Russia's Invasion of Ukraine (Official Thread)

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
87,398
Reputation
3,561
Daps
155,186
Reppin
Brooklyn







Why is it you support this again @Robbie3000 ?
 
Last edited:

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,699
Reputation
4,493
Daps
79,709
Reppin
The Arsenal







Why is it you support this again @Robbie3000 ?

wait he supports russia's right to take territory? i don't pay much attention to the israel palestine thread, but he's not a hypocrite like you and supporting the wrong side on one war and the right side on the other? right? at least you're jewish so it makes sense you'll be on the wrong side on that one. i don't get people advocating for russia's right to take and then being against israel taking. pootin and nutty are the same person.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,641
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364

Putin’s ‘Victory Day’ offensive in northern Ukraine has backfired spectacularly​

Biden finally unties the Ukrainians’ hands, and Belgorod comes under the hammer

DAVID AXE5 June 2024 • 11:28am

Related Topics
127

tmg.video.placeholder.alt xIzRWDPOO0g

When a combined force of 40,000 Russian troops launched an assault across Ukraine’s northern border with Russia on May 9 – that’s Victory Day, the day Russians celebrate the Soviet defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II – observers tried to understand the Russians’ aim.

Was the goal to drive on Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second city just 25 miles south of the northern border? Was it to capture a string of border settlements in order to push Ukrainian troops, and their artillery, farther from Russia? Was it to convince the Ukrainians that either of the above was the goal – and compel them to shift forces from the east to the north, thus weakening their eastern defenses?

Nearly a month later, it hardly matters anymore. Russia’s Victory Day offensive has failed on all counts. Ukraine can thank the resilience of its weary infantry, the foresight of its leaders, rush shipments of munitions from the United States and, equally, the sheer stupidity and over-confidence of Russia’s own leaders.

The same leaders who promised, before their 2022 wider invasion of Ukraine, that the so-called “special military operation” would end in just three days, with a Russian flag flying over Kyiv. The whole Russian war on Ukraine is stupid. The Victory Day offensive is just more of the same.

If the Russians’ goal was to drive on Kharkiv and capture a major Ukrainian city, they failed within days. After routing some lightly armed Ukrainian territorial troops and seizing a few evacuated border villages, the new Russian northern grouping of forces advanced into Vovchansk, the first fortified Ukrainian town standing between the border and Kharkiv.

There, they ran into Ukrainian reinforcements, including paratroopers from the elite 82nd Air Assault Brigade. No longer jumping from airplanes like they did before the war, the paratroopers now ride in American-supplied Stryker fighting vehicles. With their speed, maneuverability and high-end sensors, the 20-ton, eight-wheeled vehicles are ideal for urban fights. US Army veterans have described Strykers as their mobile bases in America’s recent wars.

The Russians never got very far into Vovchansk – and certainly never got past it. Of course, it’s always possible they never wanted to get past it. That, instead, they merely wanted to create a buffer zone between Ukrainian artillery and Russian bases in, say, Belgorod, 20 miles north of the border. Pushing Ukrainian gunners back just a few miles has put Belgorod out of the range of most of Ukraine’s less sophisticated big guns.

But if a buffer zone was the offensive’s main objective, the offensive not only failed – it backfired, big time. For more than two years, the administration of US president Joe Biden had happily provided Ukraine with some of America’s best long-range munitions, including Army Tactical Missile System ballistic missiles ranging as far as 190 miles and Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System weapons ranging 57 miles. Both of these are typically fired from the Himars vehicle. But fearing “escalation,” Biden had warned the Ukrainians not to use these munitions to strike targets inside Russia. Only targets in occupied Ukraine were allowed.

The Victory Day offensive – and the looming threat to more than a million civilians in Kharkiv – changed Biden’s mind. On May 31, he loosened the restrictions on Ukraine’s American-made weapons – allowing them to strike targets just north of the border with Russia. Suddenly Belgorod, the main base for the Victory Day offensive, was fair game.

Within hours of Biden changing the policy, Ukrainian HIMARS bombarded Belgorod. As a direct consequence of the Russian offensive, more and better Ukrainian weapons are striking deeper inside Russia.

And even if the Russians don’t care about capturing Kharkiv, and don’t mind getting rocketed in Belgorod – if, that is, the whole Victory Day offensive was a feint – the offensive still failed. Yes, the Ukrainian military moved entire battalions, perhaps entire brigades, from the south and east to the north in order to meet the Russian advance.

But they had the forces to spare. Lawmakers in Kyiv finally approved a new mobilisation law right before Victory Day – and it came into effect just days after the Russians attacked across the border. Moreover, the US Congress finally managed to break a logjam caused by a handful of pro-Russia lawmakers and approved $61 billion in fresh aid for Ukraine in mid-April, ending a six-month blockade that had starved Ukrainian forces of vital equipment and ammunition.

In a fit of optimism that actually paid off, the general staff in Kyiv had begun forming new brigades even before the mobilisation law and US aid got approved. The mobilisation law provided the new recruits. The US aid armed them. And the Ukrainian military had enough well-armed troops to maintain its positions in the south and east while reinforcing them in the north.

Whatever their aim in the north, the Russians met stiffer resistance than they surely expected. Which might be the main narrative of the whole wider war.
 

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
32,719
Reputation
1,406
Daps
60,892
Reppin
got a call for three nines

1/1
M2 Bradley shows how it’s done.

: 47th Mechanized Brigade


To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196

And there’s no reason the Americans can’t send a lot more M-2s. The U.S. Army no longer uses the model of the Bradley that Ukraine uses—and there should be around a thousand of them sitting in the Army’s sprawling storage sites, including one in California currently holding around 500 of the vehicles.

 

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
32,719
Reputation
1,406
Daps
60,892
Reppin
got a call for three nines

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,641
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,641
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,364

Opinion​

More evidence of the idiocy of Vladimir Putin​

The war in Ukraine has turned Russia’s biggest company into a massive money loser.

By David Von Drehle

Deputy opinion editor and columnist|

June 6, 2024 at 12:53 p.m. EDT


Russian President Vladimir Putin, flanked by Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller, in St. Petersburg on Wednesday. (Alexander Kazakov/Pool/AFP/Getty Images)



Further evidence — not that any was needed — of the catastrophic idiocy of Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine is found in an internal study commissioned by Gazprom, a state-controlled energy firm and the largest company in Russia. As revealed by the Financial Times, the analysis concluded that the loss of European customers for Russian natural gas in response to Putin’s aggression cannot be made up by exports elsewhere for at least a decade.

The lone economic bright spot in a country that Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) properly described as “a gas station masquerading as a country” has been snuffed by Russia’s deranged leader. In coming decades, the war will be seen as one of history’s worst self-inflicted wounds, an own-goal of epic proportions for which the long-suffering Russian people will suffer further.

Russia is not a country that can afford to destroy profitable businesses. Its entire economy is smaller than that of Texas. Yet that’s what Putin has done. Proof of the damage to Gazprom came last month, when the state-controlled company reported its first annual loss of the 21st century — the first of many to come.

Exporting large amounts of natural gas can be done in two ways: through pipelines and (when refrigerated to very low temperatures) in tanks as liquid. Having invested little in liquefied natural gas (LNG), Gazprom is heavily dependent on pipelines, and its pipelines are heavily dependent on Europe.

imrs.php
Follow David Von Drehle's opinions

Follow

Pipelines are not built overnight. In fact, nearly 28 months after Putin’s failing invasion of Ukraine, China has yet to agree to the concept of a second pipeline from Russia to offset partially the loss of European exports. With spigots to the West turned off and China dragging its heels, the report concluded, according to the Financial Times, that Gazprom will not return to profitability before 2035.

This is the opposite of propaganda. It is a truth that Russian insiders are admitting to themselves. Their golden goose has been roasted on the whim of their delusional boss, and next up for the Russian economy is likely to be Venezuelan-style inflation, as the cost of the ruinous war is paid in currency that has scant economic output to bolster it.

It’s not difficult to imagine that the appearance of this sober conclusion in the Western media is a cry for help from inside the increasingly oppressive Russian state. Putin’s lackeys have silenced critics while flooding Russian media — and gullible Westerners — with claims that China has saved the sanctioned economy and victory over Ukraine is nigh. Now, from the upper reaches of the state kleptocracy, comes proof that even Putin’s oligarchs aren’t buying his baloney.

It’s time for President Biden to ensure the taming of Russia by reversing one of his most shortsighted panders — his regulatory “pause” on development of facilities for exporting LNG. This action — a sop to the climate caucus of the Democratic base, which wrongly believes that all fossil fuels are equally bad — will slow what had been the rapid emergence of U.S. exports as an alternative to Russian gas. In fact, for the first time, last year, the United States surpassed Russia in sales of natural gas to the European Union.

As an environmental policy, the LNG pause is a flop. Use of abundant natural gas supplies — the United States has become the world’s leading energy producer — to replace much dirtier coal in generating electricity has been a major factor in the decline of carbon emissions in the United States. Natural gas can do the same in other heavily coal-dependent countries, notably China and India, where emissions are rising dangerously. Opposition to LNG is mere virtue signaling; matters of war and climate are too serious for the White House to indulge in it.

The pause is also bad for the security of the United States and its allies. By invading a neighbor and waging a war of unremitting criminality, Russia has shown itself to be an insufferable threat to Western safety and humane values. Don’t take it from me. Take it from the people who know Russia best: its neighbors.

Poland’s spending on defense rose about 70 percent last year. Sweden, after going it alone for nearly 75 years, joined NATO in March (following Finland) and has hiked its defense budget by just above 30 percent. Lithuania boosted defense spending by nearly 30 percent. And so on. Since Putin’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, Europe as a whole has increased spending on defense every year.

Those countries don’t want to resume their dependence on Russia when the war in Ukraine finally ends. They want alternatives to Russian gas, and for the peace of the world, the United States should give them one.

Don’t believe Putin’s desperate hogwash about Russian strength and Russian victory. The backbone of his economy, Gazprom — a company far more important to its country than any single company has ever been to the United States — has shown us the truth. Now is not the time, Mr. President, to take your foot off the gas.
 
Top