is what works for me. I don't want to find myself in a situation in where I am trying to save someone's life...then be thrown off and do some little side mission somewhere else you know what I'm saying? The only game that stuck with me from Rockstar that was open world was RDR...I mean that damn game was just...that environment, that bold move by them to take it there :wow2:

I loved Fallout 3 because there was one main objective...save the world. GTA has had its stories chopped up into so many different directions and I never truly felt satisfied...the only one I finished in the franchise was Vice City because it held my interest throughout. I almost finished San Andreas, but got bored towards the end as well.

Saints Row is fukkery at all times...thats what I expect going in and they deliver. This shyt right here man...this is what I am talking about :russ:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bud Bundy

A Bundy never cares
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,984
Reputation
1,632
Daps
22,463
Saints row is like gta drunk younger brother. Fun but not doing anything with its life.
 

Arcavian

Him Downstairs
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
19,725
Reputation
3,573
Daps
66,794
Reppin
Texas
I thought they were gonna bring back Julius for a second....


With that said this game looks dumb as fukk
 

samtalksradio

Banned
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
2,765
Reputation
-1,640
Daps
5,093
Reppin
Belle Glade FL
Wait you people are complaining that a video game is doing what a game is suppose to do(gaming isnt suppose to be realistic)what ever looks fun it'll hold me over until GTA5
 

planD

Legends Live Forever
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
622
Reputation
210
Daps
835
This shyt looks goofy as hell, not feeling the direction at all, still copping though.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
I totaly agree with this.

For me games are supposed to be fun. Everything else is secondary. It seems like games get too much praise for graphics/presentation and not enough praise for gameplay.

GTA will always score higher than Saints Row because of graphics. But saints row will always be the better GAME.
dont lie to yourself.

GTA was the better game PERIOD. not because of better graphics. but because of gameplay and the game world you were immersed in. no one does a better job then rockstar of putting you in a time period and location, then making you feel like you're actually there. NO ONE does it better.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,941
Reputation
3,784
Daps
110,120
Reppin
Tha Land
dont lie to yourself.

GTA was the better game PERIOD. not because of better graphics. but because of gameplay and the game world you were immersed in. no one does a better job then rockstar of putting you in a time period and location, then making you feel like you're actually there. NO ONE does it better.
I agree with the bolded. It's just my opinion that other things are more important in a game. GTA was the better entertainment experience, saints row was the better GAME.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
Wait you people are complaining that a video game is doing what a game is suppose to do(gaming isnt suppose to be realistic)what ever looks fun it'll hold me over until GTA5

who told you gaming isnt supposed to be realistic? what rule is that?

oh i see, you still want this
220px-Double_Dribble.png


instead of this

11709567-large.jpg




:comeon:


you the kind of clown that thinks this is hotter
Combat+%25281977%2529+%2528Atari%2529+%2528PAL%2529_66.png


then this

World+Of+Tanks.jpg



sorry aint nobody buying that nonsense you selling. games have been evolving to look more realistic since PONG.

1pong.gif



in-pictures-rare-embraces-kinect-sports_10.jpg
 

Objection

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,352
Reputation
684
Daps
11,581
Reppin
Louisiana
I loved SR2 and how it ended. Then to play SR3 and see the direction they took it in I wasn't happy. The gameplay was still fun but I enjoyed the random hood shyt. Doesn't seem like its ever going back in that direction.
 
Top