@88m3 @Leasy @ADevilYouKhow @GzUp @wire28 @Atlrocafella @@ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @dtownreppin214
RUSSIA đˇđş Thread: Wikileaks=FSB front, UKRAINE?, SNOWED LIED; NATO Aggression; Trump = Putins B!tch
- Thread starter âď¸#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
@88m3 @Leasy @ADevilYouKhow @GzUp @wire28 @Atlrocafella @@ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @dtownreppin214
@Abogado @FAH1223 you two especially need this as background reading.
@88m3 @Leasy @ADevilYouKhow @GzUp @wire28 @Atlrocafella @@ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @dtownreppin214
The Fable of Edward Snowden
The Fable of Edward Snowden
As he seeks a pardon, the NSA thief has told multiple lies about what he stole and his dealings with Russian intelligence.
By
Edward Jay Epstein
Updated Dec. 30, 2016 10:21 p.m. ET
Opinion Journal Video: Investigative Journalist Edward Jay Epstein on why the American spy doesnât deserve a presidential pardon. Photo: Reuters
Of all the lies that Edward Snowden has told since his massive theft of secrets from the National Security Agency and his journey to Russia via Hong Kong in 2013, none is more provocative than the claim that he never intended to engage in espionage, and was only a âwhistleblowerâ seeking to expose the overreach of NSAâs information gathering. With the clock ticking on Mr. Snowdenâs chance of a pardon, now is a good time to review what we have learned about his real mission.
Mr. Snowdenâs theft of Americaâs most closely guarded communication secrets occurred in May 2013, according to the criminal complaint filed against him by federal prosecutors the following month. At the time Mr. Snowden was a 29-year-old technologist working as an analyst-in-training for the consulting firm of Booz AllenHamilton at the regional base of the National Security Agency (NSA) in Oahu, Hawaii. On May 20, only some six weeks after his job there began, he failed to show up for work, emailing his supervisor that he was at the hospital being tested for epilepsy.
This excuse was untrue. Mr. Snowden was not even in Hawaii. He was in Hong Kong. He had flown there with a cache of secret data that he had stolen from the NSA.
This was not the only lie Mr. Snowden told. As became clear during my investigation over the past three years, nearly every element of the narrative Mr. Snowden has provided, which reached its final iteration in Oliver Stoneâs 2016 movie, âSnowden,â is demonstrably false.
This narrative began soon after Mr. Snowden arrived in Hong Kong, where he arranged to meet with Laura Poitras, a Berlin-based documentary filmmaker, and Glenn Greenwald, a Brazil-based blogger for the Guardian. Both journalists were longtime critics of NSA surveillance with whom Mr. Snowden (under the alias Citizen Four) had been in contact for four months.
To provide them with scoops discrediting NSA operations, Mr. Snowden culled several thousand documents out of his huge cache of stolen material, including two explosive documents he asked them to use in their initial stories. One was the now-famous secret order from Americaâs Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court requiring Verizon to turn over to the NSA its billing records for its phone users in the U.S. The other was an NSA slide presentation detailing its ability to intercept communications of non-American users of the internet via a joint program with the FBI code-named Prism.
These documents were published in 2013 on June 5 and 6, followed by a video in which he identified himself as the leaker and a whistleblower.
At the heart of Mr. Snowdenâs narrative was his claim that while he may have incidentally âtouchedâ other data in his search of NSA files, he took only documents that exposed the malfeasance of the NSA and gave all of them to journalists.
Yet even as Mr. Snowdenâs narrative was taking hold in the public realm, a secret damage assessment done by the NSA and Pentagon told a very different story. According to a unanimous report declassified on Dec. 22 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the investigation showed that Mr. Snowden had âremovedâ (not merely touched) 1.5 million documents. That huge number was based on, among other evidence, electronic logs that recorded the selection, copying and moving of documents.
The number of purloined documents is more than what NSA officials were willing to say in 2013 about the removal of data, possibly because the House committee had the benefit of the Pentagonâs more-extensive investigation. But even just taking into account the material that Mr. Snowden handed over to journalists, the December House report concluded that he compromised âsecrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nation-states.â These were, the report said, âmerely the tip of the iceberg.â
The Pentagonâs investigation during 2013 and 2014 employed hundreds of military-intelligence officers, working around the clock, to review all 1.5 million documents. Most had nothing to do with domestic surveillance or whistle blowing. They were mainly military secrets, as Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified before the House Armed Services Committee on March 6, 2014.
It was not the quantity of Mr. Snowdenâs theft but the quality that was most telling. Mr. Snowdenâs theft put documents at risk that could reveal the NSAâs Level 3 tool kitâa reference to documents containing the NSAâs most-important sources and methods. Since the agency was created in 1952, Russia and other adversary nations had been trying to penetrate its Level-3 secrets without great success.
Yet it was precisely these secrets that Mr. Snowden changed jobs to steal. In an interview in Hong Kongâs South China Morning Post on June 15, 2013, he said he sought to work on a Booz Allen contract at the CIA, even at a cut in pay, because it gave him access to secret lists of computers that the NSA was tapping into around the world.
He evidently succeeded. In a 2014 interview with Vanity Fair, Richard Ledgett, the NSA executive who headed the damage-assessment team, described one lengthy document taken by Mr. Snowden that, if it fell into the wrong hands, would provide a âroad mapâ to what targets abroad the NSA was, and was not, covering. It contained the requests made by the 17 U.S. services in the so-called Intelligence Community for NSA interceptions abroad.
On June 23, less than two weeks after Mr. Snowden released the video that helped present his narrative, he left Hong Kong and flew to Moscow, where he received protection by the Russian government. In much of the media coverage that followed, the ultimate destination of these stolen secrets was fogged overâif not totally obscured from the publicâby the unverified claims that Mr. Snowden was spoon feeding to handpicked journalists.
In his narrative, Mr. Snowden always claims that he was a conscientious âwhistleblowerâ who turned over all the stolen NSA material to journalists in Hong Kong. He has insisted he had no intention of defecting to Russia but was on his way to Latin America when he was trapped in Russia by the U.S. government in an attempt to demonize him.
For example, in October 2014, he told the editor of the Nation, âIâm in exile. My government revoked my passport intentionally to leave me exiledâ and âchose to keep me in Russia.â According to Mr. Snowden, the U.S. government accomplished this entrapment by suspending his passport while he was in midair after he departed Hong Kong on June 23, thus forcing him into the hands of President Vladimir Putinâs regime.
None of this is true. The State Department invalidated Mr. Snowdenâs passport while he was still in Hong Kong, not after he left for Moscow on June 23. The âConsul General-Hong Kong confirmed that Hong Kong authorities were notified that Mr. Snowdenâs passport was revoked June 22,â according to the State Departmentâs senior watch officer, as reported by ABC news on June 23, 2013.
Mr. Snowden could not have been unaware of the governmentâs pursuit of him, since the criminal complaint against him, which was filed June 14, had been headline news in Hong Kong. That the U.S. acted against him while he was still in Hong Kong is of great importance to the timeline because it points to the direct involvement of Aeroflot, an airline which the Russian government effectively controls. Aeroflot bypassed its normal procedures to allow Mr. Snowden to board the Moscow flightâeven though he had neither a valid passport nor a Russian visa, as his newly assigned lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, said at a press conference in Russia on July 12, 2013.
By falsely claiming his passport was invalidated after the plane departed Hong Kongâinstead of before he leftâMr. Snowden hoped to conceal this extraordinary waiver. The Russian government further revealed its helping hand, judging by a report in Russiaâs Izvestia newspaper when, on arrival, Mr. Snowden was taken off the plane by a security team in a âspecial operation.â
Nor was it any kind of accident. Vladimir Putin personally authorized this assistance after Mr. Snowden met with Russian officials in Hong Kong, as Mr. Putin admitted in a televised press conference on Sept. 2, 2013.
To provide a smokescreen for Mr. Snowdenâs escape from Hong Kong, WikiLeaks (an organization that the Obama administration asserted to be a tool of Russian intelligence after the hacking of Democratic Party leadersâ email in 2016) booked a dozen or more diversionary flight reservations to other destinations for Mr. Snowden.
WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange also dispatched Sarah Harrison, his deputy at WikiLeaks, to fly to Hong Kong to pay Mr. Snowdenâs expenses and escort him to Moscow. In short, Mr. Snowdenâs arrival in Moscow was neither accidental nor the work of the U.S. government.
Mr. Snowdenâs own narrative asserts that he came to Russia not only empty-handed but without access to any of the stolen material. He wrote in Vanity Fair in 2014 that he had destroyed all of it before arriving in Moscowâthe very data that he went to such lengths to steal a few weeks earlier in Hawaii.
As it turns out, this claim is also untrue. It is belied by two Kremlin insiders who were in a position to know what Mr. Snowden actually brought with him to Moscow. One of them, Frants Klintsevich, was the first deputy chairman of the defense and security committee of the Duma (Russiaâs parliament) at the time of Mr. Snowdenâs defection. âLetâs be frank,â Mr. Klintsevich said in a taped interview with NPR in June 2016, âMr. Snowden did share intelligence. This is what security services do.â
The other insider was Anatoly Kucherena, a well-connected Moscow lawyer and Mr. Putinâs friend. Mr. Kucherena served as the intermediary between Mr. Snowden and Russian authorities. On Sept. 23, 2013, Mr. Kucherena gave a long interview to Sophie Shevardnadze, a journalist for Russia Today television.
When Ms. Shevardnadze directly asked him if Mr. Snowden had given all the documents he had taken from the NSA to journalists in Hong Kong, Mr. Kucherena said Mr. Snowden had only given âsomeâ of the NSAâs documents in his possession to journalists in Hong Kong. âSo he [Mr. Snowden] does have some materials that havenât been made public yet?â Ms. Shevardnadze asked. âCertainly,â Mr. Kucherena answered.
This disclosure filled in a crucial piece of the puzzle. It explained why NSA documents that Mr. Snowden had copied, but had not given to the journalists in Hong Kongâsuch as the embarrassing revelation about the NSA targeting the cellphone of German Chancellor Angela Merkelâcontinued to surface after Mr. Snowden arrived in Moscow, along with NSA documents released via WikiLeaks.
As this was a critical discrepancy in Mr. Snowdenâs narrative, I went to Moscow in October 2015 to see Mr. Kucherena. During our conversation, Mr. Kucherena confirmed that his interview with Ms. Shevardnadze was accurate, and that Mr. Snowden had brought secret material with him to Moscow.
Mr. Snowdenâs narrative also includes the assertion that he was neither debriefed by nor even met with any Russian government official after he arrived in Moscow. This part of the narrative runs counter to findings of U.S. intelligence. According to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report, Mr. Snowden, since he arrived in Moscow, âhas had, and continues to have, contact with Russian intelligence services.â This finding is consistent with Russian debriefing practices, as described by the ex-KGB officers with whom I spoke in Moscow
Mr. Snowden also publicly claimed in Moscow in December 2013 to have secrets in his head, including âaccess to every target, every active operation. Full lists of them.â Could Mr. Snowdenâs Russian hosts ignore such an opportunity after Mr. Putin had authorized his exfiltration to Moscow? Mr. Snowden, with no exit options, was in the palm of their hands. Under such circumstances, as Mr. Klintsevich pointed out in his June NPR interview: âIf thereâs a possibility to get information, they [the Russian intelligence services] will get it.â
The transfer of state secrets from Mr. Snowden to Russia did not occur in a vacuum. The intelligence war did not end with the termination of the Cold War; it shifted to cyberspace. Even if Russia could not match the NSAâs state-of-the-art sensors, computers and productive partnerships with the cipher services of Britain, Israel, Germany and other allies, it could nullify the U.S. agencyâs edge by obtaining its sources and methods from even a single contractor with access to Level 3 documents.
Russian intelligence uses a single umbrella term to cover anyone who delivers it secret intelligence. Whether a person acted out of idealistic motives, sold information for money or remained clueless of the role he or she played in the transfer of secretsâthe provider of secret data is considered an âespionage source.â By any measure, it is a job description that fits Mr. Snowden.
Mr. Epsteinâs book, âHow America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft,â will be published by Knopf in January.
The Fable of Edward Snowden
As he seeks a pardon, the NSA thief has told multiple lies about what he stole and his dealings with Russian intelligence.
By
Edward Jay Epstein
Updated Dec. 30, 2016 10:21 p.m. ET
Opinion Journal Video: Investigative Journalist Edward Jay Epstein on why the American spy doesnât deserve a presidential pardon. Photo: Reuters
Of all the lies that Edward Snowden has told since his massive theft of secrets from the National Security Agency and his journey to Russia via Hong Kong in 2013, none is more provocative than the claim that he never intended to engage in espionage, and was only a âwhistleblowerâ seeking to expose the overreach of NSAâs information gathering. With the clock ticking on Mr. Snowdenâs chance of a pardon, now is a good time to review what we have learned about his real mission.
Mr. Snowdenâs theft of Americaâs most closely guarded communication secrets occurred in May 2013, according to the criminal complaint filed against him by federal prosecutors the following month. At the time Mr. Snowden was a 29-year-old technologist working as an analyst-in-training for the consulting firm of Booz AllenHamilton at the regional base of the National Security Agency (NSA) in Oahu, Hawaii. On May 20, only some six weeks after his job there began, he failed to show up for work, emailing his supervisor that he was at the hospital being tested for epilepsy.
This excuse was untrue. Mr. Snowden was not even in Hawaii. He was in Hong Kong. He had flown there with a cache of secret data that he had stolen from the NSA.
This was not the only lie Mr. Snowden told. As became clear during my investigation over the past three years, nearly every element of the narrative Mr. Snowden has provided, which reached its final iteration in Oliver Stoneâs 2016 movie, âSnowden,â is demonstrably false.
This narrative began soon after Mr. Snowden arrived in Hong Kong, where he arranged to meet with Laura Poitras, a Berlin-based documentary filmmaker, and Glenn Greenwald, a Brazil-based blogger for the Guardian. Both journalists were longtime critics of NSA surveillance with whom Mr. Snowden (under the alias Citizen Four) had been in contact for four months.
To provide them with scoops discrediting NSA operations, Mr. Snowden culled several thousand documents out of his huge cache of stolen material, including two explosive documents he asked them to use in their initial stories. One was the now-famous secret order from Americaâs Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court requiring Verizon to turn over to the NSA its billing records for its phone users in the U.S. The other was an NSA slide presentation detailing its ability to intercept communications of non-American users of the internet via a joint program with the FBI code-named Prism.
These documents were published in 2013 on June 5 and 6, followed by a video in which he identified himself as the leaker and a whistleblower.
At the heart of Mr. Snowdenâs narrative was his claim that while he may have incidentally âtouchedâ other data in his search of NSA files, he took only documents that exposed the malfeasance of the NSA and gave all of them to journalists.
Yet even as Mr. Snowdenâs narrative was taking hold in the public realm, a secret damage assessment done by the NSA and Pentagon told a very different story. According to a unanimous report declassified on Dec. 22 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the investigation showed that Mr. Snowden had âremovedâ (not merely touched) 1.5 million documents. That huge number was based on, among other evidence, electronic logs that recorded the selection, copying and moving of documents.
The number of purloined documents is more than what NSA officials were willing to say in 2013 about the removal of data, possibly because the House committee had the benefit of the Pentagonâs more-extensive investigation. But even just taking into account the material that Mr. Snowden handed over to journalists, the December House report concluded that he compromised âsecrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nation-states.â These were, the report said, âmerely the tip of the iceberg.â
The Pentagonâs investigation during 2013 and 2014 employed hundreds of military-intelligence officers, working around the clock, to review all 1.5 million documents. Most had nothing to do with domestic surveillance or whistle blowing. They were mainly military secrets, as Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified before the House Armed Services Committee on March 6, 2014.
It was not the quantity of Mr. Snowdenâs theft but the quality that was most telling. Mr. Snowdenâs theft put documents at risk that could reveal the NSAâs Level 3 tool kitâa reference to documents containing the NSAâs most-important sources and methods. Since the agency was created in 1952, Russia and other adversary nations had been trying to penetrate its Level-3 secrets without great success.
Yet it was precisely these secrets that Mr. Snowden changed jobs to steal. In an interview in Hong Kongâs South China Morning Post on June 15, 2013, he said he sought to work on a Booz Allen contract at the CIA, even at a cut in pay, because it gave him access to secret lists of computers that the NSA was tapping into around the world.
He evidently succeeded. In a 2014 interview with Vanity Fair, Richard Ledgett, the NSA executive who headed the damage-assessment team, described one lengthy document taken by Mr. Snowden that, if it fell into the wrong hands, would provide a âroad mapâ to what targets abroad the NSA was, and was not, covering. It contained the requests made by the 17 U.S. services in the so-called Intelligence Community for NSA interceptions abroad.
On June 23, less than two weeks after Mr. Snowden released the video that helped present his narrative, he left Hong Kong and flew to Moscow, where he received protection by the Russian government. In much of the media coverage that followed, the ultimate destination of these stolen secrets was fogged overâif not totally obscured from the publicâby the unverified claims that Mr. Snowden was spoon feeding to handpicked journalists.
In his narrative, Mr. Snowden always claims that he was a conscientious âwhistleblowerâ who turned over all the stolen NSA material to journalists in Hong Kong. He has insisted he had no intention of defecting to Russia but was on his way to Latin America when he was trapped in Russia by the U.S. government in an attempt to demonize him.
For example, in October 2014, he told the editor of the Nation, âIâm in exile. My government revoked my passport intentionally to leave me exiledâ and âchose to keep me in Russia.â According to Mr. Snowden, the U.S. government accomplished this entrapment by suspending his passport while he was in midair after he departed Hong Kong on June 23, thus forcing him into the hands of President Vladimir Putinâs regime.
None of this is true. The State Department invalidated Mr. Snowdenâs passport while he was still in Hong Kong, not after he left for Moscow on June 23. The âConsul General-Hong Kong confirmed that Hong Kong authorities were notified that Mr. Snowdenâs passport was revoked June 22,â according to the State Departmentâs senior watch officer, as reported by ABC news on June 23, 2013.
Mr. Snowden could not have been unaware of the governmentâs pursuit of him, since the criminal complaint against him, which was filed June 14, had been headline news in Hong Kong. That the U.S. acted against him while he was still in Hong Kong is of great importance to the timeline because it points to the direct involvement of Aeroflot, an airline which the Russian government effectively controls. Aeroflot bypassed its normal procedures to allow Mr. Snowden to board the Moscow flightâeven though he had neither a valid passport nor a Russian visa, as his newly assigned lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, said at a press conference in Russia on July 12, 2013.
By falsely claiming his passport was invalidated after the plane departed Hong Kongâinstead of before he leftâMr. Snowden hoped to conceal this extraordinary waiver. The Russian government further revealed its helping hand, judging by a report in Russiaâs Izvestia newspaper when, on arrival, Mr. Snowden was taken off the plane by a security team in a âspecial operation.â
Nor was it any kind of accident. Vladimir Putin personally authorized this assistance after Mr. Snowden met with Russian officials in Hong Kong, as Mr. Putin admitted in a televised press conference on Sept. 2, 2013.
To provide a smokescreen for Mr. Snowdenâs escape from Hong Kong, WikiLeaks (an organization that the Obama administration asserted to be a tool of Russian intelligence after the hacking of Democratic Party leadersâ email in 2016) booked a dozen or more diversionary flight reservations to other destinations for Mr. Snowden.
WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange also dispatched Sarah Harrison, his deputy at WikiLeaks, to fly to Hong Kong to pay Mr. Snowdenâs expenses and escort him to Moscow. In short, Mr. Snowdenâs arrival in Moscow was neither accidental nor the work of the U.S. government.
Mr. Snowdenâs own narrative asserts that he came to Russia not only empty-handed but without access to any of the stolen material. He wrote in Vanity Fair in 2014 that he had destroyed all of it before arriving in Moscowâthe very data that he went to such lengths to steal a few weeks earlier in Hawaii.
As it turns out, this claim is also untrue. It is belied by two Kremlin insiders who were in a position to know what Mr. Snowden actually brought with him to Moscow. One of them, Frants Klintsevich, was the first deputy chairman of the defense and security committee of the Duma (Russiaâs parliament) at the time of Mr. Snowdenâs defection. âLetâs be frank,â Mr. Klintsevich said in a taped interview with NPR in June 2016, âMr. Snowden did share intelligence. This is what security services do.â
The other insider was Anatoly Kucherena, a well-connected Moscow lawyer and Mr. Putinâs friend. Mr. Kucherena served as the intermediary between Mr. Snowden and Russian authorities. On Sept. 23, 2013, Mr. Kucherena gave a long interview to Sophie Shevardnadze, a journalist for Russia Today television.
When Ms. Shevardnadze directly asked him if Mr. Snowden had given all the documents he had taken from the NSA to journalists in Hong Kong, Mr. Kucherena said Mr. Snowden had only given âsomeâ of the NSAâs documents in his possession to journalists in Hong Kong. âSo he [Mr. Snowden] does have some materials that havenât been made public yet?â Ms. Shevardnadze asked. âCertainly,â Mr. Kucherena answered.
This disclosure filled in a crucial piece of the puzzle. It explained why NSA documents that Mr. Snowden had copied, but had not given to the journalists in Hong Kongâsuch as the embarrassing revelation about the NSA targeting the cellphone of German Chancellor Angela Merkelâcontinued to surface after Mr. Snowden arrived in Moscow, along with NSA documents released via WikiLeaks.
As this was a critical discrepancy in Mr. Snowdenâs narrative, I went to Moscow in October 2015 to see Mr. Kucherena. During our conversation, Mr. Kucherena confirmed that his interview with Ms. Shevardnadze was accurate, and that Mr. Snowden had brought secret material with him to Moscow.
Mr. Snowdenâs narrative also includes the assertion that he was neither debriefed by nor even met with any Russian government official after he arrived in Moscow. This part of the narrative runs counter to findings of U.S. intelligence. According to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report, Mr. Snowden, since he arrived in Moscow, âhas had, and continues to have, contact with Russian intelligence services.â This finding is consistent with Russian debriefing practices, as described by the ex-KGB officers with whom I spoke in Moscow
Mr. Snowden also publicly claimed in Moscow in December 2013 to have secrets in his head, including âaccess to every target, every active operation. Full lists of them.â Could Mr. Snowdenâs Russian hosts ignore such an opportunity after Mr. Putin had authorized his exfiltration to Moscow? Mr. Snowden, with no exit options, was in the palm of their hands. Under such circumstances, as Mr. Klintsevich pointed out in his June NPR interview: âIf thereâs a possibility to get information, they [the Russian intelligence services] will get it.â
The transfer of state secrets from Mr. Snowden to Russia did not occur in a vacuum. The intelligence war did not end with the termination of the Cold War; it shifted to cyberspace. Even if Russia could not match the NSAâs state-of-the-art sensors, computers and productive partnerships with the cipher services of Britain, Israel, Germany and other allies, it could nullify the U.S. agencyâs edge by obtaining its sources and methods from even a single contractor with access to Level 3 documents.
Russian intelligence uses a single umbrella term to cover anyone who delivers it secret intelligence. Whether a person acted out of idealistic motives, sold information for money or remained clueless of the role he or she played in the transfer of secretsâthe provider of secret data is considered an âespionage source.â By any measure, it is a job description that fits Mr. Snowden.
Mr. Epsteinâs book, âHow America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft,â will be published by Knopf in January.
@88m3 @Leasy @ADevilYouKhow @GzUp @wire28 @Atlrocafella @@ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @dtownreppin214
These #Trumpset "negroes" (if they are even black) are in for a rude awakening.
@88m3 @Leasy @ADevilYouKhow @GzUp @wire28 @Atlrocafella @@ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @Jello Biafra @Chicken Pot Pie @humble forever @Darth Nubian @General Mills @88m3 @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @JUSE_HEDD @blotter @BaggerofTea @dtownreppin214
Do we need Gladio again?
@88m3 @Leasy @ADevilYouKhow @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Blessed Is the Man @88m3 @dtownreppin214 @BaggerofTea